The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger

By True Crime TodayNews True Crime News Commentary

Favorites
353
Followers
Typical duration
15 min
per episode
If it hooks
50%
finish an episode

Based on Podcast App listening data

The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger episodes

July 31, 2023 The Crazy Claims In The Case Of Kohberger
In a dramatic turn of events, an Idaho district court initiated a motion, ordering the defense team of the alleged Idaho quadruple murder suspect, Bryan Kohberger, to produce an alibi. This unprecedented move followed the defense's effort to dismiss the case, citing allegations of the state's manipulation of the Grand Jury.

Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old accused of the fatal stabbing of four university students in their Moscow, Idaho, home, faces mounting pressure to unveil his alibi. The heinous crime occurred in the early hours of November 13, claiming the lives of Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Madison Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20. The trial is scheduled for October, with the prosecution indicating their pursuit of the death penalty as early as June.

In light of the defense team's failure to submit an alibi before Monday's deadline, the state motioned the court to coerce Kohberger into providing a valid excuse for his absence from Moscow on the day of the murders. Prosecutors expect full details of Kohberger's whereabouts, including locations, times, and corroborating witnesses with their respective contact information.

The defense's countermove was to file a motion to dismiss, demanding either the case dismissal or remanding for a preliminary hearing. They argued that the Grand Jury was misled about the standard of proof required for an indictment. Furthermore, Kohberger's lawyers requested a halt in proceedings to contest the jury selection process without infringing on his right to a speedy trial. Both parties have filed motions to seal exhibits, restricting their public disclosure during the trial.

Idaho law specifies that a defendant's alibi defense must be submitted within ten days of a written demand from the prosecuting attorney. The Latah County prosecutor, in this case, made that demand in May, and Kohberger's defense requested an extension, asserting they hadn't been given ample time to review the prosecution's evidence. An extended deadline was set for July 24.

Despite the granted extension, Anne Taylor, Kohberger's attorney, announced on Monday evening that her client would exercise his constitutional right to silence, abstaining from submitting an alibi defense. Taylor affirmed the defense team's ongoing case investigation and preparation. She hinted at evidence corroborating Kohberger's presence elsewhere during the crime, which she promised would be revealed under statutory requirements and according to discovery and evidentiary rules.

Kohberger's defense proposed another layer to their strategy last week by suggesting that the DNA linking him to the knife sheath might have been planted. They requested additional information on how the FBI used DNA to construct family trees, leading to Kohberger. If DNA found at a crime scene doesn't belong to victims, it is customary to run it through a police database to match it with previous offenders' DNA. This technique, called a short tandem repeat (STR) comparison, tests the sample against 20 DNA markers, sufficient for identification if the person or an immediate relative's DNA is already in the system.

A criminal affidavit filed in January reported DNA matching Kohberger's was discovered on a knife sheath near the crime scene, close to Mogen and Goncalves's bodies. Further investigation matched the sheath's DNA to DNA found in trash from Kohberger's parent's home in Pennsylvania, where he was arrested in December. An STR DNA comparison confirmed a statistical match. The knife manufacturer, Ka-Bar, has no record of Kohberger purchasing the utility knife traditionally used as a hunting tool. The actual murder weapon remains undiscovered.

With the trial set for October 2, all eyes are on the proceedings in the Bryan Kohberger case, a situation escalating with each passing day.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
10 min
July 30, 2023 WEEK IN REVIEW-Is Kohberger's Defense Muddying The Waters Of Reality For Potential Jurors
Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

8 min
July 29, 2023 WEEK IN REVIEW -Will Additional DNA Evidence Help Or Hurt Bryan Kohberger's Case
Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

13 min
July 27, 2023 Is Law Enforcement Afraid Of 'Muddying The Waters' Of the Kohberger Case?
Professor and forensic scientist Dan Krane recently returned to the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, to delve deeper into the complexities of the Brian Kohberger case. The conversation centered on the recent development that the DNA of three other men was found at the crime scene. This revelation ignited a spirited discussion on the significance of DNA evidence and its impact on the trial.

Brueski pointed out the importance of conducting thorough investigations before a trial. Even when scrutinizing small details, he said, "It's always healthy to go through these sort of things… and make sure that we are dealing in facts."

Krane concurred but also drew attention to an aspect of the case he deemed problematic – how Kohberger was identified as a suspect. He explained, "We aren't sure how impressed we should be that he matches, given how he was identified."

The forensic scientist underlined that even though the DNA on a knife sheath found at the murder scene matched Kohberger's, this evidence's impressiveness could be downgraded due to "ascertainment bias" – the way Kohberger was first identified as a suspect.

