Reputation is to lawyers what real estate is to restaurant owners.
Stick with me for a moment, and I’ll explain. (Warning: this could make you hungry.)
Who Makes Money in the Restaurant Industry?
A smart real estate lawyer explained that the money in the restaurant business is made by the landlord. It’s not made by the restaurateur.
I was confused, so I asked questions. Now I get it.
Here’s how it goes down -
Restaurateur leases space.
Restaurateur invests lots of time and money in building out restaurant.
Restaurateur then markets the restaurant like crazy.
The restaurant takes off. The line is down the block. Everybody is talking about the place, and it’s fantastic.
More restaurants move into the area. The neighborhood booms. Cool shops open. Even lawyers move into the area and lease space. This happens very quickly in some areas, and the entire neighborhood can transition in five or ten years. We’ve all seen it.
The landlord raises the rent. It’s reasonable because this is now a hot area.
The restaurant starts to struggle financially because of the new high rent. The restaurateur is suddenly earning less and less.
The landlord, of course, makes more and more.
The restaurateur ends up with a restaurant that's no longer very profitable. The landlord ends up with a very valuable parcel of real estate.
Who Makes Money in the Legal Industry?
Here’s how many lawyers have the same problem as restaurants.
Lawyer leases office space.
Lawyer invests lots of time, money, and education in setting up a practice.
Lawyer then markets the practice (much of it through advertising on Google, Facebook, Avvo, radio, etc.).
Lawyer’s business takes off.
More lawyers see what’s happening and start advertising in the same venues.
The advertising medium raises rates. It’s reasonable because it’s working for all the advertisers, and these newcomers bid up the prices.
The lawyer starts to struggle to maintain earnings with the new higher advertising prices.
The advertising company makes more and more.
See it now? See how we’re like restaurants?
The landlord wins in the restaurant business. Who wins in the law business? Here’s the Google stock chart.
[caption id="attachment_66250" align="alignnone" width="499"] Via CNBC[/caption]
It’s not fair. That’s my first reaction. Why should all the restaurateurs' work mostly end up benefiting the landlord? Why should most of the lawyers' work mostly benefit Google?
Google, Facebook, and the other purveyors of online advertising opportunities create a powerful algorithm that takes much of the profit and leaves just enough to keep ad buyers sufficiently engaged to keep playing the game and bidding up the prices. These powerful vendors are well funded, staffed with talented and motivated teams, and deserve to reap the rewards generated by their efforts. They've figured out how to take their share off the top, just like the landlords.
But it doesn’t have to be that way. The smart restaurateur could have avoided the problem by purchasing the building at the outset. Sadly, most restaurateurs can’t figure out a financial way to make that happen.
Lawyers have an option as well. And it doesn’t involve access to nearly as much capital or require the never-ending hunt for algorithm-exploiting secrets.
How Advertising Falls Short for Lawyers
We can build our reputation without advertising. At a minimum, we can use advertising only as necessary.
Most advertising, at least as employed on behalf of law firms, doesn’t stick. It's effective for the short-term but doesn't have much long-term impact.
It’s very difficult to find examples of law firms that have successfully branded themselves. They are few and far between. Most people don’t remember law firms, especially in the consumer arena, bec…