The Trial Of Lori Vallow Daybell | Full Courtroom Coverage

By True Crime TodayNews True Crime News Commentary

Favorites
110
Followers
Typical duration
37 min
per episode
If it hooks
60%
finish an episode

Based on Podcast App listening data

The Trial Of Lori Vallow Daybell | Full Courtroom Coverage episodes

October 19, 2023 Will Chad Daybell's Defense Team Be Able to Save His Life?
Is there an underlying strategy when a defendant asks for their trial to be televised? The upcoming case of Chad Daybell, set to begin early next year, raises this exact question. As the world gears up to witness the sequel to Lori Vallow Daybell's dramatic trial, Daybell's request for cameras in the courtroom has left many perplexed and intrigued.

Tony Brueski of the podcast "Hidden Killers" recently sat down with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to dissect the implications of Daybell's peculiar request. “Chad and his defense, they want cameras in the court. Usually the argument is just the opposite,” Brueski observed.

Shavaun Scott shared her insights, stating, "It's interesting because the man is in many ways a performer and obviously loves attention and the cameras being on him may elevate his mood. Is there a thought that he can still convince the world that he's right?" She further elaborated on Lori's demeanor during her trial, noting the noticeable loss of touch with reality after her jailing, which might not have favored her if the trial had been televised.

Daybell's contrasting stoic demeanor, evidenced in recent online hearings, presents a stark difference from Lori's behavior, leading to speculation about his mental state. Scott speculated, “My guess is Chad has not deteriorated in jail… he presents like a normal person, and he probably can give a cogent testimony. I mean, it'll be delusional, but he'll be cogent."

The impending trial poses a significant challenge for Daybell's attorneys. Faced with an abundance of evidence, they have a daunting task ahead. When asked about their likely strategy, Scott opined, "I think it's the latter [avoiding the death penalty]. I can't imagine being the attorney in these cases trying to defend either Lori or Chad... And so if they can beat the death penalty in some way, that's probably the best they're thinking they can do."

As Brueski and Scott delved deeper into the dynamics between Lori and Chad, the potential for Chad to turn against Lori arose. Brueski mused, "The only other one I do wonder about is Chad capable of flipping on Lori and does that even make a difference at this point? I could only see the one area where maybe there's some leverage is just that the death penalty... but I don't see them pulling much else back or offering much more for more information." Scott simply agreed, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

Daybell's request for a televised trial, alongside his apparent emotional steadiness, suggests a man looking to maintain control of his narrative. Whether his goal is to convey his beliefs to a wider audience, influence public opinion, or leverage his situation for a better outcome remains to be seen. However, his lawyers' potential strategies and the intricacies of the case promise to make this trial as riveting as its predecessor.

In a story already fraught with unexpected twists and turns, one can't help but wonder: Is Chad Daybell's plea for a public trial a genuine desire for transparency, or does it serve a more intricate, underlying purpose?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
6 min
October 19, 2023 Will the Upcoming Chad Daybell Trial Be a Bigger Circus Than Lori's?
The upcoming trial of Chad Daybell has captured the attention of many, reigniting debates and drawing parallels with Lori Daybell's trial, which occurred not too long ago. Yet, as one delves into the details shared on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, the distinctions between the two trials and the individuals involved become glaringly evident.

"The jury itself [is] going to be picked again from Ada County," remarked Brueski, adding a note of tension by highlighting the significance of choosing jurors from the very place where Lori's trial took place. Given the notoriety surrounding Lori's trial, the obvious question arises: Can Chad's trial escape the shadow of the media circus that defined its predecessor?

According to Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, much depends on the trial's proceedings. He speculated, "If they allow media in there, I think it'll be more of a circus." The media frenzy aside, the direction of the defense's arguments may dictate the trial's tone. "If they start really making it all about placing all the blame on Lori," said Dreeke, "I think it can be very circus-like."

