Dr. John Vervaeke

What happens when the founder of Internal Family Systems and a cognitive scientist of meaning sit down to compare notes on parts, Self, and the guides that show up when the inner world quiets?

In this Lectern dialogue, psychotherapist Seth Allison takes the host chair so John Vervaeke can talk peer to peer with Dick Schwartz, the creator of Internal Family Systems (IFS). Dick tells the origin story: a 1980s outcome study with bulimic clients who kept talking in the language of parts, a cutting part that changed everything when he stopped trying to beat it, and the discovery of a Self with calm, confidence and compassion beneath the parts. John traces his own path from a punitive fundamentalist upbringing through Socrates, Pierre Hadot and 4E cognitive science to IFS, and describes the day a presence announcing itself as Hermes interrupted his practice.

From there, Seth proposes that every part is doing its own relevance realization, and the three explore salience landscapes, parasitic processing, reciprocal narrowing and reciprocal opening, and what happens when the Self brings Socratic dialogue to the inner system. Dick speaks publicly about the guides he has kept quiet about for 30 years and the new book he is writing on the spirituality of IFS. John asks whether parts need education as well as healing, argues that some cognitive distortion is built into being a finite mind, proposes an experiment to test it, and makes the case that IFS is a sophisticated form of ritual. They close on psychedelics, integration, and IFS as one way back to the spiritual wisdom modernity cut us off from.

Seth Allison is a psychotherapist, coach and teacher whose work is about creating containers where transformation and growth can happen.

Dick Schwartz is the developer of Internal Family Systems.

John Vervaeke is a cognitive scientist and philosopher whose work explores cognition, meaning, wisdom, and the meaning crisis.

Seth Allison - LinkedIn Awakening from the Meaning Crisis - John Vervaeke Daemons Are Forever

00:00 Cold open: guides and Hermes-like experiences 01:10 Welcome: Seth Allison takes the host chair 02:50 Check-ins 03:50 The origin of IFS: a bulimia study and the language of parts 07:40 The cutting part and "I give up" 10:10 "We can safely say that there are no bad parts." (Dick Schwartz) 11:05 Discovering the Self and its C-word qualities 14:40 John's two streams: science and spirit 17:50 Hadot, spiritual exercises and 4E cognitive science 20:50 COVID, attachment theory and finding IFS 22:15 Hermes shows up during IFS practice 24:00 Predictive processing and the three meta problems 29:40 Precision weighting and relevance realization 32:10 Agency, autopoiesis and transjective meaning 34:45 Seth's proposal: every part does relevance realization 38:00 Salience landscapes and reciprocal opening 42:05 Parasitic processing and reciprocal narrowing 44:45 Socratic dialogue with parts 47:10 Why Hermes showed up: John's hypothesis 49:00 The Self as a Socratic third party 50:15 The spirituality of IFS and guides 52:30 Making change last: protectors and unburdening 53:40 Beyond therapy: the existential project and the divine double 56:50 IFS as attachment theory taken inside 58:25 Spiritual bypassing and the "pesky ego" 01:01:20 Do parts need education, not just healing? 01:05:55 Education vs. unburdening 01:09:40 Cognitive distortion beyond trauma 01:13:45 An experiment John proposes 01:15:45 Legacy burdens 01:16:35 Is Self optimal relevance realization? 01:19:40 Dick's new book and lost spiritual wisdom 01:21:50 IFS as ritual 01:25:35 Psychedelics, integration and IFS 01:28:05 Last words

The Vervaeke Foundation is committed to advancing the scientific pursuit of wisdom and creating a significant impact on the world. Become a part of our mission.

Join Awaken to Meaning to explore practices that enhance your virtues and foster deeper connections with reality and relationships.

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

What if becoming wiser requires a relationship with a "divine double" within you?

In episode three of the series, John and Harvard's Charles Stang move on from Plato, Xenophon, and Aristophanes to Apuleius' 2nd-century text On the God of Socrates, which imagines philosophy as a kind of daimonology that begins and ends with two daimons: the daimon that is your soul and the daimon that is your double. Apuleius presents daimons as intermediaries between dispassionate gods and passionate humans, translating the gods' care into the language of emotion, and then complicates his own taxonomy: human souls are themselves daimons, the air is populated by the formerly embodied dead, and some daimons were never embodied at all and attach themselves to our souls as guides.

