Arts

Books

Fashion & Beauty

Performing Arts

Food

Visual Arts

Design

Business

Entrepreneurship

Investing

Marketing

Careers

Management

Non-Profit

Comedy

Stand-Up

Comedy Interviews

Improv

Education

Self-Improvement

How To

Courses

Language Learning

Fiction

Comedy Fiction

Drama

Science Fiction

Government

Health & Fitness

Medicine

Alternative Health

Nutrition

Mental Health

Fitness

Sexuality

History

Kids & Family

Parenting

Stories for Kids

Education for Kids

Pets & Animals

Leisure

Video Games

Games

Automotive

Animation & Manga

Hobbies

Aviation

Home & Garden

Crafts

Music

Music Commentary

Music Interviews

Music History

News

Sports News

Entertainment News

News Commentary

Politics

Daily News

Business News

Tech News

Religion & Spirituality

Christianity

Spirituality

Religion

Judaism

Islam

Buddhism

Hinduism

Science

Social Sciences

Life Sciences

Natural Sciences

Nature

Chemistry

Mathematics

Earth Sciences

Physics

Astronomy

Society & Culture

Documentary

Relationships

Philosophy

Personal Journals

Places & Travel

Sports

Golf

Soccer

Wrestling

Basketball

Football

Fantasy Sports

Baseball

Wilderness

Running

Hockey

Rugby

Cricket

Volleyball

Tennis

Swimming

Technology

True Crime

TV & Film

Film Interviews

TV Reviews

After Shows

Film Reviews

Film History

<div>Podcast, kde se každý čtvrtek hraje hokej s Terkou Kubíčkovou, Vaškem Nedorostem a jejich hosty. Poslechněte si postřehy, příběhy i vtípky Patrika Štefana, Romana Málka a Zdeňka Blatného. Mistrů světa, jedničky NHL a skvělé moderátorky.</div>

Podcast, kde se každý čtvrtek hraje hokej s Terkou Kubíčkovou, Vaškem Nedorostem a jejich hosty. Poslechněte si postřehy, příběhy i vtípky Patrika Štefana, Romana Málka a Zdeňka Blatného. Mistrů světa, jedničky NHL a skvělé moderátorky.

Bago

Bývalý gólman, dneska trenér, Domino Rodinger, a.k.a. Bratinger, pyšníci se titulem s bratislavským Slovanem a Viktor Freisinger, bývalý hráč AC Sparta Praha, mládežnický reprezentant, dnes strůjce taktických rozborů Piera v Canal+ Sport a obrovský fanoušek Arsenalu. 
Sleduj @primozkabiny

Bývalý gólman, dneska trenér, Domino Rodinger, a.k.a. Bratinger, pyšníci se titulem s bratislavským Slovanem a Viktor Freisinger, bývalý hráč AC Sparta Praha, mládežnický reprezentant, dnes strůjce taktických rozborů Piera v Canal+ Sport a obrovský fanoušek Arsenalu. Sleduj @primozkabiny

PŘÍMO Z KABINY

Welcome to the Texas Two Seam Podcast, your new go-to source for all things Major League Baseball (MLB), with a special spotlight on the defending world champions, the Texas Rangers. Join us every week as we dive deep into the heart of baseball, providing you with expert analysis, insider information, and a recap of the most thrilling games and moments from the season.

Texas Two Seam

Disrespect Sports Network is a podcast based in East Texas that covers all things sports, except for high school games. Our mission is to bring you fresh, entertaining and thought-provoking content on the world of sports, while challenging conventional wisdom and turning the status quo on its head. Our team of experienced podcasters from the East Texas region are passionate about sports and are not afraid to share their opinions and insights on the latest news and trends in the world of sports. Join us for a wild ride through the world of sports as we discuss everything from football, basketball, baseball, and beyond. Get ready to be entertained and informed by the Disrespect Sports Network.

Disrespect Sports Network

Terry Bennett and Nohe Tedla get a cold drink and, once sufficiently lubricated, babble on about the latest happenings in the NFL.

Out Drank the Coverage

Brought to you by L4 Media Company, "Beyond the Sport" is a podcast for those who believe in the power of faith and fitness. Join host Tish Lee, a steadfast disciple of Christ and fitness enthusiast, as she unveils the inspiring connections between spiritual growth and athletic discipline.

Each episode delves into the lives of athletes and coaches who stand as living testaments to the strength that comes from balancing a rigorous training regimen with a committed faith journey. "Beyond the Sport" isn't just about the physical triumphs on the field; it's about the personal victories in life's daily challenges.

Whether you're seeking motivation, spiritual encouragement, or insights into the lives of those who compete with conviction, this podcast is your companion. Tune in to hear raw, heartfelt stories of perseverance, dedication, and the unwavering spirit that unites the worlds of sports and spirituality.

Brought to you by L4 Media Company, "Beyond the Sport" is a podcast for those who believe in the power of faith and fitness. Join host Tish Lee, a steadfast disciple of Christ and fitness enthusiast, as she unveils the inspiring connections between spiritual growth and athletic discipline. Each episode delves into the lives of athletes and coaches who stand as living testaments to the strength that comes from balancing a rigorous training regimen with a committed faith journey. "Beyond the Sport" isn't just about the physical triumphs on the field; it's about the personal victories in life's daily challenges. Whether you're seeking motivation, spiritual encouragement, or insights into the lives of those who compete with conviction, this podcast is your companion. Tune in to hear raw, heartfelt stories of perseverance, dedication, and the unwavering spirit that unites the worlds of sports and spirituality.

Beyond The Sport

Welcome to "The Outside Gate," where the spirit of adventure meets the thrill of motocross and supercross, all under the Aussie sun! Join your host, the one and only Aussie Steve, as he takes you on a wild journey through the adrenaline-pumping world of two-wheeled action, sprinkled with a dash of Australian life and the antics of his feathered friend, The Colonel.

The Outside Gate

S2S Sports Network is L4 Media's home for Texas high school sports coverage. From in-depth game analysis to interviews with coaches and athletes, S2S brings you the stories that matter most to North Texas sports fans.
Our lineup of shows covers Texas high school football, lifestyle, and more — delivered by a passionate team of hosts who live and breathe the game every single week.

S2S Sports Network is L4 Media's home for Texas high school sports coverage. From in-depth game analysis to interviews with coaches and athletes, S2S brings you the stories that matter most to North Texas sports fans. Our lineup of shows covers Texas high school football, lifestyle, and more — delivered by a passionate team of hosts who live and breathe the game every single week.

S2S Sports Network

NET Sports Network is a regional sports network dedicated to covering high school sports in North East Texas. Hosted by Bret Swinney, the network provides in-depth coverage of the top high school athletes and games in the region, including highlights, interviews, and analysis. With a focus on showcasing the hard work and dedication of North East Texas student-athletes, NET Sports Network is the go-to source for fans and families who want to stay up-to-date on all the action. Whether you're a fan of football, basketball, volleyball, or any other sport, you'll find the latest news, scores, and highlights on NET Sports Network.

