The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

    

 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

    

 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski was joined by retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The two discussed the recent waiving of a speedy trial for Bryan Kohberger by his attorney, Anne Taylor. This development raised a lot of speculation on the direction of the case, given that it removed the pressure of the tight October deadline.

 

 "I see her continually trying to do all she can to save his life," Dreeke said, speculating that the defense's actions point to a fear of the death penalty for Kohberger. The case has prompted curiosity regarding the control of the motions being filed; whether it's driven by Taylor, Kohberger, or a combination of both. There have been moments where Taylor's representation seemed exceptionally well-executed, while other times, it raised questions about the origin of certain strategies.

 

 Dreeke provided a unique perspective by comparing the dynamic to an author-writer relationship. "It's as if he's the author and she's his writer," he explained, emphasizing that while Taylor has the expertise, she can only work with the information provided by Kohberger. This dynamic might explain some of the more bizarre defense strategies, such as the 'driving alibi,' or the suggestion that evidence was planted.

 

 These strategies seem uncharacteristic for Taylor, based on her historical representation of clients, but it is suspected that Kohberger's input might be influencing the approach. Despite the limitations, Dreeke commended Taylor for doing her job well under the circumstances. "When you're working with very little, you're going to make the most out of what you can," he noted.

 

 The discussion also touched on the implications of waiving the speedy trial. Initially, Taylor sought small delays while keeping the clock moving toward the trial. However, the decision to waive the speedy trial suggests a change in strategy, possibly due to concerns about a tainted jury and negative media portrayal of Kohberger.

 

 Dreeke speculated that this change in tactic might be a desperate move to keep Kohberger alive as long as possible. "As the ludic of some of these ideas that she and he are coming up with... are kind of flushing out and going nowhere, let's let go of the speedy trial," Dreeke suggested. By prolonging the process, the defense might be hoping for new developments that could work in their favor.

 

 In summary, the waiving of the speedy trial for Bryan Kohberger marks a significant shift in the defense strategy. While the move raises questions about the dynamics between Kohberger and his attorney, Anne Taylor, it is clear that the defense is doing everything possible to avoid the death penalty. As the case progresses, it remains to be seen whether this change in tactic will ultimately benefit Kohberger in the long run.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The National Offender database, which contains the DNA profiles of offenders, has more than 13 million profiles, almost double since 2009. However, there is growing concern about the accuracy of DNA matches and the potential for human error in the system. Forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane revealed alarming error rates in DNA test results on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski.

 

 Krane, who has extensive experience working with DNA databases, expressed his excitement about the potential to identify error rates or determine errors in DNA test results. He cited his involvement in an investigation for the state of Victoria in Australia, where he had access to about 15,000 DNA profiles. "When you did all possible pairwise comparisons of those 15,000 people, what you found is that there were a fair number that matched perfectly at 14 out of 18," Krane explained. "There were fewer that matched at 15 out of 18, but still some, fewer that matched at 16 out of 18, but still some, and then a whole bunch that matched at 17 out of 18, more than matched at 14 out of 18, and then a whole bunch that matched at 18 out of 18."

 

 Krane explained that the only explanation for the ones that matched at 18 out of 18 was that these were people who were entered into the system twice, possibly under an alias. However, the ones that matched at 17 out of 18 indicated that there was a mistake in one of the two times their DNA got entered into the system. This translated into an error rate of one in 300. "And when you're talking about chances of a coincidental match in the quintillions or the bazillions, if you prefer, yet you make a mistake every 300th time that you try to generate a DNA profile, the bazillion number doesn't matter anymore. It gets swapped out by that chance of making a mistake," Krane said.

 

 This error rate is particularly concerning as it means that opportunities to generate useful investigative leads are missed. If a DNA sample is collected from a crime scene and there is no suspect, authorities search the CODIS database to find a match. However, every 300th time this is done, a lead is not generated, which Krane believes is an unacceptably high failure rate given the consequences of having a rapist or a murderer go without being apprehended.