Along the way, John and Charles compare daimons with biblical angels and connect the daimonic to internal family systems, grief-time encounters with the dead, dialogical rationality, the future self, and intuition as non-conscious pattern detection that needs dialectic as a check. John speaks openly about a waking vision and a dream of Hermes, before Charles previews Porphyry's story of an Egyptian priest summoning Plotinus' daimon at the temple of Isis in Rome.

Charles Stang is Professor of Early Christian Thought at Harvard Divinity School, Director of the Center for the Study of World Religions at Harvard, and the author of Our Divine Double. In this episode, he guides John through Apuleius' On the God of Socrates and its vision of philosophy as knowing your own daimonic soul and cultivating a relationship with its divine double.

John Vervaeke is a cognitive scientist and philosopher whose work explores cognition, meaning, wisdom, and the meaning crisis. In this conversation, he brings 4E cognitive science, the dialogical self, and research on intuition to bear on Apuleius' account, and shares his own encounters with Hermes.

Study the daimon with Charles: Daemons in Divinity on The Lectern

Charles Stang's Web On the God of Socrates - Apuleius Our Divine Double - Charles M. Stang Symposium - Plato Divination and Human Nature - Peter T. Struck Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism - Crystal Addey On the Life of Plotinus - Porphyry

The Vervaeke Foundation is committed to advancing the scientific pursuit of wisdom and creating a significant impact on the world. Become a part of our mission.

Join Awaken to Meaning to explore practices that enhance your virtues and foster deeper connections with reality and relationships.

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

What was Socrates actually hearing when his daimon spoke, and why might the space in-between, neither purely inside us nor fully outside us, be the key to discerning spirits today?

In part two of the Lectern series on the daimon, Charles Stang and John Vervaeke move from Plato to Socrates' other witnesses, Xenophon and Aristophanes. Charles shows that the indictment against Socrates charged him with not worshipping the gods of the state (theoi) and with bringing in novel divinities (daimonia), and that Xenophon defends him by presenting his daimonion as ordinary divination. John responds from cognitive science, describing a continuum of felt presence experiences, and warns against two opposite biases: treating every such entity as demonic, or trusting every one as a benevolent guide. Drawing on his own ongoing dialogues with Hermes, he argues that discernment of spirits is a learnable skill, more like a martial art than a set of propositions.

The discussion then turns to Aristophanes' The Clouds, where Socrates is satirised hanging in a basket among divinities of the air, and on to breath, Tai Chi, and enacted metaphor. From suspension they arrive at betweenness: Diotima's description of Eros as a daimon, the philosopher as metaxu, and finite transcendence, before closing on how the meaning crisis has left us without ways to discern spirits, setting up the next conversation on Apuleius.

Charles Stang is Professor of Early Christian Thought at Harvard Divinity School and Director of the Center for the Study of World Religions at Harvard. In this episode, he examines Socrates' daimon through the witness of Xenophon and Aristophanes, and the ancient association of daimons with air and with the space between humans and gods.

John Vervaeke is a cognitive scientist and philosopher whose work explores cognition, meaning, wisdom, and the meaning crisis. In this conversation, he brings cognitive science, embodied practice, and his ongoing dialogues with Hermes to bear on the daimon, felt presence, and the discernment of spirits.

Study the daimon with Charles: Daemons in Divinity on The Lectern

Charles Stang's Web

Memorabilia - Xenophon The Clouds - Aristophanes Symposium - Plato Apology - Plato Presence - Ben Alderson-Day Being and the Between - William Desmond

00:00 Cold open: entity encounters 01:50 Welcome back, Charles Stang 03:00 Recap: Plato's Socrates daimon 04:30 Xenophon's Memorabilia 05:20 The indictment: theoi vs. daimonia 08:10 Divination and divine signs 09:40 Xenophon's two novelties 11:20 Psychology of felt presence 16:40 Beyond binary ontology 19:50 Impiety and corrupting youth 21:20 Hermes and bipolar bias 28:50 Psychedelic entity encounters 31:00 Discernment as martial art 35:00 Pivot to The Clouds 38:50 Socrates in a basket 42:00 Spiritual alchemy and elements 44:00 Cerebellum and enacted metaphor 48:00 Why air? Breath as bridge 53:20 Suspending judgment and Tai Chi 55:40 Betweenness and Diotima's Eros 57:30 Metaxu and finite transcendence 59:02 "We are not transcendent purely. That is to be a god. We are not merely finite. That is to be an animal." 01:00:50 Meaning crisis, lost discernment 01:03:50 William Desmond and the metaxu 01:06:50 Closing thanks

The Vervaeke Foundation is committed to advancing the scientific pursuit of wisdom and creating a significant impact on the world. Become a part of our mission.