NET Sports Network

«Еще зеленые» — это подкаст для молодых растениеводов, которые копаются в земле по любви. Озеленение домашнего пространства  уверенно занимает топовые позиции в рейтинге трендов. Фото зелёных соседей собирают комплименты кропотливым хозяевам. Растения улучшают не только атмосферу в доме, но и психологический климат.Какая почва станет благодатной для капризной орхидеи? Как создать идеальную температуру для огурцов в теплице?  И почему снова и снова приходится поливать герань? На эти и другие вопросы начинающих садоводов ответит Оксана Сердечная — блогер по призванию и агроном и флорист по образованию. Её знаниям и навыкам поддаются комнатные растения, садовые кустарники и огородные саженцы. Большой личный опыт Оксаны поможет тем, кто боится начать. А научный подход даст ответы на вопросы более опытных растениеводов. Этот подкаст сделан компанией «Сингента». «Сингента» занимает лидирующие позиции на рынке средств защиты растений и высококачественных семян. Компания помогает реализовать потенциал растений, сохраняя бережное отношение к ним.  Телеграм-канал подкаста: https://t.me/syngenta_podcast Сообщество ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/syngentamedia  Сайт Сингенты с полезной информацией для растениеводов: https://www.syngenta.ru/lawn-and-gardenТелеграм-канал Оксаны Сердечной: https://t.me/the_dacha_project

«Еще зеленые» — это подкаст для молодых растениеводов, которые копаются в земле по любви. Озеленение домашнего пространства уверенно занимает топовые позиции в рейтинге трендов. Фото зелёных соседей собирают комплименты кропотливым хозяевам. Растения улучшают не только атмосферу в доме, но и психологический климат. Какая почва станет благодатной для капризной орхидеи? Как создать идеальную температуру для огурцов в теплице? И почему снова и снова приходится поливать герань? На эти и другие вопросы начинающих садоводов ответит Оксана Сердечная — блогер по призванию и агроном и флорист по образованию. Её знаниям и навыкам поддаются комнатные растения, садовые кустарники и огородные саженцы. Большой личный опыт Оксаны поможет тем, кто боится начать. А научный подход даст ответы на вопросы более опытных растениеводов. Этот подкаст сделан компанией «Сингента». «Сингента» занимает лидирующие позиции на рынке средств защиты растений и высококачественных семян. Компания помогает реализовать потенциал растений, сохраняя бережное отношение к ним. Телеграм-канал подкаста: https://t.me/syngenta_podcastСообщество ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/syngentamedia Сайт Сингенты с полезной информацией для растениеводов: https://www.syngenta.ru/lawn-and-garden Телеграм-канал Оксаны Сердечной: https://t.me/the_dacha_project

«Еще зеленые» — это подкаст для молодых растениеводов, которые копаются в земле по любви.&nbsp;Озеленение домашнего пространства&nbsp; уверенно занимает топовые позиции в рейтинге трендов. Фото зелёных соседей собирают комплименты кропотливым хозяевам. Растения улучшают не только атмосферу в доме, но и психологический климат.Какая почва станет благодатной для капризной орхидеи? Как создать идеальную температуру для огурцов в теплице?&nbsp; И почему снова и снова приходится поливать герань? На эти и другие вопросы начинающих садоводов ответит Оксана Сердечная — блогер по призванию и агроном и флорист по образованию. Её знаниям и навыкам поддаются комнатные растения, садовые кустарники и огородные саженцы. Большой личный опыт Оксаны поможет тем, кто боится начать. А научный подход даст ответы на вопросы более опытных растениеводов.&nbsp;Этот подкаст сделан компанией «Сингента». «Сингента» занимает лидирующие позиции на рынке средств защиты растений и высококачественных семян. Компания помогает реализовать потенциал растений, сохраняя бережное отношение к ним.&nbsp; Телеграм-канал подкаста:&nbsp;https://t.me/syngenta_podcast Сообщество ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/syngentamedia&nbsp; Сайт Сингенты с полезной информацией для растениеводов: https://www.syngenta.ru/lawn-and-gardenТелеграм-канал Оксаны Сердечной:&nbsp;https://t.me/the_dacha_project

Еще зеленые

Mô tả
Mến chào các bạn! Chào mừng các bạn đã đến với kênh RADIO TÔI CHIA SẺ 

- "Không có gì lãng phí hơn là sống một cuộc sống bình thường. Không có gì bi đát hơn là một người đã mất đi sự lôi cuốn của mình" - Mark Ebbrra

- "... đừng để sự hư ảo cuộc đời biến mình thành giả tạo. Cứ sống theo ánh nhìn người khác, chỉ khiến bạn lạc lối trên con đường của chính mình ..." - (trích Thả Trôi Phiền Muộn)

- Mục đích kênh YouTube này được tạo ra là nhằm chia sẻ những danh ngôn, những bài viết hay về cách sống, lối ứng xử và các bài học kinh nghiệm. Từ đó, có thể giúp các bạn có tính thần lạc quan hơ

Mô tả Mến chào các bạn! Chào mừng các bạn đã đến với kênh RADIO TÔI CHIA SẺ - "Không có gì lãng phí hơn là sống một cuộc sống bình thường. Không có gì bi đát hơn là một người đã mất đi sự lôi cuốn của mình" - Mark Ebbrra - "... đừng để sự hư ảo cuộc đời biến mình thành giả tạo. Cứ sống theo ánh nhìn người khác, chỉ khiến bạn lạc lối trên con đường của chính mình ..." - (trích Thả Trôi Phiền Muộn) - Mục đích kênh YouTube này được tạo ra là nhằm chia sẻ những danh ngôn, những bài viết hay về cách sống, lối ứng xử và các bài học kinh nghiệm. Từ đó, có thể giúp các bạn có tính thần lạc quan hơ

Radio Tôi Chia Sẻ

🎙️ Psychology, Actually with Dr Marianne Trent is a podcast about what’s really going on beneath the surface of our lives.

Through conversations with psychologists, professionals, and inspiring guests, we explore the psychology shaping our work, our relationships, and our inner worlds bringing together clinical insight with genuine human understanding.

This show was previously known as The Aspiring Psychologist Podcast, and while it continues to support aspiring and qualified psychologists, it has grown into something broader. Because psychology doesn’t just shape our careers, it influences how we parent, how we grieve, how we connect, and how we cope when life doesn’t go to plan.

Alongside expert interviews, Dr Marianne Trent shares reflective solo episodes - making sense of complex human experiences with compassion, curiosity, and clarity.

Featuring conversations with leading voices in psychology including Professor Paul Gilbert, Dr Lucy Johnstone, and Dr Martha Deiros Collado - the podcast brings together a range of perspectives on what it means to live, work, and think psychologically.
New episodes are released every Monday at 6am (UK time).

Whether you’re an aspiring psychologist, a qualified practitioner, or simply someone interested in understanding yourself and others more deeply, this podcast offers thoughtful conversations that stay with you.