Krane used a lottery ticket analogy to explain the concept of ascertainment bias. He said, "If you tell me that you've got a winning lottery ticket after having purchased 10,000 tickets, I would be 10,000 fold less impressed that you got the winning lottery ticket than if you'd gotten the ticket from having purchased just one."

While Krane acknowledged the DNA from Kohberger matched the sheath, the real issue, he asserted, was how Koberger was first identified as a suspect. The forensic scientist argued that the impressiveness of the DNA match was tainted by the process used to identify Kohberger.

The discussion also discussed why the investigators did not run all the DNA they found at the crime scene. Krane gave two reasons: the public one being that any match found in the FBI's convicted offender database must be investigated by law, which can be resource-intensive. The cynical reason, he believes, is that investigators may not want to "muddy the waters" by identifying additional persons of interest, thereby complicating their case.

Krane ended the discussion by noting that the defense's two-fold strategy aims to make the case so complex and costly that it deters the prosecution from seeking the death penalty. Simultaneously, they will strive to introduce reasonable doubt that could sway a jury towards life imprisonment.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

10 min
July 26, 2023 Forensic Scientist Dan Krane On Value Of DNA In Kohberger Case
Renowned forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane recently joined host Tony Brueski on the popular podcast "Hidden Killers" to discuss the curious DNA evidence entwined in the case of Brian Koberger, the suspect of the Idaho Four murders. Krane, an expert in his field, provided a captivating analysis of the defense's arguments, particularly focusing on the concept of 'ascertainment bias.'

Reports indicate that DNA from three men was discovered at the murder scene. Still, none matched Koberger, prompting defense attorney Jay Weston Logsden to express the need for detailed information on how genetic genealogy was used to identify Koberger as a person of interest. Krane acknowledged the legitimacy of Logsden's critique, pointing out that the CODIS database - a tool regularly used by prosecutors to generate investigative leads - was not used to identify the other two males.

Krane explained that the defense's desire for alternative suspects is understandable, given that they cannot directly access the CODIS database. They would require a court order for the prosecution and law enforcement to search on their behalf.

Furthermore, Krane argued with the state's argument that Koberger's direct DNA match from a buccal swab somehow negates the necessity for genetic genealogy. He labeled this as 'disingenuous,' invoking the concept of 'ascertainment bias.'

Krane clarified this complex term by analogy: "Let's say that there's a one in a million chance that you would have a winning lottery ticket. Ascertainment bias comes into play if you tell me that you've got a winning lottery ticket after having purchased 10,000 tickets. I would be 10,000 fold less impressed that you got the winning lottery ticket than if you'd gotten the ticket from having purchased just one."

In Koberger's case, the defense argues that the police did not randomly select him, but narrowed down potential suspects through a sizable DNA database before focusing on him. Thus, we should be less impressed by the DNA match because of how Koberger was identified. This methodology created the 'ascertainment bias' in this case.

"The key here was how they first identified him. We need to know how big of a net was cast, how many people could have been included as a possible source of the DNA because that's how much we need to downgrade or adjust how impressed we are with the match," explained Krane.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

9 min
July 25, 2023 Is Kohberger's Defense Muddying the Waters Of Reality For Potential Jurors?
As Bryan Kohberger's trial continues to unravel, the former FBI special agent and "Hidden Killers" contributor, Jennifer Coffindaffer, shared her unique insights on the latest developments in the case during a recent podcast discussion with Tony Brueski. Coffindaffer’s professional perspective helps shed light on DNA evidence's complexities, particularly in a high-profile case like Kohberger.

The defense recently drew attention to a surprising detail - the DNA evidence from three men discovered at the crime scene. While such information might raise questions at first glance, Brueski pointed out the necessity of context: “Where was the DNA found? I would guess there's maybe DNA if you look at everything in that house, from probably 50 to 100 different men.” Understanding where this DNA was located is crucial in interpreting its relevance to the case.

Coffindaffer echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the DNA findings must be analyzed in light of the circumstances. "There's only two samples that are inside the house," she clarified, expressing surprise at the small number considering the property was a college party house frequented by many individuals.

She highlighted the meticulous process investigators undertook to exclude DNA from individuals with legitimate reasons for being on the property, including fraternity members, emergency workers, and law enforcement officers. This monumental task was crucial to ensuring the integrity of the investigation and the reliability of the DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene.

However, Coffindaffer expressed concern over the defense's approach to the DNA evidence. Their objection included words such as 'placed,' potentially insinuating that evidence could have been 'planted,' which she found offensive. "That's really, I think, an unfair assessment to even use the word placed," she said.