Join Awaken to Meaning to explore practices that enhance your virtues and foster deeper connections with reality and relationships.

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

How do you make deep philosophical and transformative work accessible to more people without sacrificing the precision, rigor, and depth that make it meaningful in the first place?

John Vervaeke, with Ethan Hsieh and Taylor Barratt, discusses recurring feedback that his work is meaningful but hard to share, and the ethical tension between precision and epistemic responsibility on one side and making ideas broadly shareable on the other. They describe practical steps already taken or planned: clearer scaffolding in Lectern courses, additional instructors, a teaching-assistance program, adapting content into books, new pathways through the large YouTube catalog, and shorter thematic overview videos.

They also introduce a 12-module Studio app built around a 5–15 minute daily practice habit, with an AI "coach" designed with ethical constraints, to translate key ideas (the four Ps, relevance realization, DIME) into accessible practice. Finally, they outline a tiered practice ecosystem of intensives, retreats, and the Reframe Festival (June 3–6, 2027, Colorado), plus a six-week Awaken to Meaning practice course, and invite good-faith audience feedback.

Together, they explore:

• the challenge of making John Vervaeke's philosophical and scientific work more accessible without sacrificing rigor
• why accessibility involves more than simply making information easier to understand
• the tension between precision, epistemic responsibility, and reaching a broader audience
• why accessibility also includes financial, educational, relational, and structural dimensions
• how The Lectern can create different entry points for people with different levels of experience
• the role of the Studio app in helping people build a habit of practice
• how group practice, watch parties, and supportive relationships make philosophical practice more sustainable
• how the Four Ps of Knowing, relevance realization, and the DIME framework are introduced through a more accessible structure
• why a structured approach can help people who struggle with executive functioning
• the different levels of engagement offered through courses, practice groups, retreats, intensives, and festivals
• how practice communities can function like a dojo for developing skills

00:00 Why Accessibility Matters 00:30 Welcome and Video Purpose 02:00 Accuracy vs Accessibility Tension 07:00 Taylor on Vulnerability and Reach 10:00 Practice and Relationship Impacts 13:26 "How do we make it accessible such that people who don't have to work an extra job just to be able to pay for a course?" 14:30 Progressive Teaching and Prereqs 20:00 Multiple Mediums and Channel Overload 24:00 New Access Pathways and Shorter Videos 26:00 Introducing the Practice App 28:30 App Modules and Daily Habit Design 32:00 AI Coach Feature and Ethics 34:30 Ethan on Pedagogy and Core Ideas 36:30 Habit Gap After Insight 38:00 App as Training Wheels 39:30 ADHD Friendly Structure 42:00 Tiered Practice Pathways 44:30 Reframe Festival Details 47:00 Retreats Between Intensives 49:30 Hardcore Training Track 54:00 Ecosystem Not Closed 56:30 Feedback and Next Steps 58:00 Six Week Practice Gateway 01:01:30 Final Encouragement and Thanks

Resources Find Clarity and Connection in a Noisy World App Teaching Assistance Program (TAP) Reframe Festival from Awaken to Meaning Relational Ecology Program (REP) on Awaken to Meaning

Explore courses and teachings from The Lectern

Support the Lectern and join a growing community of wisdom seekers on Patreon

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

What if the problem isn't that religions disagree, but that we invented the idea that you can only belong to one?

