Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

By True Crime TodayNewsTrue CrimeNews Commentary
Download on the App Store

Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers episodes

  • Should the King Road House Stay?
    This weekend on the "Hidden Killers Podcast with Tony Brueski," we take a solemn journey back through time as we mark one year since the tragic events that rocked the University of Idaho community. Join us as we delve into the intricate case against Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of a crime that claimed the lives of four bright young students. As the legal proceedings continue to unfold, we revisit the details that emerged over the past year, dissecting the developments and potential implications for justice and the legal system. Amidst our exploration, we pause to honor the memories of the victims, ensuring that while we scrutinize the case's complexities, we never lose sight of the human stories at its core. Tune in for a reflective and thought-provoking examination of a case that continues to captivate and horrify a nation, only on the "Hidden Killers Podcast."
     Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    11 min
  • Life or Death Sentence, What Helps Victims Mental Health The Most
    This weekend on the "Hidden Killers Podcast with Tony Brueski," we take a solemn journey back through time as we mark one year since the tragic events that rocked the University of Idaho community. Join us as we delve into the intricate case against Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of a crime that claimed the lives of four bright young students. As the legal proceedings continue to unfold, we revisit the details that emerged over the past year, dissecting the developments and potential implications for justice and the legal system. Amidst our exploration, we pause to honor the memories of the victims, ensuring that while we scrutinize the case's complexities, we never lose sight of the human stories at its core. Tune in for a reflective and thought-provoking examination of a case that continues to captivate and horrify a nation, only on the "Hidden Killers Podcast."
     Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    9 min
  • Is Lori Vallow Daybell the Definition of Evil On Earth?
    Can a person be inherently evil, devoid of the basic human emotions that guide our moral compass? This unsettling question surfaces as we delve into the disturbing case of Lori Vallow Daybell, which has been a subject of intense scrutiny on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski. In a recent episode, Brueski and Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert Susan Constantine analyze the chilling mindset of Vallow Daybell, whose case continues to unfold.
     
     Governor Brad Little's recent signing of an executive agreement to extradite Vallow Daybell to Arizona on conspiracy to commit murder charges ensures that the public eye will once again be trained on her. "The question is not just about legal fitness to stand trial but about the moral incomprehensibility of her actions," remarks Constantine. The case draws a grim portrait of a woman enshrouded in her convictions so deeply that they've led to heinous crimes.
     
     Reflecting on Vallow Daybell's sentencing hearing, Constantine observed, "It was shocking to watch her demeanor... She really believed it." Vallow Daybell's words seemed to echo a warped sense of reality, talking about her deceased children's jobs in heaven. This behavior strikes at the core of the issue: whether Vallow Daybell is spinning a narrative she believes to be true, or if it is an act to manipulate those around her.
     
     Her involvement in a string of deaths, including those of her children and former husband, has branded her in the public eye as the "Doomsday Mom," a title that speaks to the apocalyptic beliefs she shared with her fifth husband, Chad Daybell. The couple’s beliefs, which included the idea that her children had become "zombies," led to an alarming series of events culminating in the tragic deaths.
     
     Constantine shares a chilling perspective: "There are very few humans on this planet that are just plain evil... I believe there is something that happens to them at the core of their being." The discussion delves into the nature of evil, examining whether individuals like Vallow Daybell are a product of their environment or if their malevolence is innate.
     
     Tony Brueski questions the efficacy and purpose of putting Vallow Daybell on trial again, considering she's already serving a life sentence without parole. "Does it make sense to re-traumatize the families... for someone who's never going to admit their guilt?" Constantine responds with a hard truth: "At what point in time do you just wave the white flag and give up?"
     
     The conversation turns metaphysical as Constantine recounts her own experiences with defendants transforming in front of her, suggesting that Vallow Daybell may be under the influence of a profound darkness. "They don't have those normal feelings like humans have," Constantine asserts. She suggests that this darkness is beyond the realm of mental illness—it is a pure, undiluted evil.
     