As discussions delved deeper, an intriguing difference in the potential arguments for Lori and Chad emerged. While Lori's trial underscored her unique belief systems – almost hinting at her mental instability – there's uncertainty about whether Chad's defense will hinge on the same. Recalling Lori's trial, Brueski observed, "They talked so much about the fantastical nature of her belief systems." This approach seemingly branded her as "crazy."

Contrasting this with Chad's potential defense, Dreeke posited, "I think they're not going to go at [the argument that] he wasn't there. He wasn't present. It was just that he was manipulated by her." Dreeke's speculation points to a strategy painting Chad as a puppet swayed by Lori's charisma and her possibly more "extreme" beliefs.

These distinctions in character assessments are further emphasized by Dreeke's candid assessment, "I don't think it's going to be quite the same as it was for her because he's just not that insane." He elucidated, "I think he's fallen in love with his own voice, but he's not crazy. Like she's crazy." The difference in perception between Lori's apparent "insanity" and Chad's ego could drastically affect the trial's outcomes.

Another looming question pertains to the potential punishment. "I'm really interested as to why [the] death penalty for him and not her," Dreeke admitted. Given Lori's conviction, the stakes are high for Chad. The gravity of the crime, particularly when children are involved, might make some jurors more inclined towards the death penalty. However, selecting such a jury in a place like Idaho, with its unique laws, adds an extra layer of complexity.

On this subject, Dreeke remained skeptical of Chad's chances of acquittal. "He's definitely guilty," he asserted, clarifying his stance by noting that the trial is yet to take place. Yet, the connection between Lori's conviction and Chad's alleged involvement remains a salient point of contention.

In conclusion, as the trial date inches closer, speculation is rife. Differences in the perceived personalities of Lori and Chad, coupled with the media's gaze and the weight of jury selection, ensure that Chad Daybell's trial will be under intense scrutiny.

Yet, with so many variables in play, one pressing question remains: Will Chad Daybell's fate echo Lori's, or will his trial write a different narrative?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
7 min
October 18, 2023 Did A 'Head in Sand' Society Allow Daybells to Destroy Lives?
Does the pursuit of justice clash with the spectacle of suffering? The perplexing case of Chad and Lori Daybell, mired in a web of enigmatic beliefs and tragic outcomes, provokes this unsettling question. As the trial of Chad Daybell looms, the unexpected plea for courtroom cameras by the defendant himself has unleashed a torrent of speculation and ethical conundrums.

Tony Brueski, in the recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," explores this intricate dilemma with Forensic Evidence Expert Scott Roder. In the dense tapestry of their discussion, the issue of allowing cameras in the courtroom becomes a pivotal point of debate.

Chad Daybell, despite the overwhelmingly damnable evidence stacked against him, has expressed an uncharacteristic desire for cameras to be allowed in the courtroom during his trial, a move that, as per Roder, speaks to Daybell’s rampant narcissism. “This guy is an incredible Narcissist. [...] This is his last crazy flipping sermon," observes Roder.

The prosecution's reluctance to let cameras into the courtroom echoes the previous trial of Lori Daybell, where only audio recordings were permitted. The rationales for allowing public access to courtroom proceedings through cameras are manifold. Brueski and Roder delve into the dimensions of public interest, transparency, and the illumination of justice. Roder reflects, “I think it is your right. Have cameras have an open proceeding open to the public, open to the press, and I believe having cameras in the courtroom does give a certain illumination to the process on how justice is made.”

However, interwoven with the dialogue is a persistent undercurrent of caution and introspection, aptly propelled by the unsettling theme of the Daybell case, wherein spiritual deception and malevolence have led to unfathomable tragedy.

Roder goes on to contemplate the societal impact of exposure to such harrowing cases: “Do we need to see the insanity of the decrepit nature of the human condition and be visually bombarded with that, and are we better for it as a society if we bear witness to it?”

Given the public’s emotional investment in the case, Brueski leans towards allowing cameras, positing that it would enable an open record for a case that has captivated and horrified many. The question of whether such exposure aids or impedes justice remains a delicate one.