In this Silk Road Seminar, John Vervaeke sits down with theologian John J. Thatamanil, author of Circling the Elephant: A Comparative Theology of Religious Diversity. Thatamanil traces his path from the ancient Mar Thoma Christian tradition of South India to comparative theology, and makes the case that our modern idea of "religion" is a recent invention, born alongside the secular, entangled with colonialism and racialization, and built to sort people into single, sealed boxes. Together, they explore:

• Why religion is not a natural kind, and why the village atheist and the fundamentalist mirror each other
• Tillich, participation, and God as the ground of being rather than a being
• Religion as comprehensive qualitative orientation: interpretive schemes and therapeutic regimes that "true" our desires
• Semiotic symbiosis, process perennialism, and horizontal vs. vertical non-dualism
• Pilgrims, not tourists: how deep practice across traditions renews faith
• Why capitalism functions as a religion, and where hope lives now

John J. Thatamanil is Professor of Theology and World Religions at Union Theological Seminary in New York. His work in comparative theology focuses on Hindu and Buddhist non-dualism and the possibility of a Christian non-dualism. He is the author of Circling the Elephant and The Immanent Divine.

Books mentioned: Circling the Elephant (John J. Thatamanil), In Praise of Mixed Religion (Victoria S. Harrison), Without Buddha I Could Not Be a Christian (Paul Knitter), The Invention of Religion in Japan (Jason Ānanda Josephson).

00:00 Welcome to the Silk Road Seminar 01:41 From Mar Thoma Christianity to comparative theology 07:37 Religion and its "Siamese twin," the secular 12:36 Why religion isn't a natural kind 22:24 The village atheist and facile theism 29:07 Tillich, participation, and the ground of being 36:11 Religion as comprehensive qualitative orientation 43:08 Interpretive schemes and therapeutic regimes 47:09 Jesus, the Buddha, and truth as a person 48:37 Dialogos and semiotic symbiosis 56:55 "Multiplicity is life, and singularity is almost always death." 01:00:51 Perennialism vs. process perennialism 01:08:32 Love, knowledge, and the post-truth condition 01:12:40 Q&A: Traditionalism, perennialism, and Eliade 01:19:27 Horizontal and vertical non-dualism 01:25:13 Narrative archetypes and "Protestant Buddhism" 01:32:19 Is capitalism a religion? 01:38:01 What gives you hope?

The Vervaeke Foundation is committed to advancing the scientific pursuit of wisdom and creating a significant impact on the world. Become a part of our mission.

Join Awaken to Meaning to explore practices that enhance your virtues and foster deeper connections with reality and relationships.

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

Could the "divine double" be a hidden guide within us, and what happens when we begin to recognize it?

Harvard Divinity School professor Charles Stang, author of Our Divine Double, joins Ethan to introduce his Lectern course Daemons in Divinity and the ancient Greek idea of the daimon. Stang traces Socrates' daimonion, the guiding sign that shaped his life, through Plato and later thinkers who saw daimons as intermediaries or as a person's highest faculty, which makes us "gods in waiting." He contrasts loose "higher self" talk with disciplined discernment, and shares uncanny reading experiences as encounters with a divine double.

Enroll in Daemons in Divinity: https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/courses/daemons-in-divinity

Together, they explore:

• the daimon and Socrates' inner sign

• the divine double as counterpart, alter ego or twin

• discernment and the risk of self-deception

• daimons as bodies of air

• partnership, not possession

• the modern loss of the daimonic

• reading as a transformative encounter across time

• from "Flatland" to a vertical, multidimensional reality

Timestamps

00:00 Reading as Transformation

01:30 Welcome and Guest Intro

04:00 Socrates and the Daimonion

06:00 Divine Double Framework

09:00 Course Purpose and Modern Relevance

11:00 Roleplay Skeptic Questions

17:00 Discernment and Self Deception

27:30 Extraordinary Encounters Explained

31:00 What Is a Daimon

35:00 Ambiguity and Axis Shift

37:30 Wisdom Beyond Outcomes

39:00 Socrates and the Inner Sign

42:00 Daimons as Bodies of Air

43:00 Seeing Air Through Apuleius

45:30 Theater as Spirit Vessel

50:00 Partnership Not Possession

52:00 Modern Loss of the Daimonic

56:00 Higher Self vs Deep Practice

59:00 Vertical Self and Jung

01:03:00 Puppy Crisis and Jesus

01:06:30 Uncanny Reading and Flatland to Spaceland

01:10:30 Daimon and God

01:13:00 Course Takeaways and Farewell

Explore courses from The Lectern: https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/

Support the Lectern on Patreon: patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | X | YouTube

Thank you for listening!

What if religion was never really about belief, but about how we make meaning?