     Further exploration into the mind of Vallow Daybell touches on the psychological journey that leads someone down such a dark path. The podcast discusses the possibility of indoctrination and the role of a narcissistic and antisocial personality disorder in shaping a person's psyche to become capable of such crimes.
     
     This article poses probing questions about the essence of evil and the human capacity for change, painting a stark picture of a woman caught in the abyss of her delusions. As Lori Vallow Daybell prepares to face the courts once more, one must wonder, what is the threshold for redemption in the eyes of society, and can someone like her ever cross it? Or is the true face of evil one that remains shrouded in darkness, beyond the reach of empathy and remorse?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com


    7 min
  • Maya Kowalski And the Countless Victims of Dr. Sally Smith's 'Judgement'
    It's every parent's nightmare: a medical institution diagnosing their child, and then a subsequent loss of custody based on questionable claims. But when the institutions you trust begin to make unverifiable assumptions about parents, what remains of justice? On a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, a concerning pattern emerged during a conversation with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine.
     
      Brueski broached a concerning topic regarding Dr. Smith, whose role at Johns Hopkins Children's Hospital appeared to be absent of the checks and balances we often associate with justice. This lack of oversight led Constantine to reveal a startling connection. "Okay. So there is a route to all of this," she began. In Orlando, a psychological firm wrote a book on Munchausen's by proxy disorder. Constantine noted that despite it being a rare condition, there's been a significant influx of women diagnosed in that area.
     
      Contrary to the conventional understanding of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, where a guardian may fake a child's illness, these mothers are accused of the opposite – trying to help their children recover from genuine health issues.
     
      Constantine goes on to claim, "Here is the person that wrote this book that literally removed the children from my dear friend of 40 years." Though she is able to read people well, being a body language expert, she has seen no signs of Munchausen's by proxy disorder in her friend. Instead, she describes an alarming pattern in which women, primarily mothers, are being wrongly diagnosed by a forensic psychologist, now colloquially termed as "Dr. XYZ moms".
     
      This chain of diagnosis and removal of children has extensive implications, particularly in child custody battles. "The courts say you have to go through counseling for co-parenting... and whoever it is that has the biggest, widest pockets," Constantine explains. Those with more financial means, typically fathers, can exploit this diagnosis to gain full custody of their children. With the false diagnosis of Munchausen's by proxy disorder, mothers are effectively removed from their children's lives, permanently.
     
      Complicating the matter further is the monetization of this system. This Orlando-based firm, according to Constantine, charges large sums for evaluations, leaving countless families grappling with not only the loss of their children but significant financial burdens as well.
     
      Brueski's probing question about the motive behind such actions illuminates a larger issue. "Is this something where overall there needs to be reform in the entire system?" he asks. Indeed, Constantine points to the formation of collaborative law groups that control a significant portion of these processes. These groups, comprised of forensic psychologists and arbitrators for custody battles, form a tightly-knit community. The implication is clear: expose one, and the whole system might collapse.
     
      It's a sobering realization when those tasked with justice seem entwined in questionable practices. Constantine's revelations, interwoven with personal experiences and ties to those affected, paint a disturbing picture. One where justice isn't just blind; it might also be compromised.
     
      At the heart of this narrative is the issue of training, or rather the lack of it. Constantine describes her experience with training workers in the Department of Children and Families. Their lack of expertise and inadequate training leaves them ill-equipped to handle sensitive family matters, leading to decisions that often rip families apart.
     
      In concluding the interview, Brueski and Constantine shed light on an urgent need for reform and proper training. With families being torn apart based on unverified and often false diagnoses, the question becomes: How many more lives will be shattered before the system rights its wrongs?Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    10 min
  • Why Lori Vallow Daybell Will Never Feel Remorse for Murders
    Can someone truly be devoid of guilt in the face of heinous crimes? The "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski takes a deep dive into the twisted mind of Lori Vallow Daybell as she faces extradition to Arizona on conspiracy to commit murder charges. The hosts, alongside Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert Susan Constantine, explore the complexities of Lori's mental state and the legal ramifications it holds.
     
