Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

By True Crime TodayNews True Crime News Commentary

Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers episodes

October 05, 2023 Did Delphi Investigators Really Miss The Odinistic Evidence For 6 Years?
Is the Delphi murder case veering into the realm of ancient pagan rituals, or is this a strategic move by the defense?
In a riveting episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delves deep into the recent 136-page filing by Richard Allen's attorney, which suggests a chilling narrative: the girls were ritualistically sacrificed by members of a pagan Norse religion, known as Odinism, that has been co-opted by white nationalists. The allegations even extend to some detectives and prison guards involved in the case.

Brueski sought the insights of Psychologist John Delatorre to unpack the implications of this filing. Delatorre's initial reaction was one of skepticism. "There's a lot that suggests that they're just trying to overwhelm the opposing side with paperwork," he remarked. He further questioned the timing of this revelation, noting the rarity of investigations with zero leaks. "If something like that had happened, you would think that we would be hearing about this as an audience a lot earlier," Delatorre added.

The defense's argument hinges on the alleged presence of symbols near the bodies, which they claim are indicative of Odinism. They question why the police didn't pursue these leads, especially given that some of the symbols reportedly mimic images found on an individual's Facebook page.

Brueski raised a pertinent question: "Why are we just hearing about it now?" Delatorre responded by emphasizing the commonality of finding debris, like sticks, in the area where the girls were found. He also pointed out that if ritualistic sacrifices were common in the area, there would likely be more victims.

The conversation then shifted to the broader concept of ritualistic sacrifices in contemporary society. Delatorre clarified that ritualism doesn't necessarily imply a religious undertone. "Ritualism, for the most part, just simply means that a person has a regimented way in which they're going to engage in the killing," he explained. He further noted that while Odinism has been co-opted by white supremacists, ritualistic sacrifices weren't a part of Norse mythology, the origin of Odinism.

Delatorre also touched upon the historical use of ritualistic sacrifices as propaganda to demonize non-Christian ideologies. "It's often been used as propaganda... by making the public believe that this is the kind of thing that they engage in," he said.

Brueski then delved into the specifics of ritualistic killings, questioning whether they always involve a ceremonial aspect. Delatorre clarified that while there would be some ceremony, it wouldn't necessarily align with the stereotypical imagery of cloaked figures and altars. "For them, for the individual to commit the murder, they have to believe that the murder is justified," Delatorre explained. This belief in the righteousness of their act might lead them to add ceremonial elements to the killing.

In conclusion, the Delphi murder case's recent filing has added a layer of complexity and intrigue. While the defense presents a narrative steeped in ancient rituals, experts like Delatorre urge caution, emphasizing the need to differentiate between individual crimes and religious practices.

As the case unfolds, one is left pondering: Is the defense unveiling a dark underbelly of ritualistic practices, or is this a calculated move to introduce doubt? Only the court's verdict will reveal the truth.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

9 min
October 05, 2023 How Mommy Bloggers Started a Cult Without Even Knowing It
Is it possible that in seeking help, one could inadvertently be led into a cult-like grip? A recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with host Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott delves deep into such a case surrounding Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt. The revelations that emerge from their discussion underscore the crucial need for vigilance in the therapeutic community.

According to the dialogue, it appears Hildebrandt might have been practicing what some referred to as a cult-like form of therapy. The burning question: "Does anybody realize they're starting a cult when they're starting a cult?" is one that Shavaun Scott tackled head-on. "I do think it's the person... that is the focus or the genesis of something like that... a person who always is seeking power," Scott explains, identifying profound narcissism and sociopathic tendencies as key indicators.

Hildebrandt, whose practices are under scrutiny, reportedly made untraditional and potentially damaging diagnoses. Tony Brueski recounted how couples who approached her for marriage counseling got something entirely different. "A lot of separating people, a lot of diagnosing men with porn addictions when there wasn't one," he said, emphasizing the lack of recognition of such a diagnosis in the DSM 5, a standard classification of mental disorders.

Scott expressed her dismay at the revelation. "That is really what makes this a cult because she was making up her belief system as she went," Scott said. Her concern is palpable, as she mentions the "toxic craziness" that many might have been exposed to under Hildebrandt’s guidance. The horrifying truth, according to Scott, is the legitimacy that came with Hildebrandt's clinical license, which led people to trust her expertise, only to be led astray.

