Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Why Algorithms Can’t Predict Your Love Life with Dr. Paul Eastwick
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Why Algorithms Can’t Predict Your Love Life with Dr. Paul Eastwick
Modern dating can feel like a marketplace. We’re told we all have a “mate value,” that some people are 9s and 10s, and that the laws of evolution determine who gets chosen — and who gets rejected. But what if we’ve misunderstood what evolutionary science actually says about love?
Dr. Laurie sits down with social psychologist Dr. Paul Eastwick, author of Bonded by Evolution: The New Science of Love and Connection, to challenge some of the most pervasive myths about attraction and compatibility. Do dating app algorithms actually know who's right for you? Are we really all placed in different "leagues"? If you’ve ever wondered whether love is destiny, biology, or something you can actually create, Dr. Eastwick offers a surprising new perspective.
Resources mentioned in this episode:
Bonded by Evolution: The New Science of Love and Connection
“The Pairing Game: A Classroom Demonstration of the Matching Phenomenon”
“Matching for Attractiveness in Romantic Partners and Same-Sex Friends: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Critique”
“The Social Relations Model”
“Once More: Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness”
“Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner?”
“Northwestern Speed-dating Study I”
“Northwestern Speed-dating Study II”
“The (Mental) Ties That Bind: Cognitive Structures That Predict Relationship Resilience”
“We’re Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships”
“Romantic Relationship Status Biases Memory of Faces of Attractive Opposite-Sex Others: Evidence from a Reverse-Correlation Paradigm”
“Relationship Regulation in the Face of Eye Candy: a Motivated Cognition Framework for Understanding Responses to Attractive Alternatives”
“Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm”
“Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction”
“Love Factually”
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
View all episodes
By Pushkin Industries
4.7
1393313,933 ratings
Modern dating can feel like a marketplace. We’re told we all have a “mate value,” that some people are 9s and 10s, and that the laws of evolution determine who gets chosen — and who gets rejected. But what if we’ve misunderstood what evolutionary science actually says about love?
Dr. Laurie sits down with social psychologist Dr. Paul Eastwick, author of Bonded by Evolution: The New Science of Love and Connection, to challenge some of the most pervasive myths about attraction and compatibility. Do dating app algorithms actually know who's right for you? Are we really all placed in different "leagues"? If you’ve ever wondered whether love is destiny, biology, or something you can actually create, Dr. Eastwick offers a surprising new perspective.
Resources mentioned in this episode:
Bonded by Evolution: The New Science of Love and Connection
“The Pairing Game: A Classroom Demonstration of the Matching Phenomenon”
“Matching for Attractiveness in Romantic Partners and Same-Sex Friends: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Critique”
“The Social Relations Model”
“Once More: Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness”
“Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner?”
“Northwestern Speed-dating Study I”
“Northwestern Speed-dating Study II”
“The (Mental) Ties That Bind: Cognitive Structures That Predict Relationship Resilience”
“We’re Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships”
“Romantic Relationship Status Biases Memory of Faces of Attractive Opposite-Sex Others: Evidence from a Reverse-Correlation Paradigm”
“Relationship Regulation in the Face of Eye Candy: a Motivated Cognition Framework for Understanding Responses to Attractive Alternatives”
“Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm”
“Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction”
“Love Factually”
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
More shows like The Happiness Lab with Dr. Laurie Santos
View all
TED Radio Hour
21,947 Listeners
Hidden Brain
43,529 Listeners
The One You Feed
2,562 Listeners
Untangle
856 Listeners
Good Life Project
3,363 Listeners
On Being with Krista Tippett
10,184 Listeners
Revisionist History
58,901 Listeners
10% Happier with Dan Harris
12,765 Listeners
Being Well with Forrest Hanson and Dr. Rick Hanson
2,533 Listeners
Broken Record with Rick Rubin, Malcolm Gladwell, Bruce Headlam and Justin Richmond
4,110 Listeners
The Science of Happiness
1,905 Listeners
Worklife with Adam Grant
9,122 Listeners
Life Kit
4,845 Listeners
Solvable
569 Listeners
Go and See
402 Listeners
Making a Killing with Bethany McLean
71 Listeners
A Bit of Optimism
2,219 Listeners
Deep Cover
4,497 Listeners
Hearing with Tali Farhadian Weinstein
79 Listeners
Fiasco
442 Listeners
ReThinking
627 Listeners
A Slight Change of Plans
2,064 Listeners
Bad Women: The Blackout Ripper
1,221 Listeners
Backstage Pass with Eric Vetro
233 Listeners
What's Your Problem?
260 Listeners
Not Lost
435 Listeners
Car Show! with Eddie Alterman
151 Listeners
The Loudest Girl in the World
332 Listeners
Come As You Are
374 Listeners
Started from the Bottom
99 Listeners
The Best Audio Storytelling 2022
78 Listeners
Dare to Lead with Brené Brown
276 Listeners
Where's Dia?
274 Listeners
Charlie's Place
69 Listeners