 

 Krane suggested that one way to correct this could be by doing a pairwise comparison of the 13 million profiles in the federal database to determine if errors happen more frequently at one of the locations than others. "Maybe one of those loci just is more error-prone than others. Maybe the biology just doesn't work as well for that one locus. That one location. And when you do your database search, maybe you don't include that one, right? Or maybe you include it and this, but you factor in that you discount it because that one is just more prone to having a mistake," Krane suggested.

 

 Krane also expressed concern about the secrecy surrounding the CODIS database and suggested that more people in the correct positions should have access to it to identify more criminals and solve more cases. He also mentioned the development of probabilistic genotyping systems, expert systems used to interpret test results that human analysts find too complicated. These systems, while not openly shared due to stringent non-disclosure agreements, can distinguish between signal and noise, which is particularly useful when dealing with a small amount of DNA or a sample with many different contributors.

 

 While the expert systems may not explicitly use artificial intelligence (AI), they involve serious computer science undertakings with hundreds of thousands of lines of computer code. These systems may help reduce human error and improve the accuracy of DNA database searches, ultimately helping to catch more criminals and solve more cases.

 

 Krane's insights highlight the need for more transparency and improvement in the system to ensure that DNA databases are used to their fullest potential in solving crimes and catching criminals.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski sat down with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine, to unpack the courtroom behavior of Brian Kohberger. Last week, the court witnessed Kohberger waiving his right to a speedy trial, sparking a myriad of questions about his overall strategy and intentions.

 

During the interview, Constantine remarked on Kohberger's demeanor when answering the judge's questions. "When I'm watching his behavior, he was very convincing," she observed. "He answered the questions, he listened, his voice tone was confident." Kohberger’s assertive responses and the manner he communicated seemed strategic, prompting Constantine to wonder about his overarching legal game plan, especially given the decision to extend the trial.

 

Constantine further discussed the courtroom dynamics, particularly the vigilant role of Kohberger's attorney, who was described as indefatigable in her efforts. "You see his attorney constantly standing up over and over again...she is a real bulldog. For a defendant, you definitely would want to have her as your attorney," commented Constantine. Brueski agreed, noting, "She certainly is spacing this out and making the arguments on his behalf fairly well."

 

However, it’s not just Kohberger’s behavior that’s drawing attention. The defense's strategy seems to be throwing a wide net, planning to bring forth a motion to dismiss based on various reasons, from biased grand juror accusations and alleged inadmissible evidence to claims of prosecutorial misconduct. When asked about this approach, Constantine was straightforward: "I think they're grasping at straws and slinging mud every which way they can."

 

Kohberger’s defense, notably his claimed penchant for nighttime driving, was highlighted as being particularly weak. "That seems to be quite his norm, but that is a horrible defense," Constantine asserted. Given this, the defense's varied tactics could be seen as an attempt to defend their client vigorously, even if their foundations appear shaky.

 

While it might appear that the defense is trying everything to get the trial dismissed, it’s worth noting that even a dismissal based on one of the reasons doesn’t necessarily mean Kohberger would walk free. Brueski explained, "Essentially, if they have an issue with the grand jurors, they would just essentially reconvene another grand jury." This would in effect reset the trial clock.

 

A central point of discussion was the defense’s approach to time. Earlier, there was a sense that the defense attorney, Ann Taylor, was trying to move things along swiftly. Now, there appears to be a strategic slowing down. Constantine believes this might be a tactic to buy time, suggesting, "Buying time to restrategize. That's what she's doing."

 

The conversation rounded out with a focus on the upcoming motion to dismiss and whether Kohberger's alibi would remain central to the defense. Constantine expressed that the judge might be providing Kohberger every possible chance, ensuring all bases are covered. "I think that the judge is giving a lot of leeway in Kohberger's case," she concluded.

 

Kohberger's trial continues to be a riveting spectacle. As it unfolds, many will watch closely, parsing every move, every gesture, and every strategy for a deeper understanding of the case's direction.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with former FBI Special Agent and contributor Jennifer Coffindaffer to unpack the latest developments surrounding the contentious Brian Kohberger trial.