Roder highlights a crucial yet often overlooked aspect - forgiveness. Citing the case of Oscar Pistorius, he lays bare an alternative perspective, wherein reconciliation and forgiveness play an imperative role in justice. He asks, “How do victims of crimes be urged to, yeah, seek justice, but also forgive, right?”

The dissection of justice, voyeuristic public interest, and societal morality amidst the Daybell case’s dark saga serves as a stark reminder of the tenuous balance within the legal ecosystem. The visceral narratives of cruelty and death interlaced with spiritual distortion have rippled through the public conscience, invoking both repulsion and a voracious appetite for details.

Brueski and Roder's conversation meanders through the unsettling labyrinth of human depravity and the imperative of justice, pondering the fine line between public interest and morbid curiosity, between transparent justice and spectacles of suffering. Their dialogues provoke us to question how justice is not just served but also perceived, consumed, and internalized by the society that seeks it.

In an era where media often sensationalizes misery and tragedy, becoming entwined with the fabric of collective hysteria and morbid curiosity, we find ourselves at a philosophical crossroads. Does the fervor for detail and openness in such grievous cases illuminate the path for justice, or does it cast a shadow upon our moral and ethical landscape?

In the labyrinthine journey toward justice and understanding, the deliberations between Brueski and Roder prompt one to consider a closing question: where do we draw the line between witnessing justice and becoming inadvertent spectators to another’s suffering?

The Daybell case, amidst its macabre and heartbreak, perhaps serves less as an answer and more as a reflection of this persistent and haunting query.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

10 min
October 18, 2023 Will Chad Daybell Place Blame on Lori In Upcoming Trial?
As the trial for Chad Daybell looms, a crucial question arises: Why does he want cameras in the courtroom, and how might it affect the trial's outcome? A recent discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, dives into this perplexing choice, one that contrasts sharply with the trial of Lori Vallow Daybell, Chad's co-defendant.

Lori Vallow Daybell's trial earlier this year was marked by high drama. "She had the cameras on her and she's acting pretty erratically," remarked Brueski. Faddis speculated that Chad might be looking to set a distinct image from Lori, presenting himself as more composed and rational. "He's seeking to make with the public is that, 'I am not Lori. I am different than her,'" Faddis added. With so much of the case details already in the public domain, the consensus seemed to be, "what does he have to lose?"

However, the overarching question is whether Chad aims to sway public opinion or if he believes he can shape the jury's perceptions, despite the fact that the public doesn't determine his fate. After all, Chad is set to follow Lori, who's already been convicted. This sequence might afford Chad some advantages. "Chad obviously has the benefit of pointing the finger and saying, 'Hey, look... you already have the person who's responsible for this,'" Faddis explained.

Being the second in line also offers Chad the ability to anticipate the prosecution's moves, having seen them in action during Lori's trial. But how different will Chad's trial be from Lori's?

With Lori already convicted, there's a belief that Chad's defense might try to cut a deal with the prosecution. They might argue that with Lori already found responsible, Chad should be given a more lenient sentence, avoiding further heartache for all involved. Still, there's a significant obstacle that Chad's defense will need to address: the bodies of the two children were found in his backyard. Faddis surmised that the defense might focus on highlighting the differences between Chad's and Lori's pre-trial statements, especially since Lori's statements were arguably more damaging.

An intriguing aspect discussed in the podcast is the personal dynamics between Lori and Chad. While Lori's attorneys seemed restrained in their approach, possibly due to her wishes, Chad's trial may see a more direct attempt to place the blame squarely on Lori. Faddis noted, "if I'm the defense lawyer for Chad Daybell, I'm saying, 'Hey, look, your life is on the line... And what that is blaming Lori Daybell.'"

One grim possibility still hovers over Chad's trial: the potential for a death sentence. Unlike Lori, who escaped the death penalty, this outcome remains a possibility for Chad. Faddis believes that while achieving exoneration or a not guilty verdict might be challenging, Chad's attorneys might focus on saving his life. The presence of the children's bodies in his backyard presents an almost insurmountable hurdle. The goal may shift to portraying Chad as less involved than Lori, perhaps as an accomplice or accessory, in hopes of sparing his life.

