Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

By True Crime TodayNewsTrue CrimeNews Commentary
Download on the App Store

Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers episodes

  • Does Wife Of Accused LISK Killer Rex Heuerman, Asa Ellerup, Have Untreated Mental Health Issues? -WEEK IN REVIEW
    Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
        
     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
        
     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

     Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    6 min
  • Does Wife Of Accused LISK Killer Rex Heuerman, Asa Ellerup, Have Untreated Mental Health Issues?
    In the ever-evolving saga of the Long Island serial killer, new developments continue to cast a long shadow over the truth, challenging perceptions and demanding a deeper investigation into those closest to the accused, Rex Heuermann. The latest chapter unfolds as Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delves into the complex narrative surrounding Heuermann's wife, Asa Ellerup, and the persistent scrutiny from attorney John Ray, a vocal advocate for the victims' families.

    As Heuermann faces charges linking him to the heinous acts on Gilgo Beach, attention turns once again to Ellerup, whose alibis and actions—or lack thereof—have become a focal point in the court of public opinion and investigative interest. The couple's history, intertwined with the timeline of the murders, paints a picture of enigma and potential complicity that begs further examination.

    John Ray's persistence in highlighting discrepancies in Ellerup's whereabouts during the crimes has brought to light questions that demand answers. His "gumshoe" efforts have unearthed details that suggest the narrative presented by Ellerup and her legal representation may not be as cut-and-dry as it appears. With each new piece of evidence or contradiction revealed, the need for a thorough investigation into Ellerup's role, knowledge, or absence becomes increasingly apparent.

    Joining Brueski in this latest discussion is Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author, whose insights into the psychological underpinnings of the case add depth to the conversation. Scott underscores the importance of scrutinizing Ellerup's claims and the mental health aspects that could play a role in her behavior and responses to the allegations against her husband.

    The discourse around the credibility of Ellerup's alibis—bolstered by bank statements and hotel records—raises significant questions about the standard of evidence and investigation in such a high-profile case. The reliance on financial transactions as proof of innocence in the face of a series of brutal murders seems insufficient and simplistic, prompting a call for more comprehensive investigative measures.

    Amid the swirling allegations and investigations, the dynamic within the Ellerup household, especially in light of a documentary crew's presence, becomes a point of speculation. Scott posits that Ellerup's behavior, marked by a lack of empathy for the victims and aggressive reactions to law enforcement's actions, may hint at underlying mental health issues. This perspective sheds light on the complexity of her character and the potential impact of such factors on the case.

    The public's fascination with the case, coupled with the media's attention, has placed Ellerup in a unique position. Yet, her seemingly indifferent stance toward the gravity of the situation and the absence of a proactive approach to clear her name or express solidarity with the victims' families adds layers of suspicion and intrigue.

    As Brueski and Scott peel back the layers of this intricate case, the conversation underscores the necessity of a deeper dive into Ellerup's involvement, knowledge, or indifference regarding her husband's alleged crimes. The call for a more detailed examination of her alibis, mental health, and overall behavior is a testament to the complexity of human psychology and the intricacies of criminal investigations.

    In closing, the discussion leaves listeners with a lingering question: In the shadow of unspeakable horror, what truths remain hidden within the walls of the Ellerup household, and how will the unfolding investigation bring these secrets to light? As the Long Island serial killer case continues to unfold, the search for clarity, justice, and understanding presses on, challenging investigators, commentators, and the public to look beyond the surface and confront the unsettling depths of human nature and criminality.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    6 min
  • Will More Time or A Change of Venue Have ANY Impact On Bryan Kohberger Case?
    In a legal saga that has gripped the nation, the case against Bryan Kohberger, accused of the tragic murders of four University of Idaho students, has taken yet another turn. The defense team, led by attorney Ann Taylor, is pushing for a change of venue, postponing any discussion on the matter until late April at the earliest. This maneuver adds another layer to a case already shrouded in complexity and public scrutiny.
     
