
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


【聊了什么】
谎言,是人类社会的润滑剂,还是效率的绊脚石?是一种自我保护的自由,还是滋生不公的温床?当「我没问题」「收到」「您说得对」背后真实的吐槽被强制公之于众,你的职场生活会更好还是更坏呢?《选修课》「如果宇宙」思想实验系列,再次撕开现实的口子,邀请你一同推想一个“无谎职场”。
我们探讨了当“防御性谎言”和“心照不宣的潜规则”消失后,一系列连锁反应将如何展开:预算博弈的“囚徒困境”能否被终结?等级森严的组织中,是会催生出更强的个体,还是会强迫人们将“崇拜”内化为真实信仰?从语言学的角度看,当隐喻与模糊性被视为不诚实,我们的沟通能力是否会被根本性地剥夺?00后新人为何期盼一个没有潜规则的世界?而体制内的“防御性表演”又将在绝对诚实面前何去何从?当情绪价值被重新估量,当“演戏”不再可能,我们究竟离一个更好的职场更近了,还是更远了?
Are lies the lubricant of human society or the stumbling block of efficiency? Are they a form of self-protection and personal freedom, or the breeding ground of injustice? When everyday workplace phrases like “I’m fine,” “Got it,” and “You’re right” are forced to give way to the truth behind the polite facades, will your work life become better—or worse?
In this episode of Elective Course's “What If Universe” thought experiment series, we once again tear open a crack in reality and invite you to imagine a world with no lies at work.
We explore the chain reactions that could follow the disappearance of "defensive lies" and unspoken workplace rules:
From a linguistic standpoint, if metaphors and ambiguity are deemed dishonest, are we fundamentally robbed of our ability to communicate? Why do Gen Z newcomers long for a workplace without unspoken rules? And in the bureaucracy, what happens to “defensive performances” when absolute honesty becomes the norm?
When emotional labor is reassessed and there’s no room left for “performing,” are we getting closer to a better workplace—or drifting further away?
【时间轴】
00:00 “如果宇宙”系列,设定脑洞“如果上班不能说谎”。
05:30 四位主播背景介绍(投资人、科研学者、体制内、00后新人)
08:00 体制内财务预算的“防御性表演”(虚报预算)和资源申请虚报的“囚徒困境”
20:24 对上级的表面崇拜和讨好全部消失,会增加还是减少情绪消耗?
31:41 演戏是否算说谎?
41:15 无谎会否带来更多PUA和画饼)?
48:07 上位者在现有潜规则下获得了什么?
55:06 从语言学角度看,“不许说谎”约等于“不许说话”??
59:32 为何透明高效的模式未成为主流?
00:00 "What If" series: Thought experiment — What if you couldn't lie at work?
05:30 Backgrounds of the four hosts: investor, academic researcher, government employee, Gen Z newcomer
08:00 "Defensive performances" in government budgeting (inflated numbers) and the “prisoner’s dilemma” of resource applications
20:24 If all superficial flattery and fake admiration toward superiors disappear, will emotional exhaustion increase or decrease?
31:41 Is "acting" considered a form of lying?
41:15 Will a no-lies workplace lead to more workplace gaslighting and empty promises?
48:07 What do those in power gain from the current implicit rules?
55:06 From a linguistic perspective, does “no lying” mean “no talking”?
59:32 Why hasn’t the transparent and efficient model become mainstream?
【我们是谁 The Who】
选修课 Universus 是一档分享和探讨泛文化话题的中文播客,脱胎于2013年创办的纽约文化沙龙。
选修课 Universus is a Chinese-language podcast created by the same people who founded the New York Chinese Cultural Salon (纽约文化沙龙)in 2013.
【买咖啡 Please Support Us】
如果喜欢这期节目并愿意想要给我们买杯咖啡:
If you like our show and want to support us, please consider the following:
By Zhichen Zhao5
88 ratings
【聊了什么】
谎言,是人类社会的润滑剂,还是效率的绊脚石?是一种自我保护的自由,还是滋生不公的温床?当「我没问题」「收到」「您说得对」背后真实的吐槽被强制公之于众,你的职场生活会更好还是更坏呢?《选修课》「如果宇宙」思想实验系列,再次撕开现实的口子,邀请你一同推想一个“无谎职场”。