Given the intricacies and intense scrutiny surrounding this case, Chad Daybell's upcoming trial promises to be one of the most watched in recent history. However, the true question remains: Will cameras in the courtroom shed light on his innocence or further plunge him into a world of guilt?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

8 min
September 26, 2023 Daybell Files Appeal Based On Mental Health, Yet Still Believes She Is Not Crazy
In the intricate world of criminal appeals, where does one draw the line between upholding a client's wishes and pursuing a line of defense deemed most potent? This remains the poignant question as the appeal of Lori Vallow Daybell, a name synonymous with intrigue and uncertainty, moves forward. Delving into the matter, the "Hidden Killers" podcast hosted by Tony Brueski brought on author and seasoned criminal defense lawyer Lori Hellis to elucidate the complexities surrounding Daybell's appeal and the pivotal role of mental health.

At the core of the discussion lies Daybell's apparent reluctance to be portrayed as mentally unstable. Brueski poses a pressing question: “If she doesn't want to have an image out there of being crazy, which she's going to have no matter what, why? Can the attorneys file this appeal on their own merit without her even agreeing to it?" Hellis clarifies that while Daybell does indeed have a say in the decision to appeal, it's the attorneys who guide her on the appeal's grounds.

The transition from trial to appeal has led to Daybell being assigned a new appellate attorney, underscoring the differing demands of trial and appellate work. As Hellis points out, this change might provide "a little bit of an opening for the attorneys to get around her desire not to use the mental health defense."

Brueski, reflecting on Daybell's beliefs, inquires, “Why spend the resources? Why are we even doing this?” It's evident that while Daybell firmly believes in her spiritual conversations with her deceased children and anticipates becoming the "queen of Rexburg," her lawyers are grappling with a more tangible reality. “It's one of her better bases of appeal," Hellis articulates, highlighting the tension between a client's wishes and a lawyer's duty to zealously represent their client's interests.

This situation draws an analogy to medical ethics, where a patient might refuse treatment despite its apparent benefits. Brueski draws a parallel to a 'do not resuscitate' order, musing about the challenges of advocating for someone who might not want that advocacy, especially if it paints them in a particular light. "At some point, crazy or not, you do have to kind of go with what the individual wants, no matter how deplorable they may be," Brueski suggests.

Hellis adds another layer of complexity by referencing her experiences representing mentally ill clients, "It's a difficult balancing act to make sure that your client's rights are protected and still deal with someone who is not firmly in reality." She reflects on Daybell's trial lawyers, Jim Archibald and Mark Means, suggesting that they faced significant challenges in defending Daybell the way they believed was right, due to her strong opinions on the mental health defense.

Hellis emphasizes a critical point in legal representation: the final call, especially on aspects as defining as the defense narrative, belongs to the client. Even if the attorneys believe a different path might be more favorable, it's the client's wishes that ultimately direct the proceedings.

As the appeal progresses, the public remains in the shadows, relying on tidbits of information to piece together a narrative that's as convoluted as it's fascinating. Daybell's own statements, including those during her sentencing, paint a picture of someone whose beliefs and views are not anchored in commonly accepted realities. Yet, whether her mental state at the time of the trial, or the crimes she's accused of, is an issue fit for legal contention remains an open question.

So, as the case of Lori Vallow Daybell continues to unfold, one can't help but ask: In the delicate balance of upholding justice, client autonomy, and advocacy, are we treading on solid ground or slipping into an abyss of ethical dilemmas?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
7 min
September 25, 2023 Was Lori Daybell Ever Competent To Stand Trial?
Is justice possible when the accused might not grasp reality? The Lori Daybell case has ignited fiery debates, shedding light on the intricacies of mental health and its impact on the courtroom. This thorny issue was the focal point of the latest "Hidden Killers" podcast episode, where host Tony Brueski sought insights from seasoned criminal defense lawyer and author Lori Hellis.

