The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger

By True Crime TodayNews True Crime News Commentary

Favorites
353
Followers
Typical duration
15 min
per episode
If it hooks
50%
finish an episode

Based on Podcast App listening data

The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger episodes

August 18, 2023 Bryan Kohberger Motion Hearing 8/18/2023 Part 1
During the latest motion hearing concerning Bryan Kohberger, held this past Friday, significant legal tensions surfaced between the prosecution and defense teams. Kohberger's defense attorneys are ardently pressing for additional DNA evidence, a request that has met with sharp resistance from the prosecution.

The prosecuting team confidently countered the defense's demand by emphasizing a stark reality: they cannot furnish evidence that simply does not exist. This assertion underscores the complexities of the case, suggesting that the evidence might either be inconclusive or yet to be comprehensively processed.

Bryan Kohberger stands at the center of a grim narrative, facing severe allegations of having fatally stabbed four students in Idaho. The gravity of these charges ensures that the case has garnered considerable attention from the legal community and the general public alike.

With the trial scheduled for this coming October, both sides are delving deep into the case, ensuring no stone remains unturned. Every piece of evidence, every testimony, and every procedural step will be pivotal in determining Kohberger's fate. As the date draws nearer, it's evident that the defense is striving to compile as exhaustive a collection of evidence as possible to bolster Kohberger's case, even as the prosecution maintains its position.

With the stakes high and the spotlight firmly on the impending trial, legal experts and observers await keenly to see how these dynamics will play out in the courtroom.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
39 min
August 18, 2023 The Day Of Reckoning For The Kohberger Defense
The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense’s strategy and the risks it presents.

Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then."

The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling.

Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger’s defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized.

Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability.

Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger.

"It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward.

The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
7 min
August 18, 2023 Can Kohberger Beat The Evidence Against Him?
In the most recent episode of "Hidden Killers", podcast host Tony Brueski delved into the controversial and perplexing case of Brian Kohberger, alongside Forensic Psychologist Kate Wallinga. Their discourse revolved around the veracity of Kohberger's alibi and how its evolution seems more perplexing than convincing.

Brueski opened the discussion with a tone of bemusement, pointing out the seemingly desperate strategy of Kohberger's defense. "Just throwing randomness into the air is what it feels like. Lately, things that are not based on any sort of fact – claims that are not based in reality, really is what we're talking about here." He emphasized the audacity of the alibi, remarking on the defendant's claim, "Hey, I like to drive at night." A claim made in the face of evidence placing him at the crime scene.

Kate Wallinga chimed in with her perspective on the defendant's mindset. "I think he's probably thinking that well, they can't prove a negative. You know, they can't prove I wasn't doing something… but he's starting to sound like a clown by this point." Wallinga's insight into the psyche of Kohberger portrayed a man with inflated confidence in his intelligence, a trait she found all too common in many inmates.

The conversation took another intriguing turn when Brueski posed a critical question about Kohberger's attorney, Ann Taylor. He wondered aloud about the source of the defense's seemingly erratic strategy, asking, "What I'm wondering is the attorney, Ann Taylor... How many of these statements do you think are coming from her direction and expertise versus it's the client?"

Wallinga, drawing from her familiarity with defense attorneys, posited that Taylor would likely prefer silence at this juncture. "Because anything that she says, whether it's in a deposition or whether it's at a press conference, that becomes fodder for the actual trial," Wallinga pointed out. She highlighted the dangers of being locked into a story before a trial, an angle that could potentially be exploited by the prosecution.

Wallinga's conjecture paints Kohberger as a forceful figure, perhaps directing his lawyer's hand. "He strikes me as the type to say, well, if you don't do it, I'll find somebody else who will. You know, I'll write a letter to the news media, or I'll make a phone call." Wallinga said. Adding another layer, she also touched upon Kohberger's study of criminology, emphasizing how it diverges greatly from forensic psychology and law, and how he might be grappling with this realization.

Brueski, taking the speculation further, contemplated whether Taylor was being manipulated to some extent by Kohberger. He queried, "Is she being held hostage to a certain extent… She's just kind of like, okay you hang yourself if you want." He considered the possibility of an overarching strategy aimed at the cell phone data, seeking to introduce reasonable doubt by poking holes in its accuracy. He noted the paradoxical nature of the alibi, one that simultaneously sounds "ridiculous" but also potentially weakens the cell phone evidence.

Echoing Brueski's sentiments, Wallinga suggested that the defense might be strategically attempting to cut down on the trial's length. She detailed the tedious nature of cell phone data, explaining, "Those of us who watch Dateline or forensics files, we're like, oh yeah. Cell phone tower data, no big deal. But the reality is, in a courtroom, you have to comb through it and be very precise."