A pressing concern arises: how did Hildebrandt's practices go unnoticed for so long? Scott elaborates on the licensing procedures, which differ from state to state. "Usually, once a person is licensed, there's probably not a lot, if any oversight going on, unless there are complaints," she detailed. The primary role of licensing boards is to protect consumers, and they are obligated to investigate any complaints about licensed professionals rigorously. In Hildebrandt’s case, however, Scott questions the oversight and wonders whether the investigations were as thorough as they ought to have been.

Given the gravity of the charges against Hildebrandt and the harm caused to countless individuals seeking help, the need for more rigorous checks and greater transparency becomes clear. Trust is a foundational pillar in the therapeutic relationship. It's crucial for patients to know that when they reach out for assistance, they are in safe hands, guided by genuine expertise.

As the story unfolds and more people come forward with their experiences, there is hope for change. Scott passionately articulates this hope: "Lessons learned by the licensing board here." Yet, one can't help but wonder how many have been deeply affected by the dubious practices, and what it will take to ensure such situations are detected and addressed promptly in the future.

In a world where the lines between genuine care and manipulation can sometimes blur, how do we ensure that those seeking help aren't led astray?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

7 min
October 04, 2023 How Far Off the Rails Did Jodi Hildebrandt's Therapy Sessions Go?
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, the shocking practices of former counselor Jodi Hildebrandt were brought to the limelight. Just how influential were Hildebrandt's methods in the destruction of countless marriages?

Before her arrest, Jodi Hildebrandt was a practicing therapist known for her unique and highly controversial counseling methods. As described by the podcast hosts, many of her former clients now claim that her techniques and teachings either directly caused or played a significant role in their divorces. Hildebrandt was known to separate spouses, pathologize patients' behaviors using non-DSM-5 recognized addictions, and encouraged individuals to isolate from those not adhering to her teachings.

Psychologist John Delatorre, a guest on the podcast, expressed his concerns. "It sounds like she was never on a path to begin with," Delatorre said, suggesting that Hildebrandt might be fitting into the stereotype of the "wounded healer" – individuals who join the mental health field to address their traumas but instead inflict harm due to unresolved personal issues.

Tony Brueski brought to attention that despite brief suspension in 2012, Hildebrandt regained her license shortly afterward and continued her practices. The Mormon church even stopped recommending her due to her disclosing sensitive HIPAA information. The question of how Hildebrandt managed to evade significant consequences for such a long time is perplexing.

Delatorre explained that every licensed provider has a licensing board aimed at protecting the general public. He highlighted, “The licensing board isn't going to know what's going on unless you tell them." The issue might stem from the hesitation of clients or institutions to raise a complaint against their therapists. And while Hildebrandt might appear as an outlier, Delatorre was quick to note she's not unique. Many counselors face charges by their licensing boards for various unethical practices.

Addressing the question of how much freedom therapists have in choosing their counseling methods, Delatorre said, “Some individuals have integrated, right? So they take pieces of all different kinds of theories and mold it into one." He went on to discuss the danger of therapists becoming too rigid in their ideologies, leading them to dismiss alternative viewpoints and therapies. This isolation can cause them to become even more entrenched in their beliefs.

From Brueski's description, it appears Hildebrandt took an extreme stance, with some former clients even suggesting she had a vendetta against men. Delatorre responded, “She's the only one that knows if she had an agenda… or if this was just a secondary aspect of being so regimented in her own ideals.”

The narrative of Jodi Hildebrandt's counseling methods, as laid out in the podcast, paints a worrying picture of unchecked practices that might have harmed more than they helped. It serves as a grim reminder of the significant role and responsibility that mental health professionals hold in their clients' lives.

As the episode concluded, one question lingered: How many more "Jodi Hildebrandts" are out there, and what safeguards are in place to prevent further harm?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

8 min
October 04, 2023 How Did Jodi Hildebrandt's 'ConneXions' Not Get Shut Down Sooner?
"How often do people actually file complaints against their therapists, and how often should they?" This pressing question was tackled head-on in a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," with host Tony Brueski and guest psychotherapist and author, Shavaun Scott. Their discussion zeroed in on the intricacies of the mental health profession and provided deep insights into the dilemmas faced by patients.

Many therapy seekers presume that an occasional mismatch with a therapist is just a matter of differing perspectives, often concluding, "We just don't see eye to eye." Yet, Shavaun Scott raises a flag, stating, "I don't think as many people complain and make a formal complaint as they probably should." While there's a distinction between being uncomfortable with feedback and flagging inappropriate advice, the conversation circled the need for an empowered stance.

