This is part two of the Fitting Roundtable discussion with Andy Pruitt, Todd Carver and myself. 

This episode is a “Cross Pod” with Fast Talk Labs. We recorded in the FTL studio in Boulder, with Chris and Trevor there to moderate. This episode expands our discussion and we get into the technology we use in our fits, as well as a discussion about normative or orthodox data.

Thank you @fasttalklabs for allowing me to publish this on my channel too. I am sure my audience will find it a worthwhile discussion on the topic of fitting.

Fasttalk Labs on the Web: https://www.fasttalklabs.com

Do you want to hear me discuss bike fitting philosophy with Andy Pruitt and Todd Carver? You have found the right place. This is exactly what happens on this episode of Cycling in Alignment. Buckle your BOA’s down for an engaging discussion from multiple angles on the subject of bike fitting. 

This episode is a “Cross Pod” with Fast Talk Labs. We recorded in the FTL studio in Boulder, with Chris and Trevor there to moderate. Trevor was mostly trying to keep us on track but we wandered into some interesting weeds and told some obtuse stories. 

Thank you Fasttalk Labs for allowing me to publish this on my channel too. I am sure my audience will find it a worthwhile discussion on the topic of fitting.

---------------------------------

Fast Talk Labs' Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fasttalklabs/

Fast Talk Labs on the Web: https://www.fasttalklabs.com

This episode of Cycling in Alignment with Colby Pearce is a discussion about five minute intervals; how do do them, the relationship of power, HR and RPE, and why we care. When I say “discussion” I mean a conversation between the 2 Geminii living in my mind space… 

I also introduce the concept of Dynamic Threshold Power, a concept created by my Team EF Coaching colleague, Peter Schep. Don’t worry, this episode is not all technical bicycle dork stuff, I also manage to fit a bit of philosophy in there. 

Team EF Coaching on the Web: http://www.TeamEFCoaching.com 

Today’s podcast is with Chek Institute faculty member and osteopath Matt Wallden. Matt was my instructor for the most recent course in the curriculum of the Chek Academy: Integrated Movement Specialist level 3 [IMS3]. In our discussion we cover a broad range of topics including attractor states, Panjabi’s model, and the benefits of barefoot / minimal shoe movement and exercise. Matt worked as the UK distributor for Vibram for about a decade and has a lot of experience in working with athletes in minimal footwear; he is also very well educated on the science of how footwear choices impact athletic performance. We discuss how the human foot negotiates the rigid structure of a cycling shoe, and Matt also educates me on how to pronounce Vibram [hint: Americans say it incorrectly]. We also discuss the forward flexed position of cyclists and the ramifications of this posture. As always, please leave comments or questions on this episode below, and thank you for listening. 

-------------------------

Show Notes:

Matt Wallden's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/matthewwallden/

Check Institute's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chekinstitute/

Matt on the Web: http://www.mattwallden.com

This episode of Cycling in Alignment is with author and bike fitter Phil Cavell. I found his book The Midlife Cyclist: The Road Map for the +40 Rider Who Wants to Train Hard, Ride Fast and Stay Healthy to be an excellent read that is loaded with insightful explorations and nuggets of wisdom. Phil notes that it has only been for the last few hundred years that humans started living past their forties in significant numbers, and only in the last few decades have those people started riding and racing what he terms “A Victorian contraption” [bicycles]. Now, there are masters athletes exercising at a high level into their 60’s and 70’s. This opens a discussion about the positives and negatives of high load athletic lifestyle choices on an aging body. Phil consults a number of experts for his book, including four cardiologists, and the results are fascinating. 

As always, thank you for listening to Cycling in Alignment with Colby Pearce. I appreciate your comments and feedback on this episode in the comments below. 

REFERENCES:

https://twitter.com/PhilCavell

https://www.cyclefit.co.uk

This solo episode breaks down the muscles of the Inner Core. What is the difference between an efficient rider who effortlessly pedals with a supple, smooth muscle, versus a clunky cyclist who seems to wrestle the bike with every pedal stroke? One athlete is using the tonic fibres of the muscles, saving the phasic fibres for when it counts. The second type of rider breaks out the phasic muscle fibers at all intensities, and exhausts their energy before they can see the finish line or complete an effort.

In this wandering examination of anatomy, I talk about the muscles of the Inner Core, why we need it, what muscles are in it, and common exercises we might use to train these muscles. 

Screen shots courtesy of Visible Body app.

RESOURCES:

Chek Institute Four Point Tummy Vacuum: https://chekinstitute.com/freegifts847386/TheInnerUnit.pdf

Today’s podcast is basically a solo rant on how cycling is a unique sport. Not because of the drama, not because it is beautiful temple of suffering. Not because it is a blend of art and effort. We know all that stuff. If you want to read about the majesty of cycling, see 999 other posts made today, tomorrow, and the next day. 

Only Cycling is about how cycling completely ignores fundamental rules of basic movement dynamics, human physiology, and biomechanics, and why it is the only sport to really do this. There are a few other examples of this in other sports, but cycling is #1 at ignoring the basics of what is universally understood in the study of movement as ideal posture, otherwise know as the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation. 

As always, thanks for listening and please leave any comments here or on Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/cyclinginalignment/). I am grateful for your time, energy, and input. 

For this episode of Cycling in Alignment I speak with US racing legend Alex Howes. Alex is a former US Professional Road Champion, recent winner of Ned Gravel, winner of the Steamboat Gravel race [the big one without the vowels in the name; see below...], Tour de France veteran, husband, and father. I have had the honor of coaching Alex for a good part of his cycling adventure…”uncoachable” is his own description, but I found him to be intuitive [instead of data focused], practically minded, solution oriented, loyal to the core, and to have an authentic, deep passion for the sport. We unpack all kinds of thoughts on eating during races, training load, and coaching methods. Comments? Suggestions? Please hit me here on the IG feed. Thanks for listening. 

Alex Howes’ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/Alex_Howes

Alex on the Web: http://www.TeamEFCoaching.com 

Steamboat Gravel Race on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sbtgrvl/

This week’s guest on Cycling in Alignment is Team EF Coaching colleague Travis McCabe. Travis is an experienced racer who has won at the national and international level, including the stages at the Herald Sun Tour [Australia] and the Tour of Langkawi [Malaysia]. He is also a former US Professional Criterium Champion. In our discussion, Travis outlines why he has begun his journey into coaching after a long and successful racing career, and he discusses some of the coaching and mentor influences he has had in his athletic journey. We also unpack some of his methods in coaching and understanding the context of total life load in working with athletes.

Do you have feedback on this episode? Questions for Travis? Reach out on the comments below and let us know, we will get back to you. 

Find Jesse at the following places:

WEB:

https://www.teamefcoaching.com/coaches/travis-mccabe/

INSTAGRAM: 

@travis_mccabe

OTHER RESOURCES: 

Marcel Kittel Tour de France intensity breakdown: 

https://www.outsideonline.com/health/training-performance/tour-de-france-physiology-research/

This episode is about old school bike fitting beliefs that need to be assassinated. Bike fitting is filled with a lot of ancient “wisdom” that has lingered and lurked in the shadows of our collective cycling consciousness for a long time, misdirecting athletes in ways that have long lasting ramifications on their fiction and longevity in the sport. Occasionally, we find a few of these ideas to have a good “rule of thumb” foundation but most of them are garbage. I unpack a few of the most common misunderstandings about bike fitting and explain why they need to die. Elevate your understanding of the topic by listening to my words. Did you learn something? Let me know. Do you disagree? Enlighten me on your perspective, we can have a discourse. I invite open, honest discussion.