If you value the show please rate and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

🎙️ Psychology, Actually with Dr Marianne Trent is a podcast about what’s really going on beneath the surface of our lives. Through conversations with psychologists, professionals, and inspiring guests, we explore the psychology shaping our work, our relationships, and our inner worlds bringing together clinical insight with genuine human understanding. This show was previously known as The Aspiring Psychologist Podcast, and while it continues to support aspiring and qualified psychologists, it has grown into something broader. Because psychology doesn’t just shape our careers, it influences how we parent, how we grieve, how we connect, and how we cope when life doesn’t go to plan. Alongside expert interviews, Dr Marianne Trent shares reflective solo episodes - making sense of complex human experiences with compassion, curiosity, and clarity. Featuring conversations with leading voices in psychology including Professor Paul Gilbert, Dr Lucy Johnstone, and Dr Martha Deiros Collado - the podcast brings together a range of perspectives on what it means to live, work, and think psychologically. New episodes are released every Monday at 6am (UK time). Whether you’re an aspiring psychologist, a qualified practitioner, or simply someone interested in understanding yourself and others more deeply, this podcast offers thoughtful conversations that stay with you. If you value the show please rate and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Psychology, Actually

Radio Escape est l'occasion de parler d'escape game et d'immersion entre passionnés. Crée par Adrien Toma et Theo Gordy, cette émission reçoit à chaque épisode des créateurs, des joueurs, des game-masters ou encore des prestataires pour échanger sur leurs différentes expériences.<hr> Hébergé par Acast. Visitez <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> pour plus d'informations.

Radio Escape est l'occasion de parler d'escape game et d'immersion entre passionnés. Crée par Adrien Toma et Theo Gordy, cette émission reçoit à chaque épisode des créateurs, des joueurs, des game-masters ou encore des prestataires pour échanger sur leurs différentes expériences. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Radio Escape est l'occasion de parler d'escape game et d'immersion entre passionnés. Crée par Adrien Toma et Theo Gordy, cette émission reçoit à chaque épisode des créateurs, des joueurs, des game-masters ou encore des prestataires pour échanger sur leurs différentes expériences. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> pour plus d'informations.

Radio Escape

Walt Whitman has somewhere a fine and just distinction between “loving by allowance” and “loving with personal love.” This distinction applies to books as well as to men and women; and in the case of the not very numerous authors who are the objects of the personal affection, it brings a curious consequence with it. There is much more difference as to their best work than in the case of those others who are loved “by allowance” by convention, and because it is felt to be the right and proper thing to love them. And in the sect—fairly large and yet unusually choice—of Austenians or Janites, there would probably be found partisans of the claim to primacy of almost every one of the novels. To some the delightful freshness and humour of Northanger Abbey, its completeness, finish, and entrain, obscure the undoubted critical facts that its scale is small, and its scheme, after all, that of burlesque or parody, a kind in which the first rank is reached with difficulty. Persuasion, relatively faint in tone, and not enthralling in interest, has devotees who exalt above all the others its exquisite delicacy and keeping. The catastrophe of Mansfield Park is admittedly theatrical, the hero and heroine are insipid, and the author has almost{x} wickedly destroyed all romantic interest by expressly admitting that Edmund only took Fanny because Mary shocked him, and that Fanny might very likely have taken Crawford if he had been a little more assiduous; yet the matchless rehearsal-scenes and the characters of Mrs. Norris and others have secured, I believe, a considerable party for it. Sense and Sensibility has perhaps the fewest out-and-out admirers; but it does not want them.I suppose, however, that the majority of at least competent votes would, all things considered, be divided between Emma and the present book; and perhaps the vulgar verdict (if indeed a fondness for Miss Austen be not of itself a patent of exemption from any possible charge of vulgarity) would go for Emma. It is the larger, the more varied, the more popular; the author had by the time of its composition seen rather more of the world, and had improved her general, though not her most peculiar and characteristic dialogue; such figures as Miss Bates, as the Eltons, cannot but unite the suffrages of everybody. On the other hand, I, for my part, declare for Pride and Prejudice unhesitatingly. It seems to me the most perfect, the most characteristic, the most eminently quintessential of its author’s works; and for this contention in such narrow space as is permitted to me, I propose here to show cause.In the first place, the book (it may be barely necessary to remind the reader) was in its first shape written very early, somewhere about 1796, when Miss Austen was barely twenty-one; though it was revised and finished at Chawton some fifteen years later, and was not published till 1813, only four years before her death. I do not know whether, in{xi} this combination of the fresh and vigorous projection of youth, and the critical revision of middle life, there may be traced the distinct superiority in point of construction, which, as it seems to me, it possesses over all the others. The plot, though not elaborate, is almost regular enough for Fielding; hardly a character, hardly an incident could be retrenched without loss to the story. The elopement of Lydia and Wickham is not, like that of Crawford and Mrs. Rushworth, a coup de théâtre; it connects itself in the strictest way with the course of the story earlier, and brings about the denouement with complete propriety. All the minor passages—the loves of Jane and Bingley, the advent of Mr. Collins, the visit to Hunsford, the Derbyshire tour—fit in after the same unostentatious, but masterly fashion. There is no attempt at the hide-and-seek, in-and-out business, which in the transactions between Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax contributes no doubt a good deal to the intrigue of Emma, but contributes it in a fashion which I do not think the best feature of that otherwise admirable book. Although Miss Austen always liked something of the misunderstanding kind, which afforded her opportunities for the display of the peculiar and incomparable talent to be noticed presently, she has been satisfied here with the perfectly natural occasions provided by the false account of Darcy’s conduct given by Wickham, and by the awkwardness (arising with equal naturalness) from the gradual transformation of Elizabeth’s own feelings from positive aversion to actual love. I do not know whether the all-grasping hand of the playwright has ever been laid upon Pride and Prejudice; and I dare say that,{xii} if it were, the situations would prove not startling or garish enough for the footlights, the character-scheme too subtle and delicate for pit and gallery. But if the attempt were made, it would certainly not be hampered by any of those loosenesses of construction, which, sometimes disguised by the conveniences of which the novelist can avail himself, appear at once on the stage.I think, however, though the thought will doubtless seem heretical to more than one school of critics, that construction is not the highest merit, the choicest gift, of the novelist. It sets off his other gifts and graces most advantageously to the critical eye; and the want of it will sometimes mar those graces—appreciably, though not quite consciously—to eyes by no means ultra-critical. But a very badly-built novel which excelled in pathetic or humorous character, or which displayed consummate command of dialogue—perhaps the rarest of all faculties—would be an infinitely better thing than a faultless plot acted and told by puppets with pebbles in their mouths. And despite the ability which Miss Austen has shown in working out the story, I for one should put Pride and Prejudice far lower if it did not contain what seem to me the very masterpieces of Miss Austen’s humour and of her faculty of character-creation—masterpieces who may indeed admit John Thorpe, the Eltons, Mrs. Norris, and one or two others to their company, but who, in one instance certainly, and perhaps in others, are still superior to them.The characteristics of Miss Austen’s humour are so subtle and delicate that they are, perhaps, at all times easier to apprehend than to express, and at any particular{xiii} time likely to be differently apprehended by different persons. To me this humour seems to possess a greater affinity, on the whole, to that of Addison than to any other of the numerous species of this great British genus. The differences of scheme, of time, of subject, of literary convention, are, of course, obvious enough; the difference of sex does not, perhaps, count for much, for there was a distinctly feminine element in “Mr. Spectator,” and in Jane Austen’s genius there was, though nothing mannish, much that was masculine. But the likeness of quality consists in a great number of common subdivisions of quality—demureness, extreme minuteness of touch, avoidance of loud tones and glaring effects. Also there is in both a certain not inhuman or unamiable cruelty. It is the custom with those who judge grossly to contrast the good nature of Addison with the savagery of Swift, the mildness of Miss Austen with the boisterousness of Fielding and Smollett, even with the ferocious practical jokes that her immediate predecessor, Miss Burney, allowed without very much protest. Yet, both in Mr. Addison and in Miss Austen there is, though a restrained and well-mannered, an insatiable and ruthless delight in roasting and cutting up a fool. A man in the early eighteenth century, of course, could push this taste further than a lady in the early nineteenth; and no doubt Miss Austen’s principles, as well as her heart, would have shrunk from such things as the letter from the unfortunate husband in the Spectator, who describes, with all the gusto and all the innocence in the world, how his wife and his friend induce him to play at blind-man’s-buff. But another Spectator letter—that of the damsel of fourteen who{xiv} wishes to marry Mr. Shapely, and assures her selected Mentor that “he admires your Spectators mightily”—might have been written by a rather more ladylike and intelligent Lydia Bennet in the days of Lydia’s great-grandmother; while, on the other hand, some (I think unreasonably) have found “cynicism” in touches of Miss Austen’s own, such as her satire of Mrs. Musgrove’s self-deceiving regrets over her son. But this word “cynical” is one of the most misused in the English language, especially when, by a glaring and gratuitous falsification of its original sense, it is applied, not to rough and snarling invective, but to gentle and oblique satire. If cynicism means the perception of “the other side,” the sense of “the accepted hells beneath,” the consciousness that motives are nearly always mixed, and that to seem is not identical with to be—if this be cynicism, then every man and woman who is not a fool, who does not care to live in a fool’s paradise, who has knowledge of nature and the world and life, is a cynic. And in that sense Miss Austen certainly was one. She may even have been one in the further sense that, like her own Mr. Bennet, she took an epicurean delight in dissecting, in displaying, in setting at work her fools and her mean persons. I think she did take this delight, and I do not think at all the worse of her for it as a woman, while she was immensely the better for it as an artist.In respect of her art generally, Mr. Goldwin Smith has truly observed that “metaphor has been exhausted in depicting the perfection of it, combined with the narrowness of her field;” and he has justly added that we need not go beyond her own comparison to the art of a miniature{xv} painter. To make this latter obser