In closing, Wallinga summarized the situation aptly: "He's a smart guy who sounds stupid." She alluded to the common fallacy where individuals, although experts in one area, fail to recognize the complexities and nuances of another.

As the Brian Kohberger case unfolds, the podcast discussion highlighted the fascinating interplay between law, psychology, and strategy and how even the most seemingly 'ridiculous' claims can have profound implications in the courtroom.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
7 min
August 17, 2023 Will Character Witnesses At Kohberger Trial Paint A Dark Picture?
In a recent episode of the esteemed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with former Federal prosecutor and attorney Neama Rahmani to delve into the captivating case against Brian Kohberger. With both bringing a unique perspective, the conversation was rife with analysis, questions, and insight into the case's evidence, which is currently shielded by a gag order.

The overarching question is, given the current knowledge, how will the defense handle character testimonies from Kohberger's acquaintances? Rahmani speculates, “They're going to try to keep a lot of that, and what we've seen. The defense in this case... It's going to be two-tiered. They're going to focus on the jury... Oftentimes, they're really looking at those appellate courts, especially in a death penalty case."

Kohberger, as described, doesn’t seem to be a social butterfly. So, the approach to introducing character witnesses can be a double-edged sword. Rahmani cautioned about the pitfalls, stating, "that prior bad acts, evidence 404B character evidence, that's something that appellate courts really take a close look at." The prosecution might be wary of leaning too heavily on character witnesses for fear of later appeals.

Regarding the evidence, Brueski brought up the concerning lack of multiple DNAs at the crime scene. Rahmani chimed in, "For a crime scene that's been so gruesome and horrific and bloody, you'd expect there to be a lot more DNA than just one single source in a knife sheath."

A significant portion of the discussion hovered around Kohberger’s phone records. With potential evidence pointing toward stalking, Brueski ponders the information to be unveiled during the trial. "Are we going to be blown away by information? Is there going to be a treasure trove of planning, of images of stalking on that device?"

Rahmani responded, "Even though there is that broad gag order, this is the biggest case in the country right now... if there was that smoking gun, I would've thought that maybe someone would've reported it because there's so much coverage of this case."

In terms of ensuring impartiality for the upcoming trial in a small town, Rahmani brings up the omnipresence of social media. "Everyone in the world has heard about this case," he asserts, making the selection of an unbiased jury increasingly challenging. "Is the defense going to try to challenge the venue, get things moved? We saw this happen with Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow, the other big Idaho case." Rahmani pointed out the challenges faced in the Chauvin-Floyd case, suggesting that, like in that situation, jury selection for Kohberger's trial could span days, if not weeks.

In conclusion, as the case against Brian Kohberger progresses, new revelations and strategies continue to emerge, painting a clearer picture for the public. Rahmani's insights, combined with Brueski's probing questions, offer a unique and thought-provoking exploration of what's currently known about the case, and what might come next. Only time will tell how the trial unfolds, but with the world watching, the search for justice is palpable.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
5 min
August 16, 2023 Kohberger Defense Goal: Make Jury Think They Are Smarter Than Experts
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski had an engaging discussion with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The subject of their conversation? The defense strategy of Anne Taylor, attorney for Brian Kohberger.

Tony Brueski kicked off the conversation, commenting on the curious trend where people with limited or no expertise in a given field seem to be more confident in challenging experts than ever before. As he put it, "It seems to be a very bizarre thing we have right now where expert opinion doesn't really matter." This was framed within the context of Kohberger possibly influencing his own defense strategy despite lacking a legal background.

Dreeke weighed in on this societal shift, suggesting that the overriding of experts might be "more of a reflection of the mistrust of authority than anything else." This mistrust, he argued, could place undue pressure on professionals to bend to the whims of those who are less informed, lest they face accusations of incompetence or negligence.

One of the main points of contention is the decision by Anne Taylor to challenge cell phone data triangulation as a means to place Kohberger at the scene of the alleged crime. Brueski speculates, "They're gonna poke holes or… really show that [the triangulation] is not accurate."

In essence, if Taylor can create enough doubt around the cell phone data – which might place Kohberger near the scene – then the primary piece of physical evidence against him, a knife sheath, would stand alone. Dreeke shared this sentiment, emphasizing that Taylor's methodology might be to "plant reasonable doubt." He further noted that if there are inconsistencies in the cell phone data, even if they can be attributed to technology's inherent limitations, it might be enough to sway at least one juror.

Dreeke alluded to the psychological aspect of this strategy. Drawing on Robert Green's "Laws of Human Nature", he points out that people often gravitate towards information that validates their own self-perception. If Taylor can tap into this human trait and make jurors feel uniquely perceptive or intelligent for doubting the accepted norm, she could foster a skepticism that benefits her client. "That's an effective strategy," Dreeke opined.