Discussing the potential pitfalls, Shavaun touched on the gray areas. “There are times when a therapist may be giving someone feedback, and the person just doesn't want to hear it," she elaborated. However, she also pointed out the detrimental side of the spectrum, where therapists provide bizarre suggestions or those that might exacerbate a patient's issues, particularly in couples or parenting counseling.

The ability to file complaints online has simplified the process. Ideally, a legitimate complaint would prompt the licensing board to ask the therapist in question to justify their methods. But can this process be easily circumvented? Taking the case of Jodi Hildebrandt as an example, Brueski questioned the ease with which someone could merely fabricate an acceptable explanation. Shavaun admitted, “She certainly could lie,” but highlighted instances in California where evidentiary hearings forced clinicians to defend their practices in person.

But what happens when therapists themselves are battling with their own mental health issues? Can personal experiences overshadow professional recommendations? There's a vast difference between therapists with genuinely altruistic intentions and those who might be termed "dangerous quacks." Shavaun acknowledges this continuum, noting the rigorous process involved in becoming a licensed mental health clinician. Yet, she admits, “you do get some weird ones in there,” drawing parallels with varying expertise levels in any profession, from medicine to hairdressing.

Stressing the importance of due diligence, Shavaun advises potential clients to be diligent consumers, especially when dealing with sensitive areas like marriage or parent-child relationship counseling. "Do interviews before you choose a professional," she suggests. A 15 to 30-minute preliminary phone call can offer significant insights into a therapist's approach and expertise. She adds, "Talk to at least three, and don’t make a choice until you’ve talked with someone that you feel really is insightful.”

The conversation took a sharp turn when Brueski mentioned how some professionals, like Jodi Hildebrandt, gained business through endorsements from religious bodies or other authority figures. An implicit trust often accompanies such recommendations, but the episode underscores the need for personal agency and informed decisions.
Concluding our deep dive into this provocative podcast episode, one can't help but wonder, "In our quest for healing and understanding, how do we ensure we're placing our trust in the right hands?"
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

8 min
October 03, 2023 Alex Murdaugh Can't Stop Screwing Over People, Even Behind Bars
Is Alex Murdaugh entrusting his assets to the federal government a selfless act or another crafty move in a series of disturbing decisions?
In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delved into the latest move by Alex Murdaugh's legal team, which involves the attempt to hand over control of Murdaugh's assets to the federal government. The defense posits this approach as a method to bypass any extra fees that a special referee might extract, aiming to ensure victims get their full dues. However, the fact that this proposal emanates from the camp of Murdaugh, a figure riddled with controversy, naturally raises eyebrows.

Psychologist John Delatorre weighed in on the matter, remarking, "I do think he cares where the money is going to, and I think he cares that it's only ever going to him." Delatorre further pointed out that Murdaugh isn’t someone to think several steps ahead but has made impromptu decisions throughout his life.

A pressing concern is the inherent irony of Murdaugh's request. Given his history, can he genuinely critique the fee-taking practices of others? Delatorre opined, "I do think that this is a pot calling a kettle black." He further elaborated that, to him, Murdaugh appears more concerned about asset management than mending his tarnished reputation.

Brueski, reflecting on how this move could play out in public perception, mused, "If the government gets it and then distributes it correctly right away, it actually looks pretty good for Alex." Yet, if this maneuver creates an additional hurdle for victims trying to retrieve their rightful money, the optics could be disastrously detrimental for Murdaugh.

As the conversation shifted, a notable declaration from Murdaugh's attorneys surfaced. Despite the apparent financial constraints, both have confirmed they would represent Murdaugh pro bono in any potential second murder trial. Delatorre pondered the motivation behind this commitment, questioning whether these attorneys might have already financially benefited from their association with Murdaugh or whether they see the extensive media coverage as a more valuable asset than direct remuneration.

However, Delatorre also highlighted a crucial aspect: "If I was Alec Murdoch, I'd be concerned because they already lost. So why am I going to get with a team that lost only just to lose again?"

While the media spotlight remains fixated on Murdaugh, and as legal representatives jockey for their position in this unfolding drama, there’s a broader question at play.