Walt Whitman has somewhere a fine and just distinction between “loving by allowance” and “loving with personal love.” This distinction applies to books as well as to men and women; and in the case of the not very numerous authors who are the objects of the personal affection, it brings a curious consequence with it. There is much more difference as to their best work than in the case of those others who are loved “by allowance” by convention, and because it is felt to be the right and proper thing to love them. And in the sect—fairly large and yet unusually choice—of Austenians or Janites, there would probably be found partisans of the claim to primacy of almost every one of the novels. To some the delightful freshness and humour of Northanger Abbey, its completeness, finish, and entrain, obscure the undoubted critical facts that its scale is small, and its scheme, after all, that of burlesque or parody, a kind in which the first rank is reached with difficulty. Persuasion, relatively faint in tone, and not enthralling in interest, has devotees who exalt above all the others its exquisite delicacy and keeping. The catastrophe of Mansfield Park is admittedly theatrical, the hero and heroine are insipid, and the author has almost{x} wickedly destroyed all romantic interest by expressly admitting that Edmund only took Fanny because Mary shocked him, and that Fanny might very likely have taken Crawford if he had been a little more assiduous; yet the matchless rehearsal-scenes and the characters of Mrs. Norris and others have secured, I believe, a considerable party for it. Sense and Sensibility has perhaps the fewest out-and-out admirers; but it does not want them.I suppose, however, that the majority of at least competent votes would, all things considered, be divided between Emma and the present book; and perhaps the vulgar verdict (if indeed a fondness for Miss Austen be not of itself a patent of exemption from any possible charge of vulgarity) would go for Emma. It is the larger, the more varied, the more popular; the author had by the time of its composition seen rather more of the world, and had improved her general, though not her most peculiar and characteristic dialogue; such figures as Miss Bates, as the Eltons, cannot but unite the suffrages of everybody. On the other hand, I, for my part, declare for Pride and Prejudice unhesitatingly. It seems to me the most perfect, the most characteristic, the most eminently quintessential of its author’s works; and for this contention in such narrow space as is permitted to me, I propose here to show cause.In the first place, the book (it may be barely necessary to remind the reader) was in its first shape written very early, somewhere about 1796, when Miss Austen was barely twenty-one; though it was revised and finished at Chawton some fifteen years later, and was not published till 1813, only four years before her death. I do not know whether, in{xi} this combination of the fresh and vigorous projection of youth, and the critical revision of middle life, there may be traced the distinct superiority in point of construction, which, as it seems to me, it possesses over all the others. The plot, though not elaborate, is almost regular enough for Fielding; hardly a character, hardly an incident could be retrenched without loss to the story. The elopement of Lydia and Wickham is not, like that of Crawford and Mrs. Rushworth, a coup de théâtre; it connects itself in the strictest way with the course of the story earlier, and brings about the denouement with complete propriety. All the minor passages—the loves of Jane and Bingley, the advent of Mr. Collins, the visit to Hunsford, the Derbyshire tour—fit in after the same unostentatious, but masterly fashion. There is no attempt at the hide-and-seek, in-and-out business, which in the transactions between Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax contributes no doubt a good deal to the intrigue of Emma, but contributes it in a fashion which I do not think the best feature of that otherwise admirable book. Although Miss Austen always liked something of the misunderstanding kind, which afforded her opportunities for the display of the peculiar and incomparable talent to be noticed presently, she has been satisfied here with the perfectly natural occasions provided by the false account of Darcy’s conduct given by Wickham, and by the awkwardness (arising with equal naturalness) from the gradual transformation of Elizabeth’s own feelings from positive aversion to actual love. I do not know whether the all-grasping hand of the playwright has ever been laid upon Pride and Prejudice; and I dare say that,{xii} if it were, the situations would prove not startling or garish enough for the footlights, the character-scheme too subtle and delicate for pit and gallery. But if the attempt were made, it would certainly not be hampered by any of those loosenesses of construction, which, sometimes disguised by the conveniences of which the novelist can avail himself, appear at once on the stage.I think, however, though the thought will doubtless seem heretical to more than one school of critics, that construction is not the highest merit, the choicest gift, of the novelist. It sets off his other gifts and graces most advantageously to the critical eye; and the want of it will sometimes mar those graces—appreciably, though not quite consciously—to eyes by no means ultra-critical. But a very badly-built novel which excelled in pathetic or humorous character, or which displayed consummate command of dialogue—perhaps the rarest of all faculties—would be an infinitely better thing than a faultless plot acted and told by puppets with pebbles in their mouths. And despite the ability which Miss Austen has shown in working out the story, I for one should put Pride and Prejudice far lower if it did not contain what seem to me the very masterpieces of Miss Austen’s humour and of her faculty of character-creation—masterpieces who may indeed admit John Thorpe, the Eltons, Mrs. Norris, and one or two others to their company, but who, in one instance certainly, and perhaps in others, are still superior to them.The characteristics of Miss Austen’s humour are so subtle and delicate that they are, perhaps, at all times easier to apprehend than to express, and at any particular{xiii} time likely to be differently apprehended by different persons. To me this humour seems to possess a greater affinity, on the whole, to that of Addison than to any other of the numerous species of this great British genus. The differences of scheme, of time, of subject, of literary convention, are, of course, obvious enough; the difference of sex does not, perhaps, count for much, for there was a distinctly feminine element in “Mr. Spectator,” and in Jane Austen’s genius there was, though nothing mannish, much that was masculine. But the likeness of quality consists in a great number of common subdivisions of quality—demureness, extreme minuteness of touch, avoidance of loud tones and glaring effects. Also there is in both a certain not inhuman or unamiable cruelty. It is the custom with those who judge grossly to contrast the good nature of Addison with the savagery of Swift, the mildness of Miss Austen with the boisterousness of Fielding and Smollett, even with the ferocious practical jokes that her immediate predecessor, Miss Burney, allowed without very much protest. Yet, both in Mr. Addison and in Miss Austen there is, though a restrained and well-mannered, an insatiable and ruthless delight in roasting and cutting up a fool. A man in the early eighteenth century, of course, could push this taste further than a lady in the early nineteenth; and no doubt Miss Austen’s principles, as well as her heart, would have shrunk from such things as the letter from the unfortunate husband in the Spectator, who describes, with all the gusto and all the innocence in the world, how his wife and his friend induce him to play at blind-man’s-buff. But another Spectator letter—that of the damsel of fourteen who{xiv} wishes to marry Mr. Shapely, and assures her selected Mentor that “he admires your Spectators mightily”—might have been written by a rather more ladylike and intelligent Lydia Bennet in the days of Lydia’s great-grandmother; while, on the other hand, some (I think unreasonably) have found “cynicism” in touches of Miss Austen’s own, such as her satire of Mrs. Musgrove’s self-deceiving regrets over her son. But this word “cynical” is one of the most misused in the English language, especially when, by a glaring and gratuitous falsification of its original sense, it is applied, not to rough and snarling invective, but to gentle and oblique satire. If cynicism means the perception of “the other side,” the sense of “the accepted hells beneath,” the consciousness that motives are nearly always mixed, and that to seem is not identical with to be—if this be cynicism, then every man and woman who is not a fool, who does not care to live in a fool’s paradise, who has knowledge of nature and the world and life, is a cynic. And in that sense Miss Austen certainly was one. She may even have been one in the further sense that, like her own Mr. Bennet, she took an epicurean delight in dissecting, in displaying, in setting at work her fools and her mean persons. I think she did take this delight, and I do not think at all the worse of her for it as a woman, while she was immensely the better for it as an artist.In respect of her art generally, Mr. Goldwin Smith has truly observed that “metaphor has been exhausted in depicting the perfection of it, combined with the narrowness of her field;” and he has justly added that we need not go beyond her own comparison to the art of a miniature{xv} painter. To make this latter obser