While the duo jested that they might inadvertently be providing Taylor with more ammunition for her defense, they touched on a more profound point about the art of courtroom litigation. As Dreeke insightfully observed, courtroom lawyers, whether prosecutors or defenders, are storytellers. They must balance hard facts with the softer touch of emotion, weaving a narrative that resonates with jurors. For those like Taylor, who may be "light on facts and data", the onus is on them to lean into emotion and sentiment to tip the scales in their favor.

In conclusion, as the legal proceedings in the Brian Kohberger case unfold, it serves as a potent reminder of the dynamic interplay between expertise and public opinion, fact and emotion, in our justice system. The implications of this balance could, as Dreeke and Brueski suggest, have far-reaching consequences for both the accused and the broader public's faith in the judicial process.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

9 min
August 16, 2023 Former Fed Prosecutor Neama Rahmani On Kohberger's Defense Strategy
The case surrounding Bryan Kohberger's alleged involvement in the Idaho quadruple homicide continues to captivate the nation. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski, attorney and former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani shared some insights into the intricacies of Kohberger's defense and the larger strategies at play.

Rahmani started the discussion, highlighting the alibi defense proposed by Kohberger's lawyer, Anne C. Taylor. "I like to go driving at night,” Kohberger claimed. This statement raised eyebrows, with both the podcast host and Rahmani expressing skepticism over its merit. While Taylor's record in handling complex cases remains commendable, some of the defense's statements and alibis have been deemed "borderline crazy."

Rahmani mused, “I don't think this is a real alibi where someone's gonna testify that Bryan Kohberger was with me on the night of the murders.” Instead, the defense's strategy appears to focus on cross-examining the state's evidence, particularly the cell site data.

According to the evidence presented, Kohberger's cell phone signal was traced from Washington State to Idaho, stopping short of the victims' house. This led to speculations that Kohberger might have turned his phone off or left it at a location before purportedly committing the crime. Rahmani anticipates that the defense will argue the cell data is inconsistent with the surveillance evidence related to a Hyundai Elantra and posit that since Kohberger's phone wasn’t at the murder scene, he too wasn’t present.

Brueski then raised the pertinent question about the room for questioning the cell triangulation data. Rahmani, offering a prosecutorial perspective, opined that the cell phone evidence is remarkably precise. "It's very accurate," he asserted, highlighting that such data can trace a person's location within a few feet.

Despite the defense's arguments, Rahmani foresees the prosecution presenting a robust rebuttal. "They're really explaining away the defense's alibi before they've even presented their case," Rahmani noted. He expects the prosecution to stress that Kohberger, a PhD student well-versed in criminal justice and cell phone intricacies, had intentionally turned off his phone. Moreover, Rahmani hinted that even if Kohberger's phone wasn’t at the murder site on the night in question, it had pinged outside the house on multiple other occasions, suggesting a possible "stalking type theory."

But the motive for the brutal murders remains elusive. Although motive isn’t a legal requisite, Rahmani emphasized that juries often seek answers to the “why” behind heinous crimes. Gleaning from the limited information available, Rahmani speculated that the prosecution might present a stalking angle, especially given certain unreplied Instagram messages and reports of Kohberger visiting a restaurant where two victims worked.

In essence, while the defense maneuvers to cast doubt on the cell data, the prosecution looks poised to address these gaps proactively and, possibly, suggest a motive grounded in obsession.

The Kohberger case, with its complexities and the grim nature of the crime, underscores the intricate dance between defense and prosecution. As the trial progresses, both sides will undoubtedly employ every tool and tactic to present their narratives, with truth-seeking as the ultimate objective.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
6 min
August 15, 2023 How Deep & Damning Is The Digital Evidence Against Bryan Kohberger?
In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger’s decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan.

Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims.

Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer.

Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime.

Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources.

Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene.

Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations.

With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal.

"If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski.

Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative.

The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny.

Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming."

This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
9 min
August 15, 2023 The Kohberger Defense: Confuse the Jury
In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski dives deep into the upcoming trial of Brian Kohberger, where the role of expert witnesses has garnered significant attention. Former FBI Special Agent and daily contributor to "Hidden Killers," Jennifer Coffindaffer, shed light on the complexities of using expert witnesses, especially when they provide contrasting testimonies.

Brueski aptly pointed out the potential confusion a jury could face, saying, "You're going to have prosecution coming in with their own experts and... you'll have one set of experts saying this, and then you'll have another set that may say something different." Highlighting the challenge jurors might face in discerning which expert to believe.

Coffindaffer emphasized that when it comes to scientific matters, true experts should mostly align in their opinions because "the science speaks for itself." However, she acknowledges that interpretations can differ, especially in areas like cell phone record analysis or digital forensics, which can lead to discrepancies in testimonies.

Drawing attention to the "Berger case," Coffindaffer highlighted the role of an FBI special agent with unmatched expertise in the field. She stated, "This guy's expertise just is overwhelming compared to the others," emphasizing the weight his testimony might carry in the trial.