Brueski started the conversation with a candid concern, "Many of us had been waving red flags from the beginning, questioning: Is this really right?" Daybell's recent appeal wasn't based on the alleged crime's merits but her mental acuity – her ability to even stand trial. The paramount question: can one truly attain justice if the accused lacks the fundamental comprehension of reality?

Hellis highlighted a peculiarity in Idaho's legal approach to insanity, explaining, "Idaho is a little bit interesting. Doing away with the insanity plea was a bit of a bait and switch." Though the state has ostensibly eliminated the insanity plea, it still provides an avenue for defense attorneys. They can argue that their client didn't possess the necessary mental state to form an intent to commit the crime. "It's a bit like splitting hairs," Hellis observed.

This convoluted definition raises further questions. While it restricts the use of mental health as a traditional affirmative defense, it still permits a defendant to claim they didn't knowingly or intentionally commit a crime. The Daybell defense could have pursued this angle during her trial. However, Hellis pointed out a startling revelation: "It was very clear in court that she had told her attorney she did not want to use that mental defense."

Delving deeper, Hellis elucidated the two critical intersections of mental health in criminal trials. Firstly, was the accused sane at the time of the crime's commission? Secondly, can they aid in their defense? While Daybell's mental state during the crime remained unchallenged due to her wishes, post-trial appeals are challenging her competency to stand trial. "They're really going back and saying, 'Your Honor, she never should have been tried because she wasn't competent,'" Hellis stated.

Brueski further probed the series of events. In September of the previous year, with the trial set for January 2023, Daybell's attorneys made a critical move. They expressed concerns about her competence, leading the judge to vacate the trial date. The court's subsequent evaluations of Daybell's competency were sealed, leaving the public in the dark.

Yet, intriguing snippets emerged. The defense brought in Dr. Michael Wellner, a renowned psychiatrist known for determining the competency of Brian David Mitchell, the kidnapper of Elizabeth Smart. Brueski questioned the essence of this choice: "Who's the expert here? And who knows this better than other people?"

One cannot help but question the timing of this strategy, though. Why raise the mental defense now, post-trial, when it was deliberately avoided during proceedings? Hellis offered a rationale: "The attorneys don't feel quite so constrained by what she wants because the trial is over." Essentially, the appeal, anchored in mental health challenges, offers an opportunity to counter the trial's verdict without going against Daybell's wishes.

In sum, the Lori Daybell case illuminates the labyrinthine interplay of mental health, legal tactics, and the quest for justice. As the story unfolds, it prompts us to reflect deeply: In the intricate dance of law and mental well-being, where should the line be drawn?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
7 min
September 06, 2023 Lori Vallow Daybell's Legal Team Appeals for Idaho Supreme Court Review
Following the life imprisonment sentence handed down in July, Lori Vallow Daybell's defense is not standing down. Her attorney, Jim Archibald, recently filed an appeal, imploring the Idaho Supreme Court to reevaluate her case, the guilty verdict, and the pronounced sentence.

Lori Vallow Daybell was handed a life imprisonment verdict, without the possibility of parole, for the heinous act of killing her two children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. The charges further expanded to a conspiracy plot to murder Tammy Daybell, the previous wife of her fifth husband.

Detailed in the notice of appeal presented on Thursday, Archibald delineated 16 significant issues he believes warrant the Supreme Court's attention:

The pivotal question of whether District Judge Steven Boyce made an error in pronouncing Daybell fit for trial, despite her spending a considerable 10 months in a mental institution.
The contentious decision of Judge Boyce to decline Archibald’s appeal to send Daybell back to the mental institution for further evaluation, instead of proceeding to trial.
Archibald also raises concerns about Daybell's constitutional rights to a speedy trial potentially being violated, particularly due to the prosecutor's numerous requests for postponements.
Another point of contention is whether Judge Boyce erred in permitting the presentation of evidence from the ongoing Arizona case. This case concerns the alleged crimes surrounding the death of Charles Vallow, Daybell's fourth husband, and the purported attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux, previously married into Daybell's family.
The appeal also questions the discretion of Judge Boyce regarding Daybell’s sentence—three consecutive life terms without parole.
The court's decision ordering Daybell to pay a whopping $165,018 in fines and court charges, despite her evident indigence and dependence on public defense, is also under scrutiny.
Furthermore, Archibald has tabled a request for the appointment of appellate public defenders to oversee the appeal segment of Daybell's case.