The third DNA sample referred to by the defense was found on a glove, recovered a week after the crime. The glove, significantly different from the type Kohberger was known to have possessed, was discovered at the edge of the property. Given the wintry conditions and the location where it was found, Coffindaffer and Brueski agreed that the glove's presence was not necessarily connected to the crime. "I think it is a nothing," Coffindaffer commented, emphasizing that the prosecution was working diligently to identify the DNA on the glove.

Coffindaffer suggested that the defense's current strategy is akin to a political campaign, attempting to pepper some reasonable doubt into the narrative and the minds of potential jurors. This strategy seems to counterbalance the damning affidavit released by the prosecution.

However, Coffindaffer remains doubtful about the defense's efforts to shake the case, stating, "I don't think it's going to amount to much, Tony. I really don't."

As the Bryan Kohberger trial progresses, it's evident that the interpretation of DNA evidence and its role in the case will remain a critical focus.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

7 min
July 25, 2023 Kohberger's Empty Alibi Filed, Claiming: 'I Wasn't There'... Maybe...
Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, has offered an in-depth exploration of the recent developments in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of the shocking murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. As the deadline for providing an alibi passed, Brueski unpicked the complex threads of Kohberger's defense strategy, from vague hints about a potential alibi to insinuations of evidence tampering.

"Do we have an alibi in the case of Brian Kohberger?" Brueski asks in the podcast, “Well, that all depends on how you want to read the tea leaves. Because that's very much open for debate.” The host indicates the current ambiguity surrounding Kohberger’s alibi. Despite Kohberger's repeated assurances of his innocence and his promise of eventual exoneration, the defense team chose to submit a generic statement, falling short of a proper alibi, as the alibi submission deadline approached.

The host calls this development into question, stating, "If you have hard factual evidence showing that you were indeed somewhere else being corroborated by other people, you bring that to light before trial because a judge can take a look at that and go, okay, this can be verified, we can drop these charges." Brueski notes that the decision to withhold such crucial information could stem from either a calculated move by a defense attorney in their effort to vigorously defend their client or be a showcase of Kohberger's alleged narcissistic tendencies.

Brueski emphasizes his suspicions regarding Kohberger's refusal to disclose details of his alibi, remarking, “I'm guessing he's remaining silent because he sounds like an incompetent fool when talking about what exactly went on that day.” The host opines that Kohberger’s silence is a strategy to prevent himself from sounding foolish if he tries to explain his movements on the day of the crime.

The case takes another bewildering twist as the defense team suggested the possibility of evidence tampering, specifically that Kohberger's DNA could have been deliberately planted at the crime scene by law enforcement. Brueski delivers a dose of sarcasm in response, "Yes, they're going the OJ route with all else. Let's get a glove involved, too, shall we?"

The podcast host further scrutinizes this claim, arguing, “The court filing suggesting the potential evidence that shows the presence of Kohberger at a different location during the murders and the questioning of the validity of the DNA evidence both occurred ahead of the alibi submission deadline. Developments suggest the Kohberger 's defense team may be employing a strategy of simply sowing seeds of doubts.”

Brueski closes the podcast with a striking prediction: “But the belief of this podcaster right here is that man is going to soak in and enjoy every moment of the ride until he meets the bullets.” He suggests that Kohberger may be taking pleasure in the unfolding drama, oblivious to the inevitable consequences he is facing.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
10 min
July 25, 2023 DNA Of 3 Different Men Found At Idaho College Murder House
As the legal proceedings continue for Bryan Kohberger, a suspect in a chilling murder case at the University of Idaho, the discussion around DNA evidence and its implications becomes a centerpiece of the trial. Former felony prosecutor and current civil and criminal litigator, Eric Faddis, joined podcast host Tony Brueski on his show, "Hidden Killers," to analyze the role of DNA evidence in the case.

The defense team for Kohberger is zeroing in on an intriguing detail - the presence of DNA from three men at the crime scene. Amid the torrent of information streaming from this high-profile case, this detail emerged as a key point of contention. While some might view it as an attempt to cloud the narrative and sway a potential jury, it raises pertinent questions about the investigation's thoroughness and fairness.

As Brueski noted, the location of the DNA evidence could significantly affect the interpretation of the findings. He highlighted, "We have to remember this was a party house, a college house... I would not be remotely surprised if there was far more than three male DNAs found in this home that are from different people." The crucial detail, however, is the specific placement of the DNA in relation to the crime scene, rather than its mere presence on the property.

Echoing Brueski's views, Faddis elaborated, "Just the very fact of DNA being somewhere near this crime scene is not overly shocking. But, in their motion, the defense wanted a detailed breakdown of how these DNA conclusions were allegedly drawn that tie Bryan Kohberger to the scene and how they ruled out other potential victims." The defense's request underscores the significance of the DNA's location and connection to the crime.

