orthodontics In summary

Transverse assessment with a CBCT, is it the answer? 5 MINUTE SUMMARY

Listen Later

Join me for a look at CBCT and its use in the diagnosis of the transverse problem, and if it offers the solution to the debated topic. The podcast is based on a lecture by Chun Hsi Chung at this year’s AAO and appraises established methods of assessment, the Curve of Wilson and the WALA ridge line through the lens of a CBCT, as well as how to use a CBCT to assess the maxilla and mandible, which although revealed an ideal measurement, may not be telling the full story.

What is ideal?

inclination 

Curve of Wilson – CBCT study 

  • Vertical distance buccal and lingual cusp, 1mm vertical difference 

  • Buccal inclination upper 5 degrees Alkhatib 2017

  • Lingual inclination lower 12 degrees Alkhatib 2017

    • Andrews WALA ridge 2000

    • Bucco-lingual distance from crown ( FA point) to the most prominent portion of mandibular buccal alveolar bone (coincident with mucogingival junction)

    • Hypothesised teeth over the basal bone , Glass 2019

    • 1st molar = 2mm

    • Ideal mandibular intermolar width FA – FA = WALA-WALA distance minus 4mm

      • Normal width  CBCT

      CBCT age 13 N = 79 Miner 2012

      • Maxilla slightly smaller

      • mid point molar root on lingual bone -1.22 +/- 2.91mm

        • CBCT Age 22.7 years Koo 2017

        • Measure CoR furcation 1st molar Mx – Mn = -0.39+/- 1.87mm

          • CBCT 56 adults normal occlusion  Lee 2022 PENN STUDY

          • Buccal – buccal on crestal bone, furcation, 6s

          • Lingual – lingual crestal furcation 6s

          • Reliable reading on lingual aspect – buccal shelf bone prevents reliable readings

          • Maxilla narrower than mandible -1 +/- 3mm

            • Previous literature  Tamburrino 2010 describes  5mm cortical plate level of furcation buccal aspect, however Lee 2022 showed for males 1.1mm +/- 4.5mm and 1.6mm +/- 2.9mm

              • Without cbct can transverse diagnosis occur?

              • Models = lingual surface at furcation level (4mm vertical below gingival margin) maxillary width slightly narrower than mandible -2+/- 3mm

                • Issue with CBCT for diagnosis

                • Standard Deviation is large = +/- 3mm, range from -4mm-+2mm falls into SD

                  • Issue with study model transverse analysis from 4mm at the gingiva

                  • Not validated

                    • ...more
                    View all episodesView all episodes
                    Download on the App Store
                    orthodontics In summaryBy Farooq Ahmed
                    • 5
                    • 5
                    • 5
                    • 5
                    • 5

                    5

                    7 ratings