It is customary for felony convictions, particularly those involving murder charges, to be appealed. Such appeals must be presented within 42 days of the sentencing. Preparations are now underway for the Supreme Court to receive a transcript of Daybell's trial. Archibald, being meticulous in his pursuit of justice for his client, is also in the process of acquiring transcripts from Daybell’s previous competency evaluations, the preliminary hearings leading up to the trial, and the sentencing proceedings.

However, this appellate process is notorious for its lengthy duration, often spanning several years. In the upcoming phase, the Idaho attorney general will assign a representative for the prosecution. This attorney, in tandem with the defense's appellate lawyer, will draft written briefs. It is also anticipated that both parties will present oral arguments before the state Supreme Court finalizes its judgment.

There's a potential hiccup in Daybell's appellate case trajectory. The state of Arizona is gearing up to extradite her, pressing charges of conspiracy to commit Charles Vallow’s murder and the alleged attempt on Brandon Boudreaux’s life. Barely a month has passed since Daybell's confinement in the Pocatello Women’s Correctional Center. Meanwhile, the trial of Chad Daybell, Lori's husband, is on the horizon, set to commence on April 1 in Ada County.

While the wheels of justice are in motion, this case serves as a reminder of the intricate dance between the justice system, victims' rights, and the accused's rights. The outcome of this appeal, especially given its high-profile nature, will be closely watched by many across the state and the nation.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Ca
8 min
September 01, 2023 The Dark Depths of Delusion: Analyzing Lori Vallow Daybell’s Courtroom Behavior
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the courtroom antics of Lori Vallow Daybell, the woman convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder of her children, JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan.

Brueski and Dreeke dissected Vallow Daybell’s behavior and statements in the courtroom, characterizing her as delusional. Dreeke noted, “She was really, and still is, massively rationalizing. Her behavior to really a huge extent and degree." He further elaborated on the depths of her delusion, pointing out her belief that her late friend Tammy Daybell is busy working in heaven and her murdered children hold powwows with Jesus and tell her she did nothing wrong. Dreeke lamented that for families seeking closure and relief from pain, it is particularly tragic that Vallow Daybell shows no remorse or recognition of her crimes.

The discussion also touched on the impending murder trial Vallow Daybell faces in Arizona, raising questions about her mental state and the practicality of another trial. While Dreeke emphasized the importance of the justice system holding people accountable regardless of their mental state, he also acknowledged the emotional toll on the families and the strain on resources, given the likely similar outcome.

Although the hosts highlighted the complexities and challenges of the situation, they underscored the need for support and therapy for the affected families. Brueski summarized, "You just gotta let go of the fact of what you're trying to feel better by having... unattainable because the person that you're trying to get it from is incapable of delivering it."

This episode of "Hidden Killers" sheds light on the profound psychological complexities surrounding the case of Lori Vallow Daybell, revealing the nuances and challenges that face the families of victims and the justice system alike.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
8 min
August 22, 2023 Lori Vallow Daybell's Cousin Talks Transition To Crazy
Braxton Southwick, a close cousin to Lori Vallow Daybell, recently shed significant light on the dark undertones of Lori's apocalyptic beliefs, raising further questions about the extent of Chad Daybell's influence on Lori, especially in the harrowing months preceding the death of her children.