我们探讨了当“防御性谎言”和“心照不宣的潜规则”消失后,一系列连锁反应将如何展开:预算博弈的“囚徒困境”能否被终结?等级森严的组织中,是会催生出更强的个体,还是会强迫人们将“崇拜”内化为真实信仰?从语言学的角度看,当隐喻与模糊性被视为不诚实,我们的沟通能力是否会被根本性地剥夺?00后新人为何期盼一个没有潜规则的世界?而体制内的“防御性表演”又将在绝对诚实面前何去何从?当情绪价值被重新估量,当“演戏”不再可能,我们究竟离一个更好的职场更近了,还是更远了?
Are lies the lubricant of human society or the stumbling block of efficiency? Are they a form of self-protection and personal freedom, or the breeding ground of injustice? When everyday workplace phrases like “I’m fine,” “Got it,” and “You’re right” are forced to give way to the truth behind the polite facades, will your work life become better—or worse?
In this episode of Elective Course's “What If Universe” thought experiment series, we once again tear open a crack in reality and invite you to imagine a world with no lies at work.
We explore the chain reactions that could follow the disappearance of "defensive lies" and unspoken workplace rules:
From a linguistic standpoint, if metaphors and ambiguity are deemed dishonest, are we fundamentally robbed of our ability to communicate? Why do Gen Z newcomers long for a workplace without unspoken rules? And in the bureaucracy, what happens to “defensive performances” when absolute honesty becomes the norm?
When emotional labor is reassessed and there’s no room left for “performing,” are we getting closer to a better workplace—or drifting further away?
【时间轴】
00:00 “如果宇宙”系列,设定脑洞“如果上班不能说谎”。
05:30 四位主播背景介绍(投资人、科研学者、体制内、00后新人)
08:00 体制内财务预算的“防御性表演”(虚报预算)和资源申请虚报的“囚徒困境”
20:24 对上级的表面崇拜和讨好全部消失,会增加还是减少情绪消耗?
31:41 演戏是否算说谎?
41:15 无谎会否带来更多PUA和画饼)?
48:07 上位者在现有潜规则下获得了什么?
55:06 从语言学角度看,“不许说谎”约等于“不许说话”??
59:32 为何透明高效的模式未成为主流?
00:00 "What If" series: Thought experiment — What if you couldn't lie at work?
05:30 Backgrounds of the four hosts: investor, academic researcher, government employee, Gen Z newcomer
08:00 "Defensive performances" in government budgeting (inflated numbers) and the “prisoner’s dilemma” of resource applications
20:24 If all superficial flattery and fake admiration toward superiors disappear, will emotional exhaustion increase or decrease?
31:41 Is "acting" considered a form of lying?
41:15 Will a no-lies workplace lead to more workplace gaslighting and empty promises?
48:07 What do those in power gain from the current implicit rules?
55:06 From a linguistic perspective, does “no lying” mean “no talking”?
59:32 Why hasn’t the transparent and efficient model become mainstream?
【我们是谁 The Who】
选修课 Universus 是一档分享和探讨泛文化话题的中文播客,脱胎于2013年创办的纽约文化沙龙。
选修课 Universus is a Chinese-language podcast created by the same people who founded the New York Chinese Cultural Salon (纽约文化沙龙)in 2013.
【买咖啡 Please Support Us】
如果喜欢这期节目并愿意想要给我们买杯咖啡:
If you like our show and want to support us, please consider the following:

1,647 Listeners

112,426 Listeners

325 Listeners

929 Listeners

259 Listeners

471 Listeners

133 Listeners

292 Listeners

158 Listeners

1,112 Listeners

64 Listeners

4,214 Listeners

18 Listeners

8 Listeners

10 Listeners

3 Listeners