Walt Whitman&nbsp;has somewhere a fine and just distinction between “loving by allowance” and “loving with personal love.” This distinction applies to books as well as to men and women; and in the case of the not very numerous authors who are the objects of the personal affection, it brings a curious consequence with it. There is much more difference as to their best work than in the case of those others who are loved “by allowance” by convention, and because it is felt to be the right and proper thing to love them. And in the sect—fairly large and yet unusually choice—of Austenians or Janites, there would probably be found partisans of the claim to primacy of almost every one of the novels. To some the delightful freshness and humour of&nbsp;Northanger Abbey,&nbsp;its completeness, finish, and&nbsp;entrain,&nbsp;obscure the undoubted critical facts that its scale is small, and its scheme, after all, that of burlesque or parody, a kind in which the first rank is reached with difficulty.&nbsp;Persuasion,&nbsp;relatively faint in tone, and not enthralling in interest, has devotees who exalt above all the others its exquisite delicacy and keeping. The catastrophe of&nbsp;Mansfield Park&nbsp;is admittedly theatrical, the hero and heroine are insipid, and the author has almost{x}&nbsp;wickedly destroyed all romantic interest by expressly admitting that Edmund only took Fanny because Mary shocked him, and that Fanny might very likely have taken Crawford if he had been a little more assiduous; yet the matchless rehearsal-scenes and the characters of Mrs. Norris and others have secured, I believe, a considerable party for it.&nbsp;Sense and Sensibility&nbsp;has perhaps the fewest out-and-out admirers; but it does not want them.I suppose, however, that the majority of at least competent votes would, all things considered, be divided between&nbsp;Emma&nbsp;and the present book; and perhaps the vulgar verdict (if indeed a fondness for Miss Austen be not of itself a patent of exemption from any possible charge of vulgarity) would go for&nbsp;Emma.&nbsp;It is the larger, the more varied, the more popular; the author had by the time of its composition seen rather more of the world, and had improved her general, though not her most peculiar and characteristic dialogue; such figures as Miss Bates, as the Eltons, cannot but unite the suffrages of everybody. On the other hand, I, for my part, declare for&nbsp;Pride and Prejudice&nbsp;unhesitatingly. It seems to me the most perfect, the most characteristic, the most eminently quintessential of its author’s works; and for this contention in such narrow space as is permitted to me, I propose here to show cause.In the first place, the book (it may be barely necessary to remind the reader) was in its first shape written very early, somewhere about 1796, when Miss Austen was barely twenty-one; though it was revised and finished at Chawton some fifteen years later, and was not published till 1813, only four years before her death. I do not know whether, in{xi}&nbsp;this combination of the fresh and vigorous projection of youth, and the critical revision of middle life, there may be traced the distinct superiority in point of construction, which, as it seems to me, it possesses over all the others. The plot, though not elaborate, is almost regular enough for Fielding; hardly a character, hardly an incident could be retrenched without loss to the story. The elopement of Lydia and Wickham is not, like that of Crawford and Mrs. Rushworth, a&nbsp;coup de théâtre;&nbsp;it connects itself in the strictest way with the course of the story earlier, and brings about the denouement with complete propriety. All the minor passages—the loves of Jane and Bingley, the advent of Mr. Collins, the visit to Hunsford, the Derbyshire tour—fit in after the same unostentatious, but masterly fashion. There is no attempt at the hide-and-seek, in-and-out business, which in the transactions between Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax contributes no doubt a good deal to the intrigue of&nbsp;Emma,&nbsp;but contributes it in a fashion which I do not think the best feature of that otherwise admirable book. Although Miss Austen always liked something of the misunderstanding kind, which afforded her opportunities for the display of the peculiar and incomparable talent to be noticed presently, she has been satisfied here with the perfectly natural occasions provided by the false account of Darcy’s conduct given by Wickham, and by the awkwardness (arising with equal naturalness) from the gradual transformation of Elizabeth’s own feelings from positive aversion to actual love. I do not know whether the all-grasping hand of the playwright has ever been laid upon&nbsp;Pride and Prejudice;&nbsp;and I dare say that,{xii}&nbsp;if it were, the situations would prove not startling or garish enough for the footlights, the character-scheme too subtle and delicate for pit and gallery. But if the attempt were made, it would certainly not be hampered by any of those loosenesses of construction, which, sometimes disguised by the conveniences of which the novelist can avail himself, appear at once on the stage.I think, however, though the thought will doubtless seem heretical to more than one school of critics, that construction is not the highest merit, the choicest gift, of the novelist. It sets off his other gifts and graces most advantageously to the critical eye; and the want of it will sometimes mar those graces—appreciably, though not quite consciously—to eyes by no means ultra-critical. But a very badly-built novel which excelled in pathetic or humorous character, or which displayed consummate command of dialogue—perhaps the rarest of all faculties—would be an infinitely better thing than a faultless plot acted and told by puppets with pebbles in their mouths. And despite the ability which Miss Austen has shown in working out the story, I for one should put&nbsp;Pride and Prejudice&nbsp;far lower if it did not contain what seem to me the very masterpieces of Miss Austen’s humour and of her faculty of character-creation—masterpieces who may indeed admit John Thorpe, the Eltons, Mrs. Norris, and one or two others to their company, but who, in one instance certainly, and perhaps in others, are still superior to them.The characteristics of Miss Austen’s humour are so subtle and delicate that they are, perhaps, at all times easier to apprehend than to express, and at any particular{xiii}&nbsp;time likely to be differently apprehended by different persons. To me this humour seems to possess a greater affinity, on the whole, to that of Addison than to any other of the numerous species of this great British genus. The differences of scheme, of time, of subject, of literary convention, are, of course, obvious enough; the difference of sex does not, perhaps, count for much, for there was a distinctly feminine element in “Mr. Spectator,” and in Jane Austen’s genius there was, though nothing mannish, much that was masculine. But the likeness of quality consists in a great number of common subdivisions of quality—demureness, extreme minuteness of touch, avoidance of loud tones and glaring effects. Also there is in both a certain not inhuman or unamiable cruelty. It is the custom with those who judge grossly to contrast the good nature of Addison with the savagery of Swift, the mildness of Miss Austen with the boisterousness of Fielding and Smollett, even with the ferocious practical jokes that her immediate predecessor, Miss Burney, allowed without very much protest. Yet, both in Mr. Addison and in Miss Austen there is, though a restrained and well-mannered, an insatiable and ruthless delight in roasting and cutting up a fool. A man in the early eighteenth century, of course, could push this taste further than a lady in the early nineteenth; and no doubt Miss Austen’s principles, as well as her heart, would have shrunk from such things as the letter from the unfortunate husband in the&nbsp;Spectator,&nbsp;who describes, with all the gusto and all the innocence in the world, how his wife and his friend induce him to play at blind-man’s-buff. But another&nbsp;Spectator&nbsp;letter—that of the damsel of fourteen who{xiv}&nbsp;wishes to marry Mr. Shapely, and assures her selected Mentor that “he admires your&nbsp;Spectators&nbsp;mightily”—might have been written by a rather more ladylike and intelligent Lydia Bennet in the days of Lydia’s great-grandmother; while, on the other hand, some (I think unreasonably) have found “cynicism” in touches of Miss Austen’s own, such as her satire of Mrs. Musgrove’s self-deceiving regrets over her son. But this word “cynical” is one of the most misused in the English language, especially when, by a glaring and gratuitous falsification of its original sense, it is applied, not to rough and snarling invective, but to gentle and oblique satire. If cynicism means the perception of “the other side,” the sense of “the accepted hells beneath,” the consciousness that motives are nearly always mixed, and that to seem is not identical with to be—if this be cynicism, then every man and woman who is not a fool, who does not care to live in a fool’s paradise, who has knowledge of nature and the world and life, is a cynic. And in that sense Miss Austen certainly was one. She may even have been one in the further sense that, like her own Mr. Bennet, she took an epicurean delight in dissecting, in displaying, in setting at work her fools and her mean persons. I think she did take this delight, and I do not think at all the worse of her for it as a woman, while she was immensely the better for it as an artist.In respect of her art generally, Mr. Goldwin Smith has truly observed that “metaphor has been exhausted in depicting the perfection of it, combined with the narrowness of her field;” and he has justly added that we need not go beyond her own comparison to the art of a miniature{xv}&nbsp;painter. To make this latter obser