Interestingly, while the defense points to the discovery of other men's DNA, the prosecution is hinging its case on a DNA sample from a buccal swab provided by Kohberger, which they claim matches the DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene. The prosecution further contends that the genetic genealogy results are inconsequential to the trial and don't influence the determination of Kohberger's guilt or innocence. This stance has drawn skepticism, with Faddis stating, "I'm not certain they have a 100% DNA match of Bryan Kohberger to the knife sheath. And so in terms of how they got there and whether there was some genealogical family tree they used, that stuff is absolutely important to look into for defense."

The defense team uses every possible ground to protect Kohberger's rights and interests. While some of these grounds could be interpreted as valid arguments or attempts to introduce reasonable doubt, there is also the strategic move of preserving every possible issue for a potential appeal later on. This tactic ensures that if Kohberger is convicted, his appellate counsel has ample issues to argue for a new trial.

As the trial progresses, the discourse around DNA evidence and its significance underscores the complexities of reaching a fair and just verdict. Whether the defense's efforts to challenge the DNA evidence will gain traction remains to be seen. The legal proceedings continue to unravel for now, underscoring the intricate interplay between evidence, interpretation, and the pursuit of justice.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

6 min
July 24, 2023 Will Additional DNA Evidence Help Or Hurt Bryan Kohberger's Case?
The trial of Bryan Kohberger, the individual charged in the chilling University of Idaho murder case, continues to unfold, captivating public attention and scrutiny. One development, in particular, has thrown the spotlight on a fascinating question: Could the introduction of additional DNA evidence be the defining factor in Kohberger's case?

Former FBI special agent and behavioral analysis expert Robin Dreeke and true crime podcast host Tony Brueski recently deliberated this conundrum during an episode of Brueski's podcast, Hidden Killers. The two dissected the intricacies of the prosecution and defense's strategies and the potential implications of emerging DNA evidence.

A critical point in Kohberger's case is the discovery of DNA from three men at the murder scene. Intriguingly, none of the genetic samples matched Kohberger's profile, countering the prosecution's case rooted primarily on the DNA from a buccal swab provided by Kohberger. This sample allegedly matched the DNA on a knife sheath at the crime scene.

This new disclosure raises several questions about the investigation's trajectory. Dreeke and Brueski explored the defense's efforts to leverage this evidence. "The defense is doing an amazing job of painting and sowing seeds of doubt, and every day they get an extension is another day for them to do just that," Dreeke explained.

Brueski concurred, adding that the defense's stance on DNA discrepancies could introduce significant doubt in the jurors' minds. He noted, "If I'm taking a pause and saying that's interesting, so will a jury."

The defense's primary argument, however, centers on a fundamental concern. They claim the investigation bore an early confirmation bias, where the investigation, upon discovering DNA evidence implicating Kohberger, may have prematurely dismissed other potential suspects or leads. If perceived as credible by the jury, this possibility could considerably undermine the prosecution's case.

But Dreeke and Brueski also acknowledged that the prosecution's focus on Kohberger could have been driven by mounting pressure from a concerned public and media. Such external influences could have inadvertently catalyzed the formation of a confirmation bias, leading investigators to lean heavily into the strongest leads they had at the time.

The podcast hosts also discussed the possibility of additional DNA evidence coming to light during the trial. As Brueski elaborated, "A lot of people don't explore to see how much meat is on the other end. They're just going to look at the title and go, 'Oh, I heard this.' And that's where it ends. No context."

With access to a wider range of evidence and more intimate knowledge of the investigation's complexities, the prosecution could present additional DNA findings to strengthen its case. However, the defense's current narrative may be informed by their need to work with public knowledge and speculate on undisclosed evidence.

The discussion concluded with a contemplation of the defense's strategy. They agreed that the defense's motive might extend beyond Kohberger's case, intending to demonstrate their commitment to their client and potential future clients. This tactic may lead to the introduction of plea deals or further complications in the trial process.

With the national spotlight on the trial, the question remains: will the additional DNA evidence corroborate the prosecution's narrative, or will it cultivate enough doubt to tilt the case in Kohberger's favor? Dreeke noted, "Innocence and not guilty are not the same things." This statement resonates profoundly in the context of the Kohberger case, reminding us that the path to justice often navigates a complex labyrinth of evidence, interpretation, and, ultimately, human judgment.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

12 min
July 23, 2023 Week in Review-What Kind Of Alibi Will Kohberger's Defense Come Up With?
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

9 min

About The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger

From the publisher's feed

Get ready for a true-crime podcast that will leave you questioning everything with its relentless focus on the capture and prosecution of Bryan Kohbeger - the man accused of committing a quadruple…