
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The traditional approach to developing employer value propositions can often be complex and time-consuming. While this in-depth methodology might work well for large, complex organizations, many employers invest months or even years in exhaustive research and complex frameworks only to often end up with EVPs that sound remarkably similar to their competitors. At the same time, there's growing pressure to activate employer brands quickly to address immediate talent needs, leaving organizations vulnerable to missed opportunities if they get caught in endless cycles of research and refinement.
So, how can companies develop distinctive EVPs that genuinely differentiate them while moving quickly enough to address urgent talent challenges?
My guest this week is Sam Monteath, founder of research and insights consultancy Reason Why, a research and insights consultancy. Sam shares valuable insights on how organizations can take a more agile approach to EVPs, avoiding the bloat and unnecessary complexity that often characterizes these projects.
In the interview, we discuss:
• [01:22] The key differences between employer brand, employer branding, and EVP
• [04:58] Why some EVP development processes have become unnecessarily complex
• [06:54] How organizations can balance speed with rigor in developing their EVPs
• [09:55] What is a minimum viable EVP?
• [12:28] Why so many EVPs sound similar, and how companies can genuinely differentiate themselves
• [15:38] How employer branding has evolved over the past decade
• [18:57] The role of AI and technology in transforming employer brand strategy
• [20:52] How AI is revolutionizing qualitative data analysis for EVP insights
• [22:21] The shift toward more dynamic, evolving EVPs connected to business objectives
• [23:53] What does the future of employer branding look like
Follow this podcast on Apple Podcasts
Follow this podcast on Spotify.
By Matt Alder4.7
7777 ratings
The traditional approach to developing employer value propositions can often be complex and time-consuming. While this in-depth methodology might work well for large, complex organizations, many employers invest months or even years in exhaustive research and complex frameworks only to often end up with EVPs that sound remarkably similar to their competitors. At the same time, there's growing pressure to activate employer brands quickly to address immediate talent needs, leaving organizations vulnerable to missed opportunities if they get caught in endless cycles of research and refinement.
So, how can companies develop distinctive EVPs that genuinely differentiate them while moving quickly enough to address urgent talent challenges?
My guest this week is Sam Monteath, founder of research and insights consultancy Reason Why, a research and insights consultancy. Sam shares valuable insights on how organizations can take a more agile approach to EVPs, avoiding the bloat and unnecessary complexity that often characterizes these projects.
In the interview, we discuss:
• [01:22] The key differences between employer brand, employer branding, and EVP
• [04:58] Why some EVP development processes have become unnecessarily complex
• [06:54] How organizations can balance speed with rigor in developing their EVPs
• [09:55] What is a minimum viable EVP?
• [12:28] Why so many EVPs sound similar, and how companies can genuinely differentiate themselves
• [15:38] How employer branding has evolved over the past decade
• [18:57] The role of AI and technology in transforming employer brand strategy
• [20:52] How AI is revolutionizing qualitative data analysis for EVP insights
• [22:21] The shift toward more dynamic, evolving EVPs connected to business objectives
• [23:53] What does the future of employer branding look like
Follow this podcast on Apple Podcasts
Follow this podcast on Spotify.

323 Listeners

392 Listeners

1,639 Listeners

179 Listeners

494 Listeners

708 Listeners

702 Listeners

91 Listeners

3,988 Listeners

9,159 Listeners

659 Listeners

145 Listeners

86 Listeners

416 Listeners

520 Listeners

416 Listeners

40 Listeners

809 Listeners

53 Listeners

2,166 Listeners

56 Listeners

5,470 Listeners

27 Listeners

164 Listeners