Pride and Prejudice

De leukste wijze van mediteren voor iedere vrouw die haar Vrouwenlijf & Brein blij en gezond wil maken. Deze unieke podcast inspireert vrouwen, met kennis en speelse meditaties, om beter te luisteren naar hun vrouwenlijf, zodat ze haar beter kunnen beschermen en in balans brengen. N.B. Alle waardevolle meditaties zijn gratis, het enige wat wij vragen is een kleine donatie voor een erkend goed doel voor het vrouwenlijf, nl de ontwikkeling van een Early Warning Scan bij borstkanker op <a href="https://www.yvya.nl/help-mee/doneer" target="_blank" style="font-family: sans-serif;">https://www.yvya.nl/help-mee/doneer</a>  Een veilige fijne Scan voor de borsten van vrouwen vanaf 16 jaar. Dat wil jij toch ook!  Gecreëerd door Drs. Coleta van Bekhoven  <a></a><a href="www.altijblijvenspelen.nl">www.</a><a href="www.altijblijvenspelen.nl">altijblijvenspelen.nl</a><a> </a>samen met de muziek van Eline van Esch op <a href="www.spiritflute.nl" target="_blank" style="background-color: rgb(255 255 255/var(--tw-bg-opacity)); font-family: sans-serif;">www.spiritflute.nl</a>

De leukste wijze van mediteren voor iedere vrouw die haar Vrouwenlijf & Brein blij en gezond wil maken. Deze unieke podcast inspireert vrouwen, met kennis en speelse meditaties, om beter te luisteren naar hun vrouwenlijf, zodat ze haar beter kunnen beschermen en in balans brengen. N.B. Alle waardevolle meditaties zijn gratis, het enige wat wij vragen is een kleine donatie voor een erkend goed doel voor het vrouwenlijf, nl de ontwikkeling van een Early Warning Scan bij borstkanker op https://www.yvya.nl/help-mee/doneer Een veilige fijne Scan voor de borsten van vrouwen vanaf 16 jaar. Dat wil jij toch ook! Gecreëerd door Drs. Coleta van Bekhoven www.altijblijvenspelen.nl samen met de muziek van Eline van Esch op www.spiritflute.nl

De leukste wijze van mediteren voor iedere vrouw die haar Vrouwenlijf &amp; Brein blij en gezond wil maken.&nbsp;Deze unieke podcast inspireert&nbsp;vrouwen, met kennis&nbsp;en speelse meditaties, om beter te luisteren naar hun&nbsp;vrouwenlijf, zodat ze haar&nbsp;beter kunnen beschermen en in balans brengen. N.B. Alle waardevolle meditaties&nbsp;zijn gratis, het enige wat wij vragen is een kleine donatie voor een erkend goed doel voor het vrouwenlijf, nl de ontwikkeling van een Early Warning Scan bij borstkanker&nbsp;op <a href="https://www.yvya.nl/help-mee/doneer" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.yvya.nl/help-mee/doneer</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Een veilige fijne Scan voor de borsten van vrouwen vanaf 16 jaar. Dat wil jij toch ook!&nbsp;&nbsp;Gecreëerd door Drs. Coleta van Bekhoven &nbsp;<a rel="noopener noreferrer"></a><a href="www.altijblijvenspelen.nl" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.</a><a href="www.altijblijvenspelen.nl" rel="noopener noreferrer">altijblijvenspelen.nl</a><a rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>samen met de muziek van Eline van Esch op&nbsp;<a href="www.spiritflute.nl" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.spiritflute.nl</a>

Vrouwenlijf Meditatie

Um podcast sobre pessoas que sabem sorver a vida de forma especial.

