
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Simon described the concept of ‘no retention’, the methodology and literature on the topic, with his expert option included.
Conclusion
· Controversial to not wear retainers
· Simon still asks patients to wear retainers
· Interproximal reduction helps but we don’t know why
Classic study
Riedel and Little
· 10 years out of retention
· 70% relapse – require retreatment, 30% no retainers and no treatment needed
· No identifiable factors – therefore to keep teeth straight require retainers
Treatment protocol and retrospective study of no retainers
Aasen EJO 2005
· During treatment
1. Respect lower archform
2. Maintain lower incisor position
3. Overcorrect of rotations
4. Heavy final wire 21x25 SS for 2-3 months
5. Relapse ‘test’: 4 weeks no archwire
· Results
1. After 3 years 1.1mm (Little’s Index)
§ Not significant clinical change
Randomised control trial Lower arch
Tynelius 2010, 2013
· Lower bonded retainer Vs IPR and no retainer
· 2 years = no difference in stability
Randomised control trial Upper arch
Naraghi 2020
· Upper VFR Vs no retainer
· 1 year follow up
o Relapse with retainer 0.4mm
o Relapse without retainer 1.3mm
· Not clinically significant
Post – treatment changes
1. Relapse
2. Age related changes
a. Abdulraheem 2020, 12 year follow up
i. Tooth displacement index
1. 25% = age related
2. 75% orthodontic relapse
Reference
Aasen, T.O. and Espeland, L., 2005. An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 27(3), pp.209-214.
Edman Tynelius, G., Bondemark, L. and Lilja‐Karlander, E., 2013. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in C lass I four premolar extraction cases–stability after 2 years in retention. Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 16(2), pp.105-115.
Naraghi, S., Ganzer, N., Bondemark, L. and Sonesson, M., 2020. Comparison of post-treatment changes with and without retention in adolescents treated for maxillary impacted canines—a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics.
Tsiopas, N., Nilner, M., Bondemark, L. and Bjerklin, K., 2013. A 40 years follow-up of dental arch dimensions and incisor irregularity in adults. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 35(2), pp.230-235
Abdulraheem, S., Schütz-Fransson, U. and Bjerklin, K., 2020. Teeth movement 12 years after orthodontic treatment with and without retainer: relapse or usual changes?. European Journal of Orthodontics, 42(1), pp.52-59
5
77 ratings
Simon described the concept of ‘no retention’, the methodology and literature on the topic, with his expert option included.
Conclusion
· Controversial to not wear retainers
· Simon still asks patients to wear retainers
· Interproximal reduction helps but we don’t know why
Classic study
Riedel and Little
· 10 years out of retention
· 70% relapse – require retreatment, 30% no retainers and no treatment needed
· No identifiable factors – therefore to keep teeth straight require retainers
Treatment protocol and retrospective study of no retainers
Aasen EJO 2005
· During treatment
1. Respect lower archform
2. Maintain lower incisor position
3. Overcorrect of rotations
4. Heavy final wire 21x25 SS for 2-3 months
5. Relapse ‘test’: 4 weeks no archwire
· Results
1. After 3 years 1.1mm (Little’s Index)
§ Not significant clinical change
Randomised control trial Lower arch
Tynelius 2010, 2013
· Lower bonded retainer Vs IPR and no retainer
· 2 years = no difference in stability
Randomised control trial Upper arch
Naraghi 2020
· Upper VFR Vs no retainer
· 1 year follow up
o Relapse with retainer 0.4mm
o Relapse without retainer 1.3mm
· Not clinically significant
Post – treatment changes
1. Relapse
2. Age related changes
a. Abdulraheem 2020, 12 year follow up
i. Tooth displacement index
1. 25% = age related
2. 75% orthodontic relapse
Reference
Aasen, T.O. and Espeland, L., 2005. An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 27(3), pp.209-214.
Edman Tynelius, G., Bondemark, L. and Lilja‐Karlander, E., 2013. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in C lass I four premolar extraction cases–stability after 2 years in retention. Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 16(2), pp.105-115.
Naraghi, S., Ganzer, N., Bondemark, L. and Sonesson, M., 2020. Comparison of post-treatment changes with and without retention in adolescents treated for maxillary impacted canines—a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics.
Tsiopas, N., Nilner, M., Bondemark, L. and Bjerklin, K., 2013. A 40 years follow-up of dental arch dimensions and incisor irregularity in adults. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 35(2), pp.230-235
Abdulraheem, S., Schütz-Fransson, U. and Bjerklin, K., 2020. Teeth movement 12 years after orthodontic treatment with and without retainer: relapse or usual changes?. European Journal of Orthodontics, 42(1), pp.52-59