     Shavaun Scott, a seasoned psychotherapist and author, weighed in on the strategy during a recent episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski. Their conversation shed light on the psychological underpinnings of such legal tactics and their potential impact on the trial's outcome and public perception.
     
     Scott lauds Taylor's relentless effort to delay the trial, emphasizing the defense's tactical advantage in seeking more time. The request to relocate the trial, citing "extensive inflammatory pretrial publicity," raises significant questions about the influence of media coverage and public opinion on the fairness of the judicial process. In today's digital age, where news spreads rapidly across social media platforms, does the location of a trial still matter?
     
     Brueski likens the modern spread of information to the impact of a nuclear bomb, suggesting that in the wake of such extensive coverage, virtually no place in the United States, especially near Moscow, Idaho, would offer a jury untainted by preconceived notions about the case. Scott agrees, doubting the efficacy of a venue change in ensuring an impartial jury, given the national attention the case has received. It's a "story that's horrifying and fascinating," she notes, capturing the attention of people everywhere, making it nearly impossible to find jurors without some knowledge or opinion on the matter.
     
     The discussion then shifts to the broader implications of delaying the trial. Both Brueski and Scott explore the potential benefits and pitfalls of prolonging the legal process. On one hand, delays can complicate the prosecution's efforts, as witnesses' memories fade and evidence potentially becomes less reliable over time. On the other hand, the defense might unearth new evidence or develop strategies that could sway the jury in Kohberger's favor.
     
     The psychological impact of such delays on the victims' families is also a critical concern. While the defense's tactics might be seen as a bid for a fair trial, they prolong the agony for families seeking closure. Scott reflects on the balance between legal rights and the emotional toll on those directly affected by the crimes, highlighting the delicate task judges face in navigating these waters.
     
     Moreover, the conversation delves into the possibility that, with time, public outrage and emotional intensity surrounding the case may diminish. This could, theoretically, benefit Kohberger by softening the impact of pretrial publicity on potential jurors. However, Scott and Brueski also consider the counterargument presented by the prosecutor, asserting that the community which bore the brunt of the tragedy has the right to see justice served within its jurisdiction.
     
     In concluding, the discussion raises a critical question that lingers in the minds of many: Can a change of venue truly guarantee a fair trial in a case that has captivated and horrified the nation? Or is it merely a strategic delay, a play in the complex game of legal chess that defines high-profile criminal trials?
     
     As the Bryan Kohberger case continues to unfold, with its myriad legal and psychological intricacies, one thing remains clear: the path to justice is fraught with challenges, both in the courtroom and in the court of public opinion. Whether these latest legal maneuvers will benefit or hinder the pursuit of justice remains to be seen, leaving observers and participants alike pondering the ultimate cost of such strategies on the judicial process and those most deeply affected by the tragedy.

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    7 min
  • Will Harsh Punishments For Parents Curb Child School Shooters?
    In the wake of the tragic school shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan, where Ethan Crumbley took the lives of four students, the legal spotlight has turned not only on the perpetrator but also on his parents, Jennifer and James Crumbley. Charged with involuntary manslaughter, the Crumbleys' trial poses a critical question: Can, and should, parents be held accountable for the actions of their children, especially when those actions lead to tragedy?

    Joining Tony Brueski on the podcast "Hidden Killers," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott delves into the complexities of this landmark case, pondering its potential to set a precedent for parental responsibility in the context of gun violence in America. "It's a tricky issue," Scott admits, highlighting the fine line between holding parents accountable and overextending the reach of legal responsibility.

    At the heart of the debate is the access to firearms by minors, a contentious issue given the alarming statistic that gun violence is the leading cause of death among children aged one to nineteen in the United States. Scott references a survey revealing a stark disconnect between parents' beliefs about their children's access to firearms and the reality reported by the children themselves. This discrepancy underscores a broader problem: the ease with which children can access weapons in the home, often with devastating consequences.

    Scott draws parallels between the push for stricter drunk driving laws and the potential impact of safe storage laws for firearms, suggesting that legislative action can indeed reduce incidents of gun violence. However, the question remains: Would any law have altered the Crumbleys' behavior or prevented their son's violent outburst?