Is Alex Murdaugh, with all the mounting evidence and public scrutiny, an indefensible client or a high-profile challenge that could be a crown jewel for any attorney's career?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

6 min
October 03, 2023 Will Kouri Richin's Lies to Clients Seep Into Murder Trial?
When accusations of murder surround an individual, often the inclination is to look at other aspects of their life for patterns or evidence of duplicity or recklessness. This seems to be exactly the case with Kouri Richins, who, even before murder accusations surfaced, was involved in a very different kind of controversy: a lawsuit regarding a home sale.

As Tony Brueski, the host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, illuminated, there have been recent developments concerning Richins' life as a home flipper. "We're now hearing more people coming out of the woodwork who didn't have anything to do with Kouri and the murder accusations or that part of her life, but her life as a home flipper and not such a good one," Brueski notes.

The issue at hand is a lawsuit filed against Richins six months prior to the murder accusations. The plaintiffs claim near financial devastation after purchasing a house from Richins, citing hazardous mold levels and resulting medical problems. The lawsuit alleges that Richins, "recklessly and without regard for the truth... misrepresented important facts about the properties."

Such assertions seem to be consistent with other characterizations of Richins. As the podcast host commented, "it's kind of par for the course from what we know about Cori and her ability to lie and just move on from people." Shavaun Scott, the psychotherapist and author on the podcast, concurred, highlighting that "reckless and without regard for the truth" indeed nails the situation. Scott further elaborated, noting the dangerous aspects of Richins' personality. "We're talking about a person who's fairly high on the psychopathy checklist here," Scott stated, "She's not operating from a place that most of us have this internal thing that we call a conscience."

Scott's insights indicate a chilling side of Richins - someone who seemingly sees life as a series of roles, whether it's as a business person, a mother, or a wife. But these roles are merely facades, behind which lies a more troubling and potentially dangerous nature. The true query becomes: if these murder accusations hadn't come to light, what could have been next in Richins' unpredictable trajectory?

Yet, as intriguing and vital as these revelations about Richins' business practices might be, there remains a crucial legal question. Will these issues find their way into the murder trial as character evidence? Brueski poses the question, considering how critical lying is to the murder trial's foundation. While Scott acknowledges that she isn't an attorney, she speculates, based on other trials, that such evidence might not make it into the courtroom. However, if a psychological evaluation were ever conducted on Richins, this evidence could certainly influence her diagnosis.

The situation bears a resemblance to the Alex Murdaugh trial, where unintentional revelations shifted the trial's dynamics. Such cases remind us that the line between personal and professional, between one aspect of life and another, can be perilously thin.

As we consider Kouri Richins' tale, we're left with a question as haunting as the murder accusations themselves: In a world of facades, how many others live among us, hiding behind the roles they play?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

6 min
October 02, 2023 How Matt Richards Went From Youth Pastor & Father To Homicidal Maniac
What could possibly drive a youth pastor, a man sworn to the moral teachings of faith and community, to violently attack his own wife and children? This chilling question recently gripped listeners of the podcast "Hidden Killers" as Tony Brueski and Psychologist John Delatorre delved deep into the case of Matthew Lee Richards.

Richards, in the throes of financial despair and facing imminent eviction, attempted to murder his wife and five children, all of whom, astoundingly, survived the ordeal. Brueski was quick to draw parallels with another infamous case: "Just as we had talked about with Alex Murdaugh, everybody was surprised and shocked at how could a father kill their family or go after them in such a heinous way because of finances."

Delatorre analyzed the psychology behind such grim actions: "In this guy's mind, he's clearly thinking that being evicted is the worst thing that's ever going to happen to them. In reality, that's not true." He expounded on the pressure many men often feel, coupled with an inability to communicate or express their anxieties, that can lead them down a path of isolation and eventual breakdown.

One of the most jarring revelations in the discussion was that none of the family members were even aware of the looming eviction. Richards hadn't shared a word about their financial predicament. This glaring absence of communication raised probing questions. Delatorre pondered, "This could have been very easily solved had the two communicated? Had he talked to his wife about the problems that were going on?" But instead, Richards's silence and subsequent violent actions suggested either a premeditated plan or a spontaneous mental break.

The intricacies of the attack, however, don't paint a clear picture. Despite the severe injuries inflicted on his family, such as his son’s exposed internal organs or another’s slashed throat, everyone miraculously survived. Was this another of Richards's failures, or was there an underlying hesitation in his actions? Delatorre’s assessment was blunt: "I think that he was just a failure."

