Join me for a podcast exploring the limits of
orthodontic tooth movement. This podcast is a summary of two intriguing
lectures, by Dr Yanqi Yang and Carlos Flores Mir from this year’s International
Orthodontic Symposium by the IOF. This podcast explore the anatomical and
periodontal boundaries of orthodontic tooth movement
Distalisation: Alveolar boundary lower
Horizontal: Atrophic ridge.
Vertical: Maxillary sinus
boundary for lower molar distalization.
Coronal level: Anterior border of
Apex level: lingual plate
Variable – distance from second
molar distal root and inner lingual cortex
Favourable Class 3 greater retromolar
space, class 2 least Fan 2022
Unfavourable High angle have
shorter distance Kim 2021, Victoria 2022
Side effects of lower molar distalisation
Distalisation achieved at apical
level approximately 1mm AJODO 2016
Lingual plate contact 1/3 of cases Kim
Horizontal movement: atrophic ridge
Change in width and height of
Loss of 40-60% width and height
Mostly within 6 months Schrepp 2003
Changes when orthodontic tooth
movement into atrophic edentulous site
Increase bone height 2.2-5.2mm,
duration 24 months Elif 2004
Increase in width 0.8-1.6mm
Greater height increase buccally,
less lingually Dos Santos 2017
Root resorption – lateral
Slight in all cases, thinning of
alveolar bone Patricia dos Santos 2017
Reduced bone height compared to
Maxillary sinus prevent tooth
Increased tipping, slower rate of tooth
No difference in relapse, vitality
or periodontal differences
6 buccal roots closest . (Qin et al
Maxillary sinus remodels itself
Increase in resistance to tooth
movement, greater tipping.
Carlos Flores Mir started the topic with a thought proving
question, that we are well aware of Proffit’s envelope of lower incisor dental
movements; but the question of what
is the periodontal limit, is still yet to be clearly defined.
The difference between the gingival biotype and phylotype,
there has been a focus on biotype but it
Biotype – thickness of gingiva in
Phenotype – contour gingiva,
underlying bony architecture, and width of keratinised tissue
Thin gingival biotypes are likely to have more chances
Extraction Vs non-extraction: in
both scenario the bone height decreases, but in different locations, anterior
extraction treatment = 2mm reduction, non-extraction = 1.2mm. www.orthoinsummary.com/blog
Dehiscence exist pre treatment
Thicker the gingiva, the better Yared
Initial position of the tooth
decides its periodontal future
Thickness varies in various areas
Oral hygiene major factor of
Aren’t really telling us the whole
Size of the image of a CBCT is
limited by the radiation dose, and typically is 0.3-0.6mm3 of voxel size
Tissue less than 0.6mm appears as a
absent in CBCT giving false positive results ( Redua 2020)
Lower incisor proclination and recession:
Systematic review Kalina no correlation
between proclination and gingival recession. (Kalina 2022)
Recession = Thin gingiva + proclination +
Editing and Production – Farooq Ahmed