Mundo a Copo

Lärare och forskning är en podd om lärares undervisningsutveckling.
Vi lyfter fram forskning som görs av och med lärare, för lärare, och som fördjupar olika aspekter av undervisningen och elevernas lärande. 
Podden görs av Lärarstiftelsen i samarbete med Sveriges Lärare.

Lärare och forskning är en podd om lärares undervisningsutveckling. Vi lyfter fram forskning som görs av och med lärare, för lärare, och som fördjupar olika aspekter av undervisningen och elevernas lärande. Podden görs av Lärarstiftelsen i samarbete med Sveriges Lärare.

Lärare & Forskning

https://youtube.com/channel/UC2_p5Ajcn5xG1Zkga8jGO6Q

 Hosted by Sam and Matt. 
- We preview races from melbourne metro meeting
- Trial Tracker
- Bets around the grounds
- 4 leg multi
- Pineapple of the week - (best bet)

https://youtube.com/channel/UC2_p5Ajcn5xG1Zkga8jGO6Q Hosted by Sam and Matt. - We preview races from melbourne metro meeting - Trial Tracker - Bets around the grounds - 4 leg multi - Pineapple of the week - (best bet)

Whispers Racing Podcast

Welcome to Mind Bogglers: True Crime — the podcast that dives straight into some of the most perplexing and unsettling criminal cases.I'm Izzy, your host. You can find me on Instagram at @izzermcglizzer.Each episode, I’m joined by a rotating co-host as we break down the stories, theories, and psychological twists behind crimes that leave more questions than answers.At Mind Bogglers, we cut through the noise and get straight to the heart of the case. No theatrics, no sugarcoating — just the facts, the motives, and the strange human decisions that lead to unthinkable acts.Whether you're a seasoned true crime obsessive or just dipping your toes into the genre, Mind Bogglers is where we unpack the mysteries that refuse to stay buried.Tune in, stay curious, and let’s unravel the case.<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Welcome to Mind Bogglers: True Crime — the podcast that dives straight into some of the most perplexing and unsettling criminal cases. I'm Izzy, your host. You can find me on Instagram at @izzermcglizzer. Each episode, I’m joined by a rotating co-host as we break down the stories, theories, and psychological twists behind crimes that leave more questions than answers. At Mind Bogglers, we cut through the noise and get straight to the heart of the case. No theatrics, no sugarcoating — just the facts, the motives, and the strange human decisions that lead to unthinkable acts. Whether you're a seasoned true crime obsessive or just dipping your toes into the genre, Mind Bogglers is where we unpack the mysteries that refuse to stay buried. Tune in, stay curious, and let’s unravel the case. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Welcome to Mind Bogglers: True Crime — the podcast that dives straight into some of the most perplexing and unsettling criminal cases.I'm Izzy, your host. You can find me on Instagram at @izzermcglizzer.Each episode, I’m joined by a rotating co-host as we break down the stories, theories, and psychological twists behind crimes that leave more questions than answers.At Mind Bogglers, we cut through the noise and get straight to the heart of the case. No theatrics, no sugarcoating — just the facts, the motives, and the strange human decisions that lead to unthinkable acts.Whether you're a seasoned true crime obsessive or just dipping your toes into the genre, Mind Bogglers is where we unpack the mysteries that refuse to stay buried.Tune in, stay curious, and let’s unravel the case. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Mind Bogglers: True Crime

Vítejte ve Finex.cz Podcastech, důvěryhodném zdroji odborných informací o financích, investování, kryptoměnách a osobních financích. 

Připojte se k nám a odhalte cenné informace, rozšifrujte tržní trendy a poslouchejte inspirativní příběhy, které vám pomohou na vaší finanční cestě.

Vítejte ve Finex.cz Podcastech, důvěryhodném zdroji odborných informací o financích, investování, kryptoměnách a osobních financích. Připojte se k nám a odhalte cenné informace, rozšifrujte tržní trendy a poslouchejte inspirativní příběhy, které vám pomohou na vaší finanční cestě.

Investice a obchodování | FINEX.CZ

中欧国际文学节，促进欧洲与中国作家的思想与文化交流。

中欧国际文学节

Tu cherches à sortir de ta zone de confort, prendre du temps pour toi et agir sur ta vie ? Tu veux redécouvrir des notions de ton quotidien et te cultiver ? Bienvenue sur Peace &amp; Laë, ton rendez-vous self love de la semaine, conçu spécialement pour les femmes en quête de bien-être. 💌


Chaque semaine, je t'invite à explorer des moyens concrets pour cultiver la quiétude de ton cœur et de ton esprit, tout en tombant amoureuse de toi-même. Ensemble, nous allons redécouvrir des notions essentielles de ton quotidien et t'inspirer à travers des sujets qui te permettront d'avoir des conversations profondes et enrichissantes avec toi-même ou ton entourage.


Prête à démarrer ce voyage ? Abonne-toi dès maintenant pour ne manquer aucun épisode et rejoins notre communauté dédiée à l'épanouissement personnel des femmes et de la société. 🤍


De moi, pour vous


- Laë
📥 instagram : peaceandlae
📩  peaceandlae@gmail.com
Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Tu cherches à sortir de ta zone de confort, prendre du temps pour toi et agir sur ta vie ? Tu veux redécouvrir des notions de ton quotidien et te cultiver ? Bienvenue sur Peace & Laë, ton rendez-vous self love de la semaine, conçu spécialement pour les femmes en quête de bien-être. 💌 Chaque semaine, je t'invite à explorer des moyens concrets pour cultiver la quiétude de ton cœur et de ton esprit, tout en tombant amoureuse de toi-même. Ensemble, nous allons redécouvrir des notions essentielles de ton quotidien et t'inspirer à travers des sujets qui te permettront d'avoir des conversations profondes et enrichissantes avec toi-même ou ton entourage. Prête à démarrer ce voyage ? Abonne-toi dès maintenant pour ne manquer aucun épisode et rejoins notre communauté dédiée à l'épanouissement personnel des femmes et de la société. 🤍 De moi, pour vous - Laë 📥 instagram : peaceandlae 📩 peaceandlae@gmail.com Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Tu cherches à sortir de ta zone de confort, prendre du temps pour toi et agir sur ta vie ? Tu veux redécouvrir des notions de ton quotidien et te cultiver ? Bienvenue sur Peace &amp; Laë, ton rendez-vous self love de la semaine, conçu spécialement pour les femmes en quête de bien-être. 💌


Chaque semaine, je t'invite à explorer des moyens concrets pour cultiver la quiétude de ton cœur et de ton esprit, tout en tombant amoureuse de toi-même. Ensemble, nous allons redécouvrir des notions essentielles de ton quotidien et t'inspirer à travers des sujets qui te permettront d'avoir des conversations profondes et enrichissantes avec toi-même ou ton entourage.