 

 Brian Kohberger, the subject of much media scrutiny, has been facing a series of defense motions, one of which seeks to overturn the grand jury indictment on four significant claims. These range from allegations of biased grand jurors to prosecutorial misconduct. While the public awaits conclusive decisions on these motions, Coffindaffer shared insight into the trajectory of the trial and potential future outcomes.

 

 If the judge does find grounds to dismiss the case based on the defense’s claims, Coffindaffer clarified a common misconception. "Suddenly Kohberger walks," she stated, "is not the case. He still sits in jail based on the probable cause decided upon by the judge pursuant to the initial criminal complaint." This would then lead to the convening of a new grand jury to correct any prior oversights.

 

 In one of the more intriguing turns in the trial, Kohberger's defense is expected to provide evidence regarding an alibi. However, Coffindaffer expressed skepticism about the defense's ability to offer any substantive evidence. "Based on the fact, I don't think they have anything," she remarked. "If they did have something, they would've already presented it."

 

 The trial also witnessed an unusual situation involving the defense's expert witnesses. During one of the hearings, a total of four expert witnesses were brought forward, a tactic that raised eyebrows. The defense's late introduction of these witnesses and their failure to provide comprehensive Curriculum Vitaes in a timely manner was met with apprehension. Coffindaffer noted the judge's leniency, "In the abundance of caution, this judge is going to allow a lot of leeway," suggesting that the judge’s primary concern is to prevent any cause for appeals.

 

 The most significant revelation from the hearing was expert witness Ms. Vargas' subsequent retraction of parts of her testimony. Vargas also allegedly admitted to not reading the entirety of a declaration she signed. Brueski highlighted the unusual nature of such a development, saying, "It just seems very bizarre."

 

 Coffindaffer concurred, emphasizing that such a move is essentially career-ending for an expert witness. She pointed out, "I can't imagine any excuse for either saying something on the stand that you now renounce or if you signed something that you didn't read that didn't contain your expert opinions."

 

 There was also an undertone of sarcasm when discussing the quality and relevancy of some of the defense's chosen experts. "They called an attorney who just has experience litigating cases involving DNA," Coffindaffer said, emphasizing that the defense team already had such expertise in-house. The inclusion of a botanist-turned-self-taught-DNA-expert and the reliance on Vargas, who later recanted her statement, painted a picture of a defense team struggling to find credible experts willing to take their position.

 

 Brueski humorously alluded to the situation by joking, "We have Samantha2468 from TikTok. She's coming on here. She's been following this from the beginning, and she thinks you are innocent."

 

 The episode offered a detailed look into the unfolding legal drama surrounding Brian Kohberger. With the next phase of the trial set for September 8th, all eyes are on the defense's next move and the court's decisions. Whether the defense's tactics are strategic or signs of desperation remains to be seen.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Defense Attorney Bob Motta Breaks Down DNA Arguments in Kohberger Case

 In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delved deep into the ongoing case of Brian Kohberger. The discussion, featuring Defense Attorney Bob Motta of "Defense Diaries," shed light on the complexities surrounding the use of new DNA evidence techniques in court.

 

 At the heart of the matter lies the speedy trial wave, which seems to have been used by Anne Taylor, defense attorney for Kohberger, to buy more time for a closer examination of evidence. One point of contention is the availability of certain evidence, particularly data and research related to IgG, which the state argues is not subject to Rule 17 and is therefore non-discoverable. "Everything that we've been hearing about with the IgG and all that data and the research that she wants, and the state is, you know, claiming, look, it doesn't fall under Rule 17 and we don't have to give it to you," Brueski mentioned.

 

 According to Motta, if Taylor files a motion to suppress based on the IgG information, it is likely to be denied due to the third-party nature of the information source. He explains that traditionally, DNA profiles submitted either to public databases or private ones, such as Ancestry or 23andMe, have required a legal warrant for law enforcement access. However, some people opt to upload their profiles to databases like GEDMatch, which law enforcement can access without a warrant.

