
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Based on Podcast App listening data
On the Root Cause Medicine Podcast, Dr. Lara Zakaria joins Dr. Malisa Carulo to explore specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), omega-3-derived precursors, and emerging pain research, with a focus on evidence limits and clinical decision-making.
Dr. Malisa Carulo holds a doctorate in naturopathic medicine and an MS in biology. Introduced as Senior Manager of Medical Information and Safety at Metagenics, her interests include chronic disease, healthy aging, and sports medicine.
1. What are specialized pro-resolving mediators?
SPMs, including resolvins, protectins, and maresins, as lipid signals involved in the active resolution of inflammation. (Serhan 2018)
2. How do SPM-focused supplements differ from fish oil?
The guest distinguishes EPA and DHA from downstream intermediates such as 18-HEPE, 17-HDHA, and 14-HDHA. This distinction alone does not establish superior clinical outcomes. (Möller 2023)
3. What evidence for SPMs and joint pain does the episode discuss?
The guest highlights early human research in musculoskeletal pain, including osteoarthritis, while acknowledging that clinical evidence remains limited relative to mechanistic research. (Callan 2020) (Möller 2023)
4. Are SPM supplements established therapies for autoimmune or gut conditions?
The discussion does not establish that use. The guest describes clinical experiences and biological hypotheses rather than condition-specific evidence sufficient to support broad treatment claims.
5. Does the episode establish an SPM dosing protocol?
No. Studies have used doses ranging from about 250 mg per day in early research to 500 mg and 1 g in human trials, but the guest cautions that evidence-guided dosing recommendations remain limited. (Callan 2020) (Möller 2023)
03:56 SPM biology and marine-oil intermediates
07:42 Conversion pathways and inflammation resolution
11:15 Mechanistic research versus human evidence
13:21 Evaluating formulations and clinical outcomes
18:44 Measurement limitations and pain research
24:38 Dosing discussion and anecdotal strategies
30:25 Tracking pain, stiffness, and mobility
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the hosts and the guests, and they don't necessarily reflect the views of FullScript or any affiliated organizations. This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only, and it's not intended to be medical advice. For your safety, always check with your healthcare provider before making any changes to your healthcare routine.
References
Dr. Kate Kresge is joined by psychiatrist James Greenblatt, MD, to discuss themes from his book Finally Hopeful, including nutrition, depression, laboratory assessment, and antidepressant withdrawal.
Clinical Takeaways
Guest: James Greenblatt, MD
James Greenblatt, MD, is a psychiatrist and educator in integrative and functional psychiatry. He discusses a whole-person framework for evaluating depression, nutritional status, and antidepressant discontinuation.
Clinician FAQ
1. Can nutritional deficiencies contribute to depressive symptoms?
Yes, nutritional status can be clinically relevant, but depression is multifactorial. (Bender 2017) (Malhi 2018) The episode discusses iron, vitamin B12, folate, vitamin D, zinc, and other nutrients clinicians may evaluate when appropriate.
2. Why distinguish antidepressant withdrawal from depression?
Withdrawal can occur when antidepressants are reduced or stopped, and symptoms may overlap with psychiatric symptoms. (Henssler 2024) (Horowitz 2019) Distinguishing withdrawal from recurrence of depression is important during discontinuation. (Horowitz 2019)
3. Should nutritional status be assessed before antidepressant tapering?
The episode proposes evaluating nutritional status before and during tapering. Medication changes should be individualized and managed with the prescribing clinician.
4. What role do amino acids play in mental health?
Amino acids from dietary protein are precursors for many biologically important molecules, including neurotransmitters. (Tang 2025) The episode discusses amino acid assessment as part of Dr. Greenblatt’s clinical approach.
5. Why screen for medical conditions in patients with depression?
Some medical conditions may produce symptoms that resemble or coexist with depression. (Bode 2021) (Lee 2020) (Clappison 2020) The episode highlights thyroid disorders, anemia, and celiac disease as examples clinicians may investigate when clinically indicated.
Key Moments
03:44 Whole-person framework for depression
07:46 Antidepressant withdrawal
11:29 Nutritional assessment before tapering
23:23 Amino acids and nutrition
37:26 B vitamins and minerals
46:15 Depression and celiac disease case
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the hosts and the guests, and they don't necessarily reflect the views of Fullscript or any affiliated organizations. This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only, and it's not intended to be medical advice. For your safety, always check with your healthcare provider before making any changes to your healthcare routine.