    The conversation shifts to the need for comprehensive support systems for families and the implementation of threat assessment teams in schools, a measure aimed at identifying and intervening with students who exhibit warning signs of violence. Scott advocates for these teams, which combine mental health professionals with law enforcement, to assess and manage potential threats before they escalate into violence.

    Yet, the challenge of intervening in the home environment looms large. Even with legislation and school-based intervention programs, the autonomy of adults within their homes and the cultural resistance to perceived intrusions on gun ownership and parental rights complicate efforts to prevent future tragedies. "Incompetence isn't illegal," Brueski points out, highlighting the difficulty of legislating against parental negligence or ignorance.

    As the Crumbley trial unfolds, it not only seeks justice for the victims of the Oxford High School shooting but also tests the waters for a new era of accountability. Will the outcome spur legislative action aimed at preventing access to firearms by troubled youth? And more broadly, will it catalyze a shift in societal attitudes toward gun safety and parental responsibility?

    The implications of the Crumbley trial extend beyond the courtroom, touching on deep-seated issues of gun culture, mental health, and the role of parents in safeguarding their children and communities. As Scott and Brueski ponder the potential for change, the conversation leaves us with a lingering question: In a nation grappling with the scourge of school shootings, can we afford not to take every possible step to prevent the next tragedy?

    As the debate over parental responsibility and gun control continues, the Crumbley trial may indeed mark a turning point. But whether it will lead to meaningful action remains to be seen. In the meantime, the tragedy at Oxford High School serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need to address the root causes of gun violence in America and the collective responsibility we share in ensuring the safety of our children.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    13 min
  • How Do You Legislate Stupidity In The Case Of School Shooter Mom Jennifer Crumbley?
    How Do You Legislate Stupidity In The Case Of School Shooter Mom Jennifer Crumbley
    In a courtroom drama that may well redefine the contours of parental responsibility, Jennifer Crumbley stands trial for her part in a tragedy that left four students dead at Oxford High School in Michigan. Charged with involuntary manslaughter, alongside her husband James, for their son Ethan Crumbley's harrowing act, the case pierces the heart of a national crisis: the recurring nightmare of school shootings.

    But could this trial set a precedent that stretches beyond this single incident, reshaping the landscape of gun ownership and parental oversight? Psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott joined Tony Brueski on "Hidden Killers" to explore the profound implications of this landmark case. "It's a tricky issue," Scott begins, acknowledging the delicate balance between safeguarding children and overburdening parents with the weight of potential legal repercussions for their child's actions.

    The Crumbley case strikes at the core of an American epidemic: gun violence as the leading cause of death among children ages one to nineteen. Scott points to a stark variable distinguishing the United States from the rest of the world: "easy access to firearms." She cites a revealing survey where 70% of gun-owning parents believed their children couldn't access their firearms, yet interviews with their children told a different story. One third claimed they could retrieve the gun in under five minutes, and another 50% said they could do so within an hour.

    "This is carnage," Scott asserts, describing the collective trauma inflicted on American society by the specter of school shootings. The frequency of these tragedies, she argues, has led to a state of cultural PTSD, driving some parents to homeschool their children out of fear. The Crumbley trial, therefore, represents a critical juncture in confronting this crisis head-on.

    The evidence against Jennifer Crumbley, as detailed by Scott, paints a damning portrait of parental negligence. Ethan Crumbley was not just a troubled teenager; he was a young man tormented by violent fantasies and hallucinations, known to have harmed small animals and even harbored plans to abduct, torture, and rape a classmate. Despite these glaring red flags, his parents' response was to gift him a firearm for his 15th birthday—a decision that would have catastrophic consequences.

    Scott is unequivocal in her belief that parents like the Crumbleys must be held accountable. "This really is a glaring case where I think we've got to hold parents responsible," she says. Her stance is informed by a career spent studying violence and its prevention, where she has seen the lethal combination of accessible firearms and untreated mental illness time and again.