     The podcast discussion opens with the impending journey for Lori, whose case has grabbed headlines and chilled the public to the bone. Governor Brad Little's signing of the executive agreement to extradite Lori raises the question once more – is she fit to stand trial?
     
     Constantine sheds light on Lori's sentencing hearing, where Lori's speech about the children and heaven struck many as a disturbing narrative spun by a deluded mind. "I think she believes wholeheartedly the tale that she's spinning," Constantine says. According to her, Lori's demeanor suggested a deep-seated conviction in her own narrative, indicative of a cult-like belief system.
     
     The conversation turns darker as the experts ponder whether Lori possesses any guilt or shame for her actions. "She thinks that what she did was right," Constantine reveals, a chilling insight into Lori's psyche. This poses a profound question for the legal system: does it make sense to try someone who may never recognize their guilt or feel the weight of their actions?
     
     The hosts discuss the nature of justice and what it means for the victims' families. The re-traumatization of these families becomes a central concern, weighed against the perceived futility of expecting any form of remorse from Lori. Brueski reflects, "Does it make sense, though, to re-traumatize oneself again, having to go through all of this with someone who is never going to admit their guilt?"
     
     As the conversation unfolds, Constantine touches upon the nature of evil. She expresses a rare but firm belief that some individuals are just "plain evil," a concept difficult for many to grasp. The discussion extends into the philosophical as they consider the existence of evil as an inherent part of human nature. This brings into question the expectations society might hold for Lori to one day feel empathy for her actions – an expectation that Constantine finds implausible.
     
     The expert’s analysis of Lori’s mental state draws a distinction between mental illness and pure malevolence, suggesting that Lori's actions were not the product of insanity but of an intrinsic evil. Constantine’s perspective challenges the narrative that mental illness is always at the root of such crimes, "She's got mental illness, but I think that she's just plain evil."
     
     As they delve into the future of Lori's legal battles, the hosts of "Hidden Killers" ponder the effectiveness of the justice system in dealing with such an individual. The trial, the pursuit of justice, the hope for remorse – all become questionable in the face of what Constantine describes as a lack of common ground between light and darkness.
     
     In closing, the podcast leaves its audience with a haunting consideration. Is expecting someone who is "doomed" to change a futile hope? Does the quest for justice end at punishment, or is there a deeper need for the perpetrator to acknowledge their crimes and show repentance? With the case of Lori Vallow Daybell, society may have to confront the uncomfortable possibility that some individuals may be beyond the emotional reach of remorse and guilt – a troubling thought that challenges our very understanding of justice and human nature.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    7 min
  • Bryan Kohberger's Courtroom Optics Look Worse and Worse
    Can a crime scene visit sway the jury's verdict? This crucial question has emerged in the latest discussions around the Bryan Kohberger case on the podcast "Hidden Killers," featuring psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott. With the FBI recently unboarding the house on King Road where the alleged crimes took place, the difference between observing a crime scene firsthand versus through pictures or video is becoming a critical talking point in the judicial process.
     
     Shavaun Scott explained, "Anything where you can make the jury... experience what it must have been like to be in that house at that time will have an emotional impact on them and will make it more real." Scott's assertion resonates with the experience of the Alex Murdaugh trial jurors, who reported that visiting the crime scene offered them a stark realization of the accusations.
     
     The practice of allowing jurors to visit crime scenes is not without controversy, however. Tony Brueski, the podcast host, raised the question of the house's presence itself, noting that both prosecution and defense have been indifferent to its standing, stating they "don't care if the house is there or not."
     
     This indifference has sparked speculation. Why would the prosecution, in particular, not insist on preserving the site? Scott offered, "It's really hard to know. We're just speculating... So much of the community wants the house gone...there's a strong sense in the community of just please eliminate this huge, ugly trigger for trauma."
     