Trust in institutions like religion, law, science, and journalism is collapsing, yet some of the most demanding traditions, like Eastern Orthodoxy and the traditional Latin Mass, are growing as people seek ritual, discipline, and transformation. In this talk, John Vervaeke argues it is increasingly difficult to study human cognition without studying religion, pointing to the co-emergence of religion and human cognition, the importance of imaginal cognition, altered states and mystical experience, and non-propositional knowing in 4E cognitive science. He critiques first-generation cognitive science of religion for treating religions as irrational, belief-based "failed science" and for ignoring religious studies. Drawing on ethnography and genealogy, he argues that religions are porous, syncretistic ecologies of practice, that the "religion" construct is historically contingent, and that a process theory should ask how people become religious, including through credibility-enhancing displays.

In this talk, John explores:

• why religion continues to matter in a modern world that often considers itself increasingly secular
• how cognitive science has shaped, and sometimes limited, our understanding of religion
• the rise of the "imaginal" and its role in human cognition and religious experience
• why religion cannot be reduced to belief or explained simply as a cognitive byproduct
• how science and religion became divided through modern dichotomies
• why cognitive science needs to engage with insights from religious studies
• how religions are porous, interconnected, and shaped through historical exchange
• how Equus illustrates the relationship between sacred meaning and human experience
• why religion is better understood as an ecology of practices rather than a system of beliefs
• how credibility-enhancing displays (CREDs) shape participation in traditions
• how institutional trust, religious revival, and the contemporary "trust apocalypse" are connected
• how fluency and participation can open pathways toward mystical experience

00:00 Welcome To The Lectern 01:00 Religious Revival Paradox 02:00 Why Cognition Needs Religion 03:30 The Rise Of The Imaginal 06:00 Spiritual Not Religious 07:15 Early CogSci Religion Assumptions 09:45 Adaptation Vs Byproduct Debate 11:30 NOMA And Modern Dichotomies 15:00 Postmodern Critique Of Binaries 18:30 Why Consult Religious Studies 20:15 Religions Are Porous Not Pure 21:45 The Origin Of God Genealogy 27:00 Equus And Sacred Meaning 28:45 Equus In The Dark 30:30 Syncretism And Capitalism 31:30 Religion As Practice Ecology 32:45 CRED And Becoming Rational 35:45 Meaning Sacred And Apprenticeship 37:30 Process Theory Of Religion 41:00 Genealogy And Imperial Construct 44:00 Q&A Rejecting The Sacred 46:30 Institutions Trust And Revival 50:00 Beauty Fluency Mysticism

—

Explore courses and teachings from The Lectern https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/

Support the Lectern and join a growing community of wisdom seekers https://www.patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

—

Thank you for listening!

What if religion was never really about belief, but about how we make meaning?

Trust in institutions like religion, law, science, and journalism is collapsing, yet some of the most demanding traditions, like Eastern Orthodoxy and the traditional Latin Mass, are growing as people seek ritual, discipline, and transformation. In this talk, John Vervaeke argues it is increasingly difficult to study human cognition without studying religion, pointing to the co-emergence of religion and human cognition, the importance of imaginal cognition, altered states and mystical experience, and non-propositional knowing in 4E cognitive science. He critiques first-generation cognitive science of religion for treating religions as irrational, belief-based "failed science" and for ignoring religious studies. Drawing on ethnography and genealogy, he argues that religions are porous, syncretistic ecologies of practice, that the "religion" construct is historically contingent, and that a process theory should ask how people become religious, including through credibility-enhancing displays.

In this talk, John explores:

• why religion continues to matter in a modern world that often considers itself increasingly secular
• how cognitive science has shaped, and sometimes limited, our understanding of religion
• the rise of the "imaginal" and its role in human cognition and religious experience
• why religion cannot be reduced to belief or explained simply as a cognitive byproduct
• how science and religion became divided through modern dichotomies
• why cognitive science needs to engage with insights from religious studies
• how religions are porous, interconnected, and shaped through historical exchange
• how Equus illustrates the relationship between sacred meaning and human experience
• why religion is better understood as an ecology of practices rather than a system of beliefs
• how credibility-enhancing displays (CREDs) shape participation in traditions
• how institutional trust, religious revival, and the contemporary "trust apocalypse" are connected
• how fluency and participation can open pathways toward mystical experience