    The broader issue, Scott suggests, lies in the American culture's unique relationship with guns. Unlike other countries that face similar challenges with mental health and internet exposure, the U.S. stands alone in its number of firearms exceeding its population. The solution, in her view, lies not only in addressing mental health care and internet culture but in confronting the easy access to guns that has enabled such tragedies.

    As the trial unfolds, the question remains: Can the legal system legislate against parental negligence in the face of clear warning signs, or is this an attempt to legislate against "stupidity," as Brueski puts it? The Crumbley case may indeed set a precedent, but the broader challenge of preventing future tragedies requires a multifaceted approach, addressing the root causes of America's gun violence epidemic.

    In a nation grappling with the consequences of its gun culture, the Crumbley trial forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about responsibility, oversight, and the measures necessary to protect our children. As we await the verdict, one question looms large: Will this case mark a turning point in our collective effort to stem the tide of school shootings, or will it be a mere footnote in the ongoing saga of America's struggle with gun violence?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    6 min
  • How Did Only One Alex Murdaugh Juror Feel Influenced By Becky Hill?
    In a recent turn of events that continues to grip the nation, the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh took another twist with Judge Toal denying a retrial for the disgraced South Carolina lawyer, despite a juror's testimony suggesting influence by Becky Hill, the clerk of court. This decision raises profound questions about the justice system, jury influence, and the psychological aspects of legal proceedings. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into these complexities with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author, shedding light on the psychological underpinnings and implications of this pivotal moment in the Murdaugh case.
    The crux of the discussion centered on Judge Toal's decision to deny a retrial for Murdaugh, despite Juror Z's admission that Hill's comments had influenced their guilty verdict. Scott, expressing a mixture of expectation and personal relief at the decision, highlighted the emotional toll the trial has taken on those following the case closely. "I just don't want to see us all go through that again," Scott admitted, emphasizing the personal bias that comes with such emotionally charged cases.
    Becky Hill's role in the trial has been a point of contention, with her actions deemed "incredibly unprofessional" by Scott. The conversation explored the nuanced reality that jurors, like all individuals, are constantly influenced by their environment and unconscious biases. Scott pointed out the difficulty in acknowledging these influences, noting it's "rather remarkable that that juror was able to be honest and recognize that there was an influence there."
    A key issue in the debate over whether to grant a retrial was the emphasis on Hill's intent. Brueski and Scott discussed the problematic nature of this focus, questioning the relevance of intent when the influence on the juror's decision was evident. This led to broader reflections on the qualifications and psychological insight—or lack thereof—of judges in the legal system. "Judges, they're not psychologists," Brueski remarked, suggesting a gap in the system where psychological understanding is crucial yet often absent.
    The discussion also ventured into potential solutions for the systemic issues highlighted by the case. Scott lamented the national problem of judges lacking psychological insight, especially in sensitive areas like child custody. While there seems to be no easy fix, the conversation underscored the importance of educating judges on psychological dynamics to improve decision-making in court.
    Looking forward, the conversation shifted to Murdaugh's prospects in the appellate courts. Scott speculated on the slim chance of overturning Judge Toal's decision, given the stringent criteria set for proving jury tampering. Yet, both Brueski and Scott acknowledged the importance of ensuring procedural correctness, even if it means revisiting the traumatic details of the Murdaugh trial.
    The dialogue concluded with speculative thoughts on the broader implications of the case for South Carolina's legal system. Scott suggested that the acceptance of jury influence by figures like Hill might be indicative of a cultural norm within the state's courts—a norm that this high-profile case has brought to light.
    In sum, the denial of a retrial for Alex Murdaugh raises as many questions as it answers. While the decision may offer temporary relief to those dreading another emotionally charged trial, it also exposes deep-seated issues within the justice system, from the qualifications of judges to the potential for jury manipulation. As this saga continues to unfold, one question lingers: How will this case shape the future of legal proceedings in South Carolina and beyond?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    10 min
  • What 'Kind' Of Psychopath Is Scott Peterson? -WEEK IN REVIEW
    Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
        