     Despite community sentiments, the necessity for justice remains at the forefront. Scott posited, "Justice for Kohberger and justice for the victims, that's got to be the first priority." This tension between community healing and the integrity of the judicial process remains a delicate balance to strike.
     
     Shifting from the physical to the psychological, Brueski and Scott discussed Kohberger's recent courtroom demeanor. Notably, his hand steepling—a gesture typically associated with confidence—marked a departure from his previously subdued presence. "Do you think Kohberger is feeling a little more confident right now?" Brueski asked.
     
     Scott drew comparisons to infamous figures like Ted Bundy, suggesting that if Kohberger is guilty, his apparent confidence could stem from a similar narcissistic and perverse enjoyment of the attention he's receiving, a chilling consideration that echoes throughout the podcast.
     
     When it comes to courtroom optics, the strategy for presenting a defendant like Kohberger, should he not align with reality's terms, remains debatable. "You don't necessarily want them looking out of control in any way...but looking overconfident is not a good optic either," Scott mentioned, hinting at the complex interplay between perception and reality in legal defense.
     
     Yet, as Brueski pointedly concluded, "He may not be very good at that," indicating a potential disconnect between Kohberger's self-perception and the gravity of the charges against him.
     
     This thoughtful exchange on "Hidden Killers" brings to light the multifaceted challenges in the Kohberger case, from the tangible impact of crime scene visits to the enigmatic behavior of the accused. The discourse provides no clear answers but underscores the nuanced aspects of a trial that is as much about psychological understanding as it is about factual evidence.
     
     As the conversation wrapped, a pivotal question lingered: Is justice best served by the cold reality of evidence, or does the psychological interplay within a courtroom hold sway over the scales of justice? And in the case of Bryan Kohberger, which will prove most decisive?

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    9 min
  • What Holes Could Kohberger’s Defense Poke Into Genetic DNA Evidence?
    Can a deeper dive into DNA evidence and body language foretell the fate of a murder suspect? This is the question that unfolded in the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delve into the complexities surrounding the Bryan Kohberger case.
     
     In a significant ruling, the judge in the Kohberger case rejected the defense's motion to dismiss charges due to minor errors in jury instructions. Yet, what the defense succeeded in obtaining could alter the course of the trial: a thorough examination of the genetic genealogy evidence against Kohberger during discovery. This move prompts Brueski to question, "Is there anything in this that they can take a look at and say, 'yeah, this doesn't really add up the way that you gathered it,' and could it affect the case?"
     
     Constantine's expertise sheds light on the implications of such a strategy. "This genetic genealogy stuff is powerful," she acknowledges, referencing a personal anecdote about the unexpected discovery of a friend's grandson to illustrate its impact. However, she warns of the potential backfire, emphasizing the "slippery slope" Kohberger's defense might find themselves on if they uncover evidence that reinforces the prosecution's case.
     
     Indeed, the defense's approach is audacious, as Constantine credits Kohberger's attorney with leaving "no stone unturned." But this begs the question, at what risk? "It seems like maybe a place you don't want to go shining your flashlight around if you're the defense," Brueski interjects, highlighting the dangers of bringing unwanted evidence to light.
     
     Constantine's insights extend beyond the DNA evidence. Her analysis of Kohberger's body language in recent court appearances reveals a shift in his demeanor. "He's feeling a little more comfortable, isn't he? Seems like it," she observes. Notably, she points out Kohberger's "steeple" gesture—a sign of confidence—which is a departure from his previous courtroom behavior. She interjects, "The higher the steeple, the higher the confidence."
     
     The expert further decodes Kohberger's nonverbal cues, noting a suspicious look "off to the corner of his eye" during the proceedings. This synchronization of physical gestures with the timing of statements can be telling of an individual's internal processes, according to Constantine.
     