The episode underscored the complex interplay between financial pressure, societal expectations, and the male psyche. Delatorre highlighted the importance of open communication, both with partners and within communities, to prevent such tragic events.

"By avoiding it, he certainly made the problem a lot worse," Delatorre observed. He further emphasized the significance of reaching out, saying, "had he just been open and honest about everything that was going on from the beginning... he probably could have avoided a lot of issues."

In today’s society, where the facades of social media often mask the raw, uncomfortable realities of life, the case of Matthew Lee Richards serves as a chilling reminder of the consequences that can result from internalizing struggles.

A Failed Attempt or a Cry for Help?

Despite the gruesome nature of Richards's assault, all his family members lived. Does this fact offer any deeper insight into Richards's mental state during the attack? Was there a hidden ambivalence in his intent? Did he truly wish to annihilate his family, or was there a subconscious desire for them to survive? And if this were the case, was his violent outbreak a plea for intervention or a desperate cry for help?

These harrowing questions remain, emphasizing the need for society to remain vigilant, compassionate, and supportive, especially towards those showing signs of distress.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

7 min
October 02, 2023 Are Alex Murdaugh's Attorneys TOO CLOSE To Their Client?
Do the recent actions of Alex Murdaugh's defense team reveal a genuine desire to help victims, or is it just another strategic ploy? This topic has recently been explored on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and guest psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott.

Recently, Murdaugh's defense attorneys have sought the federal government's intervention to manage his assets. Given that these assets were set to be distributed to the victims and their families, this move is interesting, to say the least. The defense team suggests that handing over control to the government would ensure the victims receive their dues without third-party fees. This would bypass the originally intended company, Lay and McCoy, and save several hundred thousand dollars. Brueski pointed out the possible ulterior motives, stating, "This could go either way. Either they're really trying to be... Frugal with the money, or they're trying to put another roadblock up."

Scott, the psychotherapist, was skeptical about the defense team's true intentions. "It's hard to assign a motive of altruism on that side at all," she said. One theory proposed by Brueski is the defense team's attempt to repaint Murdaugh's image in a positive light in anticipation of a possible new murder trial. The acts of 'good deeds' might be utilized to present a reformed image of Murdaugh in the court of public opinion.

The podcast went on to discuss the peculiar relationship between Murdaugh and his defense attorneys, Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin. When asked if they'd represent Murdaugh for free in a potential new murder trial, the response was affirmative. This has led many to speculate whether a significant advance payment might've been made or if their ongoing loyalty is a product of an "odd enmeshment", as Scott described it. Brueski added, "It's they're all good old boys. All part of that club."

Scott found the close relationship puzzling, considering Murdaugh's stained history. "He's still such a sleazy, creepy guy. He has caused so much harm and hurt so many people." The defense team's unwavering support, despite the overwhelming evidence of Murdaugh's wrongdoings, raises questions about their professional judgment. Do personal relationships blur the lines between professional obligations and personal feelings?

Brueski contemplated the role personal belief might play in a defense attorney's representation. Does an attorney's belief in their client's innocence make them more effective? "If you already have made up your mind early on because of that personal relationship, does that make you a better representative of your client?" he wondered.

Scott found it challenging to understand why an upright individual would choose to be closely associated with someone like Murdaugh, given the extensive evidence of his malevolent actions. Brueski, while acknowledging the vital role of defense attorneys, highlighted the compartmentalization necessary for their profession. The duo concluded that it's quite baffling how Murdaugh's defense team seems ready and eager to represent him again, given the complications of the trial.

In the shadowy world of legal battles, the line between genuine intent and strategic maneuvering often blurs. With Murdaugh's case, as the layers peel back, one has to wonder: Are his attorneys genuinely convinced of his innocence, or is their support part of a larger strategic play?

So, as this saga continues to unravel, we are left with one pressing question: When it comes to the intricate dance of legal defense, where does strategy end and personal belief begin?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

7 min
October 01, 2023 WEEK IN REVIEW-What Is Odinism And How Does It Relate To Delphi Murders
Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

8 min
October 01, 2023 WEEK IN REVIEW-Is Kouri Richins Incapable Of Telling The Truth?
Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

5 min

About Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

From the publisher's feed

Welcome to Mind Behind The Crime, the authoritative podcast that grants you exclusive access to the profound insights of respected psychologists, psychotherapists, and mental health experts as they…