00:00 Welcome To The Lectern 01:00 Religious Revival Paradox 02:00 Why Cognition Needs Religion 03:30 The Rise Of The Imaginal 06:00 Spiritual Not Religious 07:15 Early CogSci Religion Assumptions 09:45 Adaptation Vs Byproduct Debate 11:30 NOMA And Modern Dichotomies 15:00 Postmodern Critique Of Binaries 18:30 Why Consult Religious Studies 20:15 Religions Are Porous Not Pure 21:45 The Origin Of God Genealogy 27:00 Equus And Sacred Meaning 28:45 Equus In The Dark 30:30 Syncretism And Capitalism 31:30 Religion As Practice Ecology 32:45 CRED And Becoming Rational 35:45 Meaning Sacred And Apprenticeship 37:30 Process Theory Of Religion 41:00 Genealogy And Imperial Construct 44:00 Q&A Rejecting The Sacred 46:30 Institutions Trust And Revival 50:00 Beauty Fluency Mysticism

—

Explore courses and teachings from The Lectern https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/

Support the Lectern and join a growing community of wisdom seekers https://www.patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

—

Thank you for listening!

Can we find freedom in a world of endless choice—or is deeper liberation found in the people we refuse to leave?

In the first of a three-part Lectern Dialogues series, John Vervaeke is joined by Elizabeth Oldfield and her husband, Christopher Oldfield, for a conversation on intentional communal living as a spiritual practice within a Christian orientation.

Elizabeth and Christopher share life with their children and three other adults in a small London home shaped by a shared rule of life: collective prayer, hospitality, study, play, administration, and the daily work of formation. They distinguish committed community from casual cohabitation, exploring how proximity, conflict, repair, and shared rhythms can cultivate deeper friendship and fellowship.

The conversation connects intentional community with John's work on the philosophical Silk Road, renewing the senses, dialogical selfhood, attachment, participation, and the critique of modern individualism. It also takes seriously the risks of self-deception and toxic religion, asking what discernment and faithful communal maturation require.

Guests

Christopher Oldfield is a philosopher affiliated with the Faraday Institute for Science and Religion in Cambridge. His work explores wisdom, metaphysics, personhood, participation, and the sacred.

Elizabeth Oldfield writes and speaks on spirituality, community, and relational life, examining how shared practices can restore connection with one another and with God.

Resources

Christopher Oldfield: https://www.chrisoldfieldphilosophy.com/

Elizabeth Oldfield on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/elizabeth-oldfield-5a5b6216/

Plato, The Seventh Letter: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/seventh_letter.html

A Hidden Life: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5827916/

The Thin Red Line: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120863/

Explore courses and teachings from The Lectern: https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/

Support The Lectern on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Follow John Vervaeke: Website: https://johnvervaeke.com/ X: https://twitter.com/vervaeke_john YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@johnvervaeke Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Chapters

00:00 Welcome to The Lectern 02:00 Elizabeth on friendship 04:30 Christopher's introduction 08:00 Why intentional community 09:30 Commitment and covenant 12:30 Rhythms of a rule of life 16:30 Plato and collective spirit 21:30 Creed, "we," and "I" 27:00 Dialogical self and science 31:30 Relearning wisdom today 39:00 Intimacy and modern culture 46:30 Rethinking eros 48:3030 Hearth and fellowship 49:00 Covenant friendship 49:30 Life inside community 52:30 Religion as holy listening 54:00 Religion as care and rebinding 56:30 Empire and invented religion 59:00 Shared scripture and shared life 01:01:00 Is religion accessible? 01:03:00 Practice and participation 01:05:00 Communal maturation 01:08:30 Rupture, repair, and intimacy 01:13:00 "We too" identity in Ephesians 01:17:30 Renewing the senses 01:24:30 Attachment and attunement 01:27:30 Discernment and toxic religion 01:30:00 Friendship as the path

What if God isn't a finished substance standing outside the world, but a living process we participate in?