A significant revelation in the case has been Kohberger's official alibi - he likes to drive at night. Brueski questioned Coffindaffer on her reaction to this alibi, wondering if the defense lawyer, Anne Taylor, had a deeper strategy or was adhering to Kohberger's wishes. Coffindaffer opined that due to the overwhelming evidence suggesting Kohberger was driving around that night, the defense had no choice but to accept and incorporate it into their strategy. She said, "Because the evidence is so strong, that's what they had to go with."

The strategy, however, might not only be about contesting guilt. Brueski hypothesized two potential defense aims: to eliminate the death penalty or to plant a seed of doubt in at least one juror's mind. This strategy, referred to by Coffindaffer as "muddying the waters", involves presenting information in such a way that jurors might question the evidence, even if slightly.

Coffindaffer also stressed the importance of the DNA evidence, which was found on a sheet related to the case. "At the end of the day, DNA on that sheet should solve the riddle for all the jurors," she stated, suggesting its pivotal role in the trial's outcome.

In essence, the Kohberger trial brings the complexities surrounding using expert witnesses to the forefront. Contrasting testimonies, interpretations, and strategies highlight the challenges jurors face in sifting through the information to arrive at the truth. The episode of "Hidden Killers" provides an insightful overview of these intricacies, setting the stage for what promises to be a closely-watched trial.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
6 min
August 15, 2023 Does Kohberger's Attorney Have ANY Control Over Him?
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions.

Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around.

Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage."

Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have.

A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure."

Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked.

Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked.

However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering."

She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn’t suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it."

As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
5 min
August 15, 2023 Why Kohberger Believes He Has A Strong Alibi
The world of criminal investigation is not just about finding tangible evidence but also about diving deep into the behavioral patterns of suspects to uncover hidden intentions. A recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski provided a compelling insight into the alibi presented by a suspect, Kohberger. Joined by retired FBI Special Agent and former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, the conversation shed light on the intricacies of criminal behavior.

Kohberger's defense claims that he has an affinity for nighttime drives, an alibi that may initially sound benign. But Dreeke, with his extensive background in understanding human behavior, especially from his days of recruiting spies, found this revelation more than a little intriguing. "When I was looking for individuals to recruit," Dreeke elaborated, "the ones that you never suspected would ever betray their country... established a pattern of behavior in their lives... They designed by their daily habits a time gap that they could then substitute something nefarious in."

Drawing parallels, Dreeke noted that Kohberger might have been using this 'night drive' routine to embed potential illicit activities within an established pattern of behavior. By doing so, any suspicious activities would appear less conspicuous, seamlessly blending into his normal routine. The trick, Dreeke suggested, is that "bad guys" frequently "establish a pattern of behavior for their alibi," allowing them to hide crimes within activities they routinely undertake.

The conversation then veered towards whether this 'night drive' alibi was a premeditated strategy on Kohberger's part or a hastily constructed excuse. Brueski questioned its validity: "Do you think this is the alibi he legitimately planned on giving?" Dreeke, while cautioning that he was speculating, surmised that Kohberger's alibi might stem from a misguided "science experiment on how to be a serial killer." He further conjectured that Kohberger might have come across strategies "about how to hide in plain sight" from some reading, attempting to apply it in real life but failing when confronted with the complexities of reality.

The debate didn't end there. Anne Taylor, Kohberger's attorney, was under scrutiny as well. Her strategy—or apparent lack thereof—came under the spotlight, with Brueski wondering aloud if she was "almost being held hostage" by her client's directives. The discourse raised questions about the dynamics between defense attorneys and their clients. Dreeke speculated about the possibility of Taylor being fed a narrative by Kohberger based on ideas he may have read somewhere about crafting the perfect alibi.

Both Brueski and Dreeke seemed perplexed by the seemingly weak defense strategy. They touched upon other instances where defense attorneys, despite their expertise, seemed to be "taking more direction from their clients than they should be." The balance between client collaboration and legal advice is a delicate one, but the consensus seemed to be that defense attorneys shouldn't be overshadowed or directed by their clients, especially if the client's perspective is skewed.

In sum, the conversation on "Hidden Killers" offered a riveting exploration into the complexities of criminal behavior and defense strategies. Through the lens of Kohberger's 'night drive' alibi, listeners were invited to delve deep into the psychological nuances of crime, alibis, and the attorney-client dynamic. Whether Kohberger's alibi stands the test of the investigation remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: in the world of crime and investigation, things are rarely as simple as they seem.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

7 min

About The Idaho Murders | The Case Against Bryan Kohberger

From the publisher's feed

Get ready for a true-crime podcast that will leave you questioning everything with its relentless focus on the capture and prosecution of Bryan Kohbeger - the man accused of committing a quadruple…