     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
        
     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

     Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    12 min
  • Is Judge Gull In The Delphi Case Incapable Of Being Impartial? -WEEK IN REVIEW
    Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
        
     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
        
     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

     Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    9 min
  • Will The Kohberger Verdict Be Decided BEFORE Jury Selection Even Begins? -WEEK IN REVIEW
    Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
        
     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
        
     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

     Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    7 min
  • Does Chad Daybell Need An Attorney That Is Truly Qualified To Defend His Life? -WEEK IN REVIEW
    Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
        
     This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
        
     Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

     Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    7 min

About Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

From the publisher's feed

Welcome to Mind Behind The Crime, the authoritative podcast that grants you exclusive access to the profound insights of respected psychologists, psychotherapists, and mental health experts as they…

More shows like Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

20/20 by ABC News

20/20

11,937 Listeners

48 Hours by 48 Hours

48 Hours

10,763 Listeners

Crime Stories with Nancy Grace by iHeartPodcasts and CrimeOnline

Crime Stories with Nancy Grace

8,564 Listeners

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch by R. Scott Reisch

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

507 Listeners

Dateline NBC by NBC News

Dateline NBC

46,903 Listeners

Court TV Podcast by Court TV

Court TV Podcast

1,069 Listeners

The Emily Show by Baker Media, LLC.

The Emily Show

1,992 Listeners

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews by Real Story Media

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

612 Listeners

Pretty Lies And Alibis by GiGi McKelvey

Pretty Lies And Alibis

1,561 Listeners

Murder Sheet by MurderSheet

Murder Sheet

136 Listeners

Surviving the Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime by Surviving the Survivor

Surviving the Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime

1,168 Listeners

The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery | Criminally Obsessed by Anne Emerson, Charlie Condon, Drew Tripp, Daniel Michener, Maxwell Harrison

The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery | Criminally Obsessed

1,205 Listeners

The Consult: Real FBI Profilers by PodcastOne

The Consult: Real FBI Profilers

1,347 Listeners

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns by Hidden Killers Podcast

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

95 Listeners

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary by True Crime Today

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

905 Listeners

The Murder Of Stephen Smith by True Crime Today

The Murder Of Stephen Smith

23 Listeners

The Gilgo Beach Murders: The Case Against Rex Heuermann by True Crime Today

The Gilgo Beach Murders: The Case Against Rex Heuermann

94 Listeners

Nightmare In Wisconsin: Taylor Shabusiness Trial by True Crime Today

Nightmare In Wisconsin: Taylor Shabusiness Trial

10 Listeners

Malevolent Mormon Mommys | The Case Against Ruby Franke & Jodi Hildebrandt by True Crime Today

Malevolent Mormon Mommys | The Case Against Ruby Franke & Jodi Hildebrandt

62 Listeners

The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs by The Downfall Of Diddy

The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs

225 Listeners

The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential by NBC10 Boston

The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential

317 Listeners

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe by True Crime Today

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

608 Listeners

Pure Evil: The Sentencing Of Aiden Fucci by True Crime Today

Pure Evil: The Sentencing Of Aiden Fucci

8 Listeners

Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes | The Dennis Rader Story by True Crime Today

Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes | The Dennis Rader Story

7 Listeners

The Murder Of Maddie Soto by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Murder Of Maddie Soto

17 Listeners

The Suitcase Murder | The Trial Of Sarah Boone by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Suitcase Murder | The Trial Of Sarah Boone

5 Listeners

Justice For Harmony | The Trial Of Adam Montgomery by Hidden Killers Podcast

Justice For Harmony | The Trial Of Adam Montgomery

12 Listeners

The Mysterious Murder Of Dr. John Forsyth by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Mysterious Murder Of Dr. John Forsyth

6 Listeners

The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore

6 Listeners

Who Killed 2Pac? | The Murder of Tupac Shakur by True Crime Today

Who Killed 2Pac? | The Murder of Tupac Shakur

8 Listeners

Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield by Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield

Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield

829 Listeners

The Trial Of Barry Morphew by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Trial Of Barry Morphew

6 Listeners