In this Silk Road Seminar, John Vervaeke is joined by process philosophers Andrew M. Davis and Matt Segall. John opens with the core moves of Seeing God Again for the First Time and the Philosophical Silk Road: dissolving modernity's dichotomies, renewing our sense of the sacred, and moving between traditions as a pilgrim rather than a tourist. From there, the three bring Whitehead's process thought into dialogue with Neoplatonism, Daoism, and Buddhism. Together, they explore:

• Process perennialism vs. propositional perennialism
• Primordiality, ultimacy, and the consequent nature of God
• Why God is not an individualized substance, and what that means for theism and atheism
• Hartshorne's dipolar theism and a dynamic view of perfection
• Anatheism, non-duality, and the inexhaustible sacred
• Faith as disposition rather than propositional assent, and the criteria for judging deeper framings of reality

Andrew M. Davis leads research and conference programming at the Center for Process Studies. He is the author of Mind, Value, and Cosmos: On the Relational Nature of Ultimacy and the forthcoming Whitehead's Universe: A Prismatic Introduction (Orbis Books).

Matt Segall is a professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies, where he teaches process philosophy and German idealism, approaching philosophy as a transformative practice.

Center for Process Studies | Andrew M. Davis | Matt Segall (Footnotes2Plato)

00:00 Welcome to the Silk Road Seminar 01:44 Matt Segall and Andrew Davis introduce themselves 05:00 Seeing God Again for the First Time 11:09 The Philosophical Silk Road as pilgrimage 15:50 Cobb, Whitehead, and Buddhist-Christian dialogue 17:59 Process perennialism 24:19 Primordiality, ultimacy, and Zen Neoplatonism 27:53 The consequent nature of God 39:45 God is not an individualized substance 51:16 Hartshorne and dipolar theism 01:00:44 Rethinking omniscience and omnipotence 01:08:27 Anatheism: returning to God after God 01:12:06 The sacred obligation to pilgrimage 01:18:50 Propositional vs. dispositional faith 01:25:20 "It's more important that a proposition be interesting than that it be true." 01:31:42 Q&A: Fidelity to tradition and openness to others 01:42:36 How do we judge one framing of reality as deeper? 01:49:55 Collective individuation 02:02:31 Closing words

The Vervaeke Foundation is committed to advancing the scientific pursuit of wisdom and creating a significant impact on the world. Become a part of our mission.

Join Awaken to Meaning to explore practices that enhance your virtues and foster deeper connections with reality and relationships.

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

What if the very thing we fear most—nonbeing—is also what gives life its deepest meaning?

John Vervaeke welcomes philosopher Corey Anton to discuss his book, How Nonbeing Haunts Being: On Possibilities, Morality, and Death Acceptance. They explore how absence, limitation, possibility, mortality, and death are not merely negations of life, but central to how meaning, identity, and moral responsibility emerge.

Corey situates the book as the third in a trilogy and describes a naturalist yet spiritually open orientation: one that rejects an afterlife while affirming reverence for the mystery of existence and a morality grounded in this life. John and Corey consider embodiment, perception, grief, ego death, psychedelics, dignity in dying, AI and the meaning crisis, and the challenge of evil.

Drawing on Sartre, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Nishitani, Terence Deacon, Epicurus, and Douglas Harding's Headless Way, this conversation asks how accepting mortality might deepen wisdom, enrich ordinary life, and open us to a more participatory relationship with reality.

Resources

How Nonbeing Haunts Being: On Possibilities, Morality, and Death Acceptance by Corey Anton: https://www.amazon.com/Non-being-Haunts-Being-Possibilities-Communication-ebook/dp/B08MDL3LX7/

Explore courses and teachings from The Lectern: https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/

Support The Lectern on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Follow John Vervaeke: Website: https://johnvervaeke.com/ X: https://x.com/DrJohnVervaeke YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@johnvervaeke Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/johnvervaeke

Chapters

00:00 Welcome and book praise 00:41 Nonbeing East and West 04:54 Spirituality without an afterlife 06:58 Thirst and everyday absence 09:15 Recovering Catholic roots 12:20 Reverence versus fire insurance 15:12 The Headless Way and openness 22:10 Embodiment makes relations real 24:14 No view from nowhere 27:24 Grief and mortality acceptance 31:54 Sartre meets Harding 34:45 Merleau-Ponty and psychedelics 37:55 A community of the dying 38:35 Epicurus on the fear of death 40:56 Dignity and dying 42:47 The right to die 46:02 Pain and despair 53:23 The sacred as inexhaustible 55:36 AI and the meaning crisis 59:43 How meaning works 01:01:16 Resonance over happiness 01:09:59 Mystery, love, and evil 01:14:52 The bodhisattva response 01:17:02 Closing reflections