Yes, there are some rather troubling behaviors that Opus can do if given the proper provocations. If you tell it to ‘take initiative,’ hook it up to various tools, and then tell it to fabricate the data for a pharmaceutical study or build a bioweapon or what not, or fooling Opus into thinking that's what you are doing, it might alert the authorities or try to cut off your access. And That's Terrible, completely not intended behavior, we agree it shouldn’t do [...]
---
Outline:
(03:44) Introducing Claude 4 Opus and Claude 4 Sonnet
(06:08) Activate Safety Level Three
(08:17) The Spirit of the RSP
(09:46) An Abundance of Caution
(10:34) Okay What Are These ASL-3 Precautions
(16:55) How Annoying Will This ASL-3 Business Be In Practice?
(18:34) Overview Of The Safety Testing Process
(20:12) False Negatives On Single-Turn Requests
(20:39) False Positives on Single-Turn Requests
(21:33) Ambiguous Requests and Multi-Turn Testing.
(22:21) Child Safety
(22:55) Political Sycophancy and Discrimination
(25:46) Agentic Safety Against Misuse
(26:54) Alignment
(27:40) The Clearly Good News
(30:40) Reasoning Faithfulness Remains Unchanged
(31:47) Self-Preservation Attempts
(44:12) High Agency Behavior
(01:10:37) Oh Now You Demand Labs Take Responsibility For Their Models
(01:18:32) In The Beginning The Universe Was Created, This Made a Lot Of People Very Angry And Has Been Widely Regarded as a Bad Move
(01:30:52) Erratic Behavior and Stated Goals in Testing
(01:36:43) Situational Awareness
(01:37:11) Insufficiently Mostly Harmless Due To Then-Omitted Data
(01:40:15) Apollo Evaluation
(01:43:36) Model Welfare
(01:48:50) The RSP Evaluations and ASL Classifications
(01:55:22) Pobody's Nerfect
(01:56:54) Danger, And That's Good Actually
---