Prête à démarrer ce voyage ? Abonne-toi dès maintenant pour ne manquer aucun épisode et rejoins notre communauté dédiée à l'épanouissement personnel des femmes et de la société. 🤍


De moi, pour vous


- Laë
📥 instagram : peaceandlae
📩 &nbsp;peaceandlae@gmail.com
Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Peace & Laë

Hypersensible, au gré d'un parcours atypique, je te livre mes pensées les plus sincères.
Je t’invite à plonger avec moi dans cet océan de réflexions, où l’amour, la douceur et la bienveillance se cultivent.
Que ce podcast nous mène vers notre quête essentielle, où l’unique but est l’amour du Très-Haut. 
Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Hypersensible, au gré d'un parcours atypique, je te livre mes pensées les plus sincères. Je t’invite à plonger avec moi dans cet océan de réflexions, où l’amour, la douceur et la bienveillance se cultivent. Que ce podcast nous mène vers notre quête essentielle, où l’unique but est l’amour du Très-Haut. Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Reflet de l’âme 1

Казвам се Емилия Ангелова и се занимавам с клинична психология и хипнотерапия. Създадох Подкаста “Ела на себе си”, за да си помагаме във връзките. Не зная за другите подкастове, но този обещава да бъде невъзмутимо искрен. Побира всички видове връзки - от връзката, която изграждаме със себе си, преминава към връзката ни с другите, стига до връзката ни с природата, а от там потегля към цялата Вселена. 

Идваме на себе си. 
Всеки четвъртък, 22:22ч.

Казвам се Емилия Ангелова и се занимавам с клинична психология и хипнотерапия. Създадох Подкаста “Ела на себе си”, за да си помагаме във връзките. Не зная за другите подкастове, но този обещава да бъде невъзмутимо искрен. Побира всички видове връзки - от връзката, която изграждаме със себе си, преминава към връзката ни с другите, стига до връзката ни с природата, а от там потегля към цялата Вселена. Идваме на себе си. Всеки четвъртък, 22:22ч.

EmiliaTherapy

Bite sized episodes - each one a piece of the puzzle that helps to explain the therapy world!

Bite sized episodes - each one a piece of the puzzle that helps to explain the therapy world!

Therabytes

Filosofiska Podden görs i Lund av Lars Mogensen, radiojournalist och Melina Tsapos, doktorand i teoretisk filosofi vid Lunds universitet. Vi samtalar med&nbsp; filosofer, forskare och andra som är öppna för att med lekfullhet och allvar diskutera livets och vår tids frågor. Lars är känd som tidigare programledare i Sveriges Radios Filosofiska rummet. Melina doktorerar på frågor om konspirationsteorier.Vi vill höra dina idéer och frågor. Mejla med ett snabela: kontakt at filosofiskapodden.se

Filosofiska Podden görs i Lund av Lars Mogensen, radiojournalist och Melina Tsapos, doktorand i teoretisk filosofi vid Lunds universitet. Vi samtalar med  filosofer, forskare och andra som är öppna för att med lekfullhet och allvar diskutera livets och vår tids frågor. Lars är känd som tidigare programledare i Sveriges Radios Filosofiska rummet. Melina doktorerar på frågor om konspirationsteorier.Vi vill höra dina idéer och frågor. Mejla med ett snabela: kontakt at filosofiskapodden.se

Filosofiska Podden med Mogensen & Tsapos

Bewegende Gespräche für bewegte Zeiten – das Talkformat im Ö1 Feuilleton "Diagonal“.

Diagonal gefragt

Im November 2024 entscheidet sich bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen die Zukunft der US-Demokratie. Aber was ist eigentlich los MIT den USA, was ist los IN den USA?
Wir begleiten das Land und seine Politik, leuchten in seine Träume und Ängste hinein - in der neuen Podcast-Reihe der Kleine Zeitung.

Im November 2024 entscheidet sich bei den Präsidentschaftswahlen die Zukunft der US-Demokratie. Aber was ist eigentlich los MIT den USA, was ist los IN den USA? Wir begleiten das Land und seine Politik, leuchten in seine Träume und Ängste hinein - in der neuen Podcast-Reihe der Kleine Zeitung.

WTF, America?

Grab a drink! Get your comic! On every episode of "Superpower Happy Hour", host Ryan Does is joined by some friends for a few adult beverages and they dig into an issue. Let's have a good time!

Superpower Happy Hour: Fantastic Four

Ryan Does and Ross Lawhead spotlight some of Marvel Comic's iconic characters who may go under the radar! From their comic book origins to their TV and film we give you an essential warm up for these underrated heroes!

MARVEL SPOTLIGHT: WARLOCK

Have you ever wondered, "What your favorite creator’s favorite comic is?" On every episode of WHAT'S YOUR ISSUE? host Ryan Does talks with a comic book creator about their favorite issue and how that has impacted their own work and life.

What's Your Issue?

駅のホームでの雑談に夢中で電車を乗り過ごす人達（通称"Platformers"）の二人が送るPodcast『Platform』。
日曜更新。石橋（ishibashi）と鳴海（narumi）でお送りしています。
出演：石橋 鳴海
#platformers #podcast #podcaster #japanesepodcast
#石橋鳴海 #日曜更新 #アラフォーラジオ
https://www.instagram.com/platformers_ii/
https://mastodon-japan.net/home
https://listen.style/p/platformers?JDpBfUXX

駅のホームでの雑談に夢中で電車を乗り過ごす人達（通称"Platformers"）の二人が送るPodcast『Platform』。 日曜更新。石橋（ishibashi）と鳴海（narumi）でお送りしています。 出演：石橋 鳴海 #platformers #podcast #podcaster #japanesepodcast #石橋鳴海 #日曜更新 #アラフォーラジオ https://www.instagram.com/platformers_ii/ https://mastodon-japan.net/home https://listen.style/p/platformers?JDpBfUXX

Top Podcasts / Page 28280

Bago

PŘÍMO Z KABINY

Texas Two Seam

Disrespect Sports Network

Out Drank the Coverage

Beyond The Sport

The Outside Gate

S2S Sports Network

NET Sports Network

Еще зеленые

Radio Tôi Chia Sẻ

Psychology, Actually

Radio Escape

Pride and Prejudice

Vrouwenlijf Meditatie

Mundo a Copo

Lärare & Forskning

Whispers Racing Podcast

Mind Bogglers: True Crime

Investice a obchodování | FINEX.CZ

中欧国际文学节

Peace & Laë

Reflet de l’âme 1

EmiliaTherapy

Therabytes

Filosofiska Podden med Mogensen & Tsapos

Diagonal gefragt

WTF, America?

Superpower Happy Hour: Fantastic Four

MARVEL SPOTLIGHT: WARLOCK

What's Your Issue?

Platform

VOREST AG Podcast

หลวงตาศิริ อินทสิริ

世界百大禁片

The Wellness Exchange

Understanding Self

AzubiWissen - Talk und Tipps für die kaufmännische Ausbildung

Rangers Talk

Voice of God Sleep Meditation

What the F... Fertility?! with Pips, Alex & Maddy

Patmore's Potcast: Ein Bridgerton und Downton Abbey Podcast

49ers Mil Cast

R2 Päev intervjuud

解药小姐 Dr. Hoe Hoe

おねむねむラジオ

9Natree

神田大介の経験

I tu się nie zgodzę

Der Google Ads 1x1 Podcast - Insights & Tipps vom SEA Experten Daniel Rakus