     As the conversation progresses, the topic shifts to the ethical boundaries of coaching a defendant on body language. Constantine firmly opposes such practices, stating, "I've never coached... I've done witness prep... but never to the point where [I instruct them], 'when she says this, I want you to do that.'"
     
     The discussion circles back to Kohberger's evolving courtroom presence. Constantine contrasts his initial interactions—avoiding eye contact, a sign of his antisocial tendencies—with his now more assured stance, attributing it to a sense of "getting some wins," which may be boosting his confidence.
     
     While Kohberger's defense might interpret these developments as positive, Brueski remains skeptical, implying that any so-called victories are pyrrhic at best, given the gravity of the accusations.
     
     The episode closes with a poignant reflection by Brueski and Constantine on the weight of evidence and the human element within the justice system. Constantine's years of experience have taught her to be selective about the cases she involves herself in, particularly steering clear of "horrible heinous murder cases" and "child molestation" unless unequivocal evidence of innocence is presented.
     
     So, what does Kohberger's newfound courtroom confidence truly signify? And as the defense peers into the genetic genealogy that led to his arrest, might they uncover their own Pandora's box of irrefutable evidence? These are the questions that "Hidden Killers" leaves its audience contemplating, as the legal battle over Bryan Kohberger's fate continues to unfold.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    10 min
  • Why Is There So Much Police & Government Corruption In Delphi Indiana?
    What do we truly know about the intricacies of justice in small-town America, particularly when the eyes of the nation aren’t watching? The case of Richard Allen, accused of a heinous crime in Delphi, Indiana, brings this question sharply into focus. With questionable judicial decisions and a community enveloped in a tense atmosphere, the case’s peculiarities evoke a narrative so strange it rivals fiction.
     
     At the heart of this unfolding drama is Richard Allen, charged with the murder of two young girls, yet the evidence against him remains under scrutiny. Tony Brueski, the host of "Hidden Killers," points out, "We're seeing it highlighted right now by Richard Allen, who's accused of being the murderer of those two little girls, but with not a ton of evidence against him." The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' seems to blur in Delphi, as pretrial proceedings spawn more concerns about fairness and legal representation.
     
     A judge’s decision to replace Allen's long-standing defense attorneys with one who narrowly escaped disbarment has raised eyebrows. The appearance of a sheriff and an accused henchman overseeing the hearing adds to the perception of an unconventional legal process, perhaps compromised by personal vendettas or communal pressures.
     
     The conversation with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott on the podcast shines a light on the deepening abyss of bizarre events surrounding the case. "It's layers of bizarre, and it just seems to get stranger and stranger as it goes on," Scott remarked. The involvement of Odinism cult allegations and the questionable mental health support for Allen in detention further taint the case with shades of the surreal.
     
     These anomalies in Delphi's judicial ecosystem raise unsettling questions about the checks and balances—or lack thereof—in smaller communities. With a decline in local press, the forces that once held power accountable seem weakened. As Brueski contemplates, "Is that why we're starting to see more and more things like this in some of these smaller towns? Or is this just a reflection of how it's really always been and we're just putting a microscope on it more than ever?"
     
     Scott leans towards the latter, suggesting that such intertwined irregularities have always existed but now face unprecedented scrutiny due to the internet and alternative reporting channels. However, the attention may not be enough to penetrate the tight-knit power structures within communities like Delphi.
     
     As the case progresses, with Allen’s Sixth Amendment rights potentially infringed and his wellbeing in custody a growing concern, the role of external oversight becomes crucial. But what happens when those expected to catalyze change are the ones accused of perpetuating the problem?
     
     "Where do you go? What do you do when you're in a community like that or you're in a situation like Richard Allen?" Brueski asks, articulating the helplessness that can engulf those caught in such a vortex. The possibility of the Indiana Supreme Court intervening offers a glimmer of hope, but the limitations of such interventions are evident.
     
     Scott's insights underscore the psychological toll on Allen, isolated and declining in solitary confinement. "Does he need therapy? Does he need a psychiatrist? Does he need medication?" she questions, highlighting the urgent need for adequate mental health support for detainees, an often-overlooked aspect of the criminal justice system.
     
