
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


For the June 2025 bonus episode of the Reading Teachers Lounge podcast, Shannon and Mary discuss the article "Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice" by Seidenberg, Borkenhagen, and Kearns.
The article explores why the science of reading often fails to transform into successful instruction. The most significant gap is what the authors refer to as "translational research," which explicitly connects laboratory findings to practical classroom applications. Looking toward solutions, we discuss the authors' recommendations for cross-disciplinary collaborations, developing a true science of teaching, avoiding a narrow focus on phonics, investing in early learning, ensuring research applies to diverse populations, and examining existing instructional systems.
Join us in understanding why teachers have struggled with conflicting directives and why it's not their fault they've had to piece together approaches without clear, research-based guidance. The goal isn't "balanced literacy" but "balanced learning"—providing each student exactly what they need, when they need it.
Seidenberg, M. S., Borkenhagen, M. C., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S119–S130.
LINK TO OPEN-SOURCE RESEARCH ARTICLE:
Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice by Mark Seidenberg, Matt Cooper Borkenhagen, and Devin Kearns (2020 ILA Reading Research Quarterly)
By Shannon Betts and Mary Saghafi4.8
122122 ratings
For the June 2025 bonus episode of the Reading Teachers Lounge podcast, Shannon and Mary discuss the article "Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice" by Seidenberg, Borkenhagen, and Kearns.
The article explores why the science of reading often fails to transform into successful instruction. The most significant gap is what the authors refer to as "translational research," which explicitly connects laboratory findings to practical classroom applications. Looking toward solutions, we discuss the authors' recommendations for cross-disciplinary collaborations, developing a true science of teaching, avoiding a narrow focus on phonics, investing in early learning, ensuring research applies to diverse populations, and examining existing instructional systems.
Join us in understanding why teachers have struggled with conflicting directives and why it's not their fault they've had to piece together approaches without clear, research-based guidance. The goal isn't "balanced literacy" but "balanced learning"—providing each student exactly what they need, when they need it.
Seidenberg, M. S., Borkenhagen, M. C., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S119–S130.
LINK TO OPEN-SOURCE RESEARCH ARTICLE:
Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice by Mark Seidenberg, Matt Cooper Borkenhagen, and Devin Kearns (2020 ILA Reading Research Quarterly)

2,413 Listeners

1,250 Listeners

272 Listeners

634 Listeners

434 Listeners

646 Listeners

211 Listeners

205 Listeners

62 Listeners

10,660 Listeners

7,674 Listeners

83 Listeners

174 Listeners

80 Listeners

44 Listeners