 

 Motta points out that this new realm of forensic science presents a unique challenge as the courts grapple with its implications. He said, "This is so brand new that it hasn't been vetted yet."

 

 The issue is rooted in the sharing of the Y STR DNA strand, which can be common to every male in a family lineage. Motta elaborated, "Because of the fact that you share that same Y STR DNA strand with everybody in your familial line, all the way to males in your family line to your great-great-great grandfather... the argument is, do does a defendant who they're not searching him... have standing to say, okay, you needed a warrant to get into that database, searching for essentially my DNA."

 

 He emphasizes the unparalleled nature of this technology, drawing a distinction between voluntarily shared data, such as text messages, and the involuntarily shared genetic markers of distant relatives. "There is nothing voluntary about your distant relatives sharing your DNA. That's just a fact," he affirmed.

 

 There's no doubt that this DNA technology presents law enforcement with a potent tool. But as Motta highlights, while there's immense potential for good, there are also questions about civil rights and liberties. The crux of the matter is the need for a warrant to access such data. This is not about discontinuing its use, but ensuring that it's accessed lawfully.

 

 "Use it, but you have to get a warrant just like you do for anything else," he noted.

 

 As the debate continues, Motta doesn't seem optimistic about Taylor's chances with her motion to suppress based on current legal interpretations. "He'll lose it. But that's how you get to the appellate court," he stated.

 

 Already, states like Maryland have legislated on this issue, but any law is open to interpretation and litigation. As Motta poignantly summed it up, "The whole thing is about interpretation. You have the state interpreting it one way and you have the defense interpreting another way. And then you leave it to a judge to decide."

 

 It remains to be seen how the courts will navigate this new terrain, but one thing is clear: the landscape of forensic science and the law is undergoing a transformation, one case at a time.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the unfolding case of Brian Kohberger, the limelight isn't solely on the defendant but equally on the strategy his defense attorneys are choosing to employ. The recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast featured an insightful discussion between host Tony Brueski and guest Shavaun Scott, a noted psychotherapist and author, about the nuances of Kohberger's defense and the court's reaction to it.

 

A significant development, Brueski notes, is the judge's decision to grant Kohberger's attorneys an additional three weeks to furnish evidence supporting Kohberger's alibi. "The alibi, as it stands, is peculiarly vague," Brueski pointed out. "The defense maintains he has a penchant for nighttime drives. But without corroborative details, such as specific locations or potential witnesses, it raises more questions than it answers."

 

Scott echoed these sentiments, questioning the viability of the alibi itself. "If they had concrete proof, such as a footage of his car far from the crime scene, that would be another matter," she remarked. However, she also speculated about a potential pitfall: "What if the 'nighttime drive' is merely an explanation for why his car was seen near the residence in Moscow?"

 

For Brueski, this 'nighttime drive' defense appeared weak from the outset. "Claiming a penchant for nighttime drives without substantial proof or specificity seems more incriminating than exculpatory. It's now imperative for the defense to determine if relevant footage even exists, given that most surveillance systems have short data retention policies."

 

As the discussion veered toward the courtroom dynamics, Scott and Brueski both showed appreciation for the judge's approach. Brueski remarked, "It almost feels as if the judge is piercing through apparent stall tactics. There seems to be a low tolerance for repetitious arguments that don't bring any substantial value to Kohberger's defense."

 

Scott added her perspective, observing that while some judges can appear indecisive, often influenced by aggressive legal maneuvers, this particular judge seems both clear and fair in his decisions. "There's a sense of clarity and an unmistakable intent to ensure justice without unnecessary delays," she stated.

 

 However, the accelerated pace of the proceedings did raise some concerns. Brueski reflected, "It's commendable how swiftly this case is moving, especially considering the trial is set to commence less than a year after the alleged crimes. Yet, such speed could potentially open doors to appellate issues later on."

 

 In the intricate dance of legal proceedings, the Kohberger case serves as a testament to the challenges of building a defense, especially when it hinges on a seemingly flimsy alibi. With a deadline looming, the next few weeks will be crucial for Kohberger's attorneys to either solidify their stance or reconsider their strategy.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com