     This case, with its peculiar twists and the shadow it casts on the integrity of local governance and justice, does more than just question the fate of one man. It challenges our collective confidence in the justice system, particularly in settings where communal bonds may unduly influence the scales of justice.
     
     As the nation watches and waits for the Supreme Court's response, the question lingers: Will the people of Delphi, empowered by new awareness and possibly by voting power, usher in change? Or will these oddities fester, perpetuating a cycle of injustice hidden away from the public eye?
     
     And for those following the case, there's another question, equally haunting, that may well linger beyond the final gavel: How does a society ensure its justice system upholds not just the law, but humanity itself?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    10 min
  • What New Info or Lies Might We See In the New Alex Murdaugh Trial?
    Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.
     
     During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.
     
     "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."
     
     The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.
     
     The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."
     
     Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.
     
     In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.
     
     The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?
     
     As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    11 min
  • What Was Kaitlyn Armstrong Thinking When She Attempted To Escape?
    What triggers a seemingly ordinary person to potentially commit an extraordinary crime? This question lies at the heart of the recent "Hidden Killers" podcast episode with host Tony Brueski and psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, as they delve into the mind of Kaitlin Armstrong, who is accused of murdering Anna Moriah Wilson. The case raises fascinating questions about rage, jealousy, and the psychological mechanisms that may lead one to extreme behavior.

    According to the podcast discussion, Armstrong's potential actions could be viewed through the lens of a heat-of-the-moment rage triggered by jealousy. The case suggests that upon discovering communication between her boyfriend and Wilson via an app, Armstrong may have been consumed by an uncontrollable anger that led to alleged drastic measures. "The rage can be all-consuming and alters the way that they're thinking and the way that they're perceiving," Shavaun Scott explains, shedding light on the cognitive distortion that can occur in such intense emotional states.

    But what happens immediately after such an act? The conversation turns to the concept of fight or flight, suggesting that Armstrong chose flight, evidenced by her reportedly extreme efforts to change her appearance. This level of response, including accessing her sister's passport and undergoing plastic surgery, is indeed rare and suggests a degree of premeditation, as Brueski and Scott discuss. Scott speculates, "Having apparently funds...to enable her to get plastic surgery. My guess on that was she had not been happy with her nose anyway...but that's where my mind went."

    As the podcast delves deeper, it reveals that individuals who can commit such acts may often appear utterly normal in other aspects of their lives. Scott points out the duality of Armstrong's persona: "She may have been a very benign, typical kind of yoga teacher on the outside...but it doesn't surprise me that this kind of thing can happen because it is the two sides."

    The discussion highlights the difficulty in recognizing warning signs in individuals who may be capable of such extreme behavior, especially early in relationships. Scott notes that these individuals "can be very seductive and very appealing" and can often "role play normal." One of the key warning signs she identifies is "intense rage episodes that seem to come out of really benign situations," which can be an indicator of a more profound emotional disorder.

    Shavaun Scott's insights also underscore the challenges family members and partners face when dealing with someone who might have such a disorder. The complexities are such that while the individual may exhibit caring and positive traits at times, these are not representative of their entire character. As Scott explains, "when times are good, times can be really good," which often makes the situation exceedingly confusing for those close to the person.

    The episode doesn't shy away from discussing Armstrong's attempted escapes, including her decision to flee just before her trial. Scott reflects on the possible disconnection from reality, which could be linked to the term 'borderline' itself. It was "originally many years ago...thought it was on the borderline between somebody who just had kind of normal neurotic problems...and psychosis," Scott says. This suggests a pattern of behavior where emotional turmoil might lead to impulsive, even self-destructive actions.

    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast episode weaves a complex narrative of human psychology, exploring the deep-seated issues that can drive a person to allegedly commit a heinous act. From the discussion emerges a portrait of a person who, under the surface of an ordinary life, might harbor intense emotions capable of overriding rational thought and provoking extreme behavior.