Southwick, who spent much of his early life within close proximity to Lori's family, reminisced about their intertwined childhoods, stating, "Growing up within an hour of Lori, Adam (her brother) and I were as close as cousins could be." Their bond, while always strong, was solidified post-2001. "Following the tragic 9/11 terrorist attacks," Southwick detailed, "my prepper inclinations intensified, and Lori seemed to mirror my passion. We'd excitedly exchange notes on survival strategies, recommending books and sharing new insights. Our mutual interest created a sort of feedback loop that just kept amplifying."

Braxton's dedication to prepping wasn't just a fleeting interest. He lent his expertise to two seasons of National Geographic's renowned show "Doomsday Preppers", and has frequently been a sought-after voice on various television programs and conferences nationwide, elaborating on end-of-times preparation. "While Lori wasn't exactly keen on accumulating tangible prepping resources like food storage due to her frequent moves," Southwick recalled, "she took a deep dive into the realm of spiritual and religious preparation."

Southwick painted a vivid picture of his 2017 trip to Hawaii, where he and his wife stayed with Lori and her then-husband, Charles Vallow. "Our discussions predominantly revolved around prepping—books, our personal emotions, thoughts—it was exhilarating," Southwick reflected. "For Lori, this wasn’t just a hobby; it was a way of life she deeply yearned to delve into."

Lori's zeal for preparing for the end times took a sharp turn when she chanced upon "Visions of Glory", a book narrating a man's near-death experiences and his apocalyptic visions. This book, which depicted catastrophes like plagues, floods, earthquakes, and the heralding of 144,000 righteous souls before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, deeply resonated with her. Southwick admitted, "The book was certainly compelling, but Lori interpreted it with extreme fervor. We frequently discussed its content, and regrettably, I was the one who first introduced her to it."

Casting a shadow on Lori's obsession with the book, Kauai police, in January 2020, found her lounging beside a pool, the infamous "Visions of Glory" perched on her chair, with Chad Daybell by her side.

Southwick's first encounter with Chad Daybell was in 2018 at a religious conference in Rexburg. Although he was aware of Chad's vocation as a book publisher, their real conversation only commenced in March 2020. "Chad reached out to me, seeking financial assistance for Lori's bail," Southwick narrated. "I grappled with the situation; my initial instinct was to help Lori. But then, risking my house for her bail? The stakes were too high. The conversations with Chad were unsettling—his demeanor was eerily calm. Something felt amiss."

The discovery of Lori's children, JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan's bodies on Chad's property, jolted Southwick. "I had initially assumed Lori was protecting her children by hiding them, but the gruesome reality was far from what I'd ever imagined," he confessed.

Lori's subsequent arrest led to convictions of conspiracy to commit murder, first-degree murder of her children, and additionally, charges relating to Chad's former wife, Tammy Daybell. "It was utterly staggering. Lori was always an exemplary mother. Her transformation was beyond comprehension, and Chad played a pivotal role in that drastic change," asserted Southwick. He speculated on Lori's distorted perceptions, “She possibly believed her children were better off dead than facing the impending doomsday. And Chad likely manipulated her, asserting the Second Coming's imminence."

Braxton also touched upon the volatile mix of Chad's prophecies and Lori's admiration for him, "Chad was basking in the admiration from a beautiful woman, which likely egged him on to keep up his prophetic pretense. Lori, drawn to the power he seemingly wielded, clung to his every word."

Even after Lori's arrest and the chilling revelations, Southwick’s affection for his cousin remains. "She's been a wonderful cousin. The path she's taken devastates me daily. My heart aches for her, and I continue to hold her in my prayers," he revealed, his voice thick with emotion.

This chilling narrative paints a picture of two lives converging, resulting in an unfathomable tragedy, raising questions about influence, belief, and where the line between passion and obsession truly lies.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

13 min
August 13, 2023 WEEK IN REVIEW-Former FBI Jennifer Coffindaffer On Lori Vallow's Crazy Statements
Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.

This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.

Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
5 min

About The Trial Of Lori Vallow Daybell | Full Courtroom Coverage

From the publisher's feed

Get ready for a true-crime podcast that will shock you to your core with the sick and twisted story of Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow Daybell. We'll take you on a harrowing deep dive into the lives of…