    This narrative prompts us to consider the intricate web of human emotions and how they can sometimes lead to tragedy. But one question remains: Can we ever truly predict when someone might cross the line from passionate emotions to dangerous actions?
    8 min

About Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

From the publisher's feed

Welcome to Mind Behind The Crime, the authoritative podcast that grants you exclusive access to the profound insights of respected psychologists, psychotherapists, and mental health experts as they…

More shows like Mind Behind The Crime | The Psychology Of Killers

20/20 by ABC News

20/20

11,937 Listeners

48 Hours by 48 Hours

48 Hours

10,763 Listeners

Crime Stories with Nancy Grace by iHeartPodcasts and CrimeOnline

Crime Stories with Nancy Grace

8,564 Listeners

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch by R. Scott Reisch

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

507 Listeners

Dateline NBC by NBC News

Dateline NBC

46,903 Listeners

Court TV Podcast by Court TV

Court TV Podcast

1,069 Listeners

The Emily Show by Baker Media, LLC.

The Emily Show

1,992 Listeners

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews by Real Story Media

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

612 Listeners

Pretty Lies And Alibis by GiGi McKelvey

Pretty Lies And Alibis

1,561 Listeners

Murder Sheet by MurderSheet

Murder Sheet

136 Listeners

Surviving the Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime by Surviving the Survivor

Surviving the Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime

1,168 Listeners

The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery | Criminally Obsessed by Anne Emerson, Charlie Condon, Drew Tripp, Daniel Michener, Maxwell Harrison

The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery | Criminally Obsessed

1,205 Listeners

The Consult: Real FBI Profilers by PodcastOne

The Consult: Real FBI Profilers

1,347 Listeners

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns by Hidden Killers Podcast

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

95 Listeners

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary by True Crime Today

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

905 Listeners

The Murder Of Stephen Smith by True Crime Today

The Murder Of Stephen Smith

23 Listeners

The Gilgo Beach Murders: The Case Against Rex Heuermann by True Crime Today

The Gilgo Beach Murders: The Case Against Rex Heuermann

94 Listeners

Nightmare In Wisconsin: Taylor Shabusiness Trial by True Crime Today

Nightmare In Wisconsin: Taylor Shabusiness Trial

10 Listeners

Malevolent Mormon Mommys | The Case Against Ruby Franke & Jodi Hildebrandt by True Crime Today

Malevolent Mormon Mommys | The Case Against Ruby Franke & Jodi Hildebrandt

62 Listeners

The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs by The Downfall Of Diddy

The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs

225 Listeners

The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential by NBC10 Boston

The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential

317 Listeners

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe by True Crime Today

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

608 Listeners

Pure Evil: The Sentencing Of Aiden Fucci by True Crime Today

Pure Evil: The Sentencing Of Aiden Fucci

8 Listeners

Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes | The Dennis Rader Story by True Crime Today

Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes | The Dennis Rader Story

7 Listeners

The Murder Of Maddie Soto by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Murder Of Maddie Soto

17 Listeners

The Suitcase Murder | The Trial Of Sarah Boone by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Suitcase Murder | The Trial Of Sarah Boone

5 Listeners

Justice For Harmony | The Trial Of Adam Montgomery by Hidden Killers Podcast

Justice For Harmony | The Trial Of Adam Montgomery

12 Listeners

The Mysterious Murder Of Dr. John Forsyth by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Mysterious Murder Of Dr. John Forsyth

6 Listeners

The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore

6 Listeners

Who Killed 2Pac? | The Murder of Tupac Shakur by True Crime Today

Who Killed 2Pac? | The Murder of Tupac Shakur

8 Listeners

Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield by Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield

Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield

829 Listeners

The Trial Of Barry Morphew by Hidden Killers Podcast

The Trial Of Barry Morphew

6 Listeners