References
Dr. Holly Lucille, ND, is joined by Lara Zakaria, PharmD, MS, CNS, to discuss what people can do when a scratchy throat, fatigue, or other early respiratory symptoms begin. The conversation covers rest and recovery, respiratory virus testing, zinc, vitamin C, elderberry, echinacea, honey, green tea, garlic, ginger, turmeric, and practical ways to prepare for cold and flu season.
Early symptoms of COVID-19, influenza, and other respiratory infections can overlap, making symptom pattern alone an unreliable way to identify the cause. Testing, individual risk factors, symptom severity, and timing can all affect the appropriate next step. (CDC 2026a) (CDC 2025)
Clinical Takeaways
Guest: Lara Zakaria, PharmD, MS, CNS
Lara Zakaria is a pharmacist and clinical nutritionist with a background spanning community pharmacy, functional medicine, and personalized nutrition. In this episode, she discusses how conventional pharmacy knowledge and nutrition can be brought together when thinking about early respiratory symptoms, supplement use, and practical supportive care.
Clinician FAQ
1. What should patients do when they first feel a cold coming on?
Supportive care is a reasonable starting point for uncomplicated symptoms. Rest, adequate fluids, and attention to symptom progression can help patients through a typical viral illness. Testing for COVID-19 or influenza may also be useful when results could affect treatment or precautions, particularly in higher-risk patients. (CDC 2026b) (CDC 2025)
Patients at increased risk for severe respiratory illness should contact a healthcare provider promptly because prescription antiviral treatment for influenza and COVID-19 is time-sensitive. (CDC 2026a)
2. Does zinc shorten a cold?
Possibly, but the evidence is formulation-dependent. (Nault 2024) Trials of zinc lozenges have produced conflicting findings, with some showing shorter illness duration and others showing no meaningful benefit. (Hemilä 2017) (Hemilä 2020) Differences in zinc salt, formulation, dose, timing, and lozenge composition complicate comparisons across studies. (Nault 2024)
This means findings from a specific zinc-lozenge trial should not automatically be extrapolated to zinc supplements in general. Prolonged high zinc intake can also impair copper absorption, making duration and total intake relevant to safety. (NIH 2022)
3. Should vitamin C be started when cold symptoms appear?
The evidence is stronger for regular supplementation than for starting vitamin C after symptoms begin. A large systematic review found that routine vitamin C supplementation did not substantially reduce cold incidence in the general population but was associated with modest reductions in cold duration. (Hemilä 2013) Trials starting vitamin C therapeutically after symptom onset have not demonstrated a consistent benefit. (Hemilä 2013)
Practitioners should therefore distinguish evidence for ongoing vitamin C intake from evidence for using vitamin C as an acute intervention.
4. Do elderberry and echinacea help with colds and respiratory infections?
The evidence is mixed. A systematic review of elderberry found that it may reduce the duration or severity of some viral respiratory illnesses, but the certainty of the evidence was insufficient for firm conclusions. (Wieland 2021) Echinacea research is complicated by substantial differences among preparations. (Karsch-Völk 2014) Systematic reviews and individual trials have reached differing conclusions, and some well-controlled studies have not found significant reductions in cold duration or severity. (Karsch-Völk 2014) (David 2019) Product-specific evidence matters when interpreting these findings.
5. When should respiratory symptoms prompt testing or medical evaluation?
Testing becomes particularly important when identifying COVID-19 or influenza could change treatment or precautions. (CDC 2025) Patients at higher risk for severe illness should seek healthcare promptly because antiviral treatments for influenza and COVID-19 work best when initiated early. (CDC 2026a) (CDC 2026b) Trouble breathing, chest pain or pressure, confusion, inability to stay awake, dehydration, severe weakness, or symptoms that improve and then significantly worsen warrant prompt medical assessment. (CDC 2026a)
Timestamps / Key Moments
00:03:00 Early signs that an illness may be developing
00:04:00 Temperature, heart rate, and HRV changes
00:06:35 When testing and medical evaluation may be appropriate
00:08:46 Why rest and recovery matter
00:09:55 Respiratory virus testing and RSV
00:12:15 Vitamin C and zinc
00:14:35 Vitamin C formulations and intake
00:15:24 Zinc supplements and lozenges
00:17:15 Long-term zinc intake and copper balance
00:20:30 Vitamin D status and seasonal preparation
00:22:33 Elderberry, echinacea, honey, and other botanicals
00:26:45 Symptom relief versus the underlying infection
00:30:20 Echinacea preparations
00:32:47 Green tea and EGCG
00:34:10 Garlic and allicin
00:35:15 Ginger and turmeric
00:36:49 Building a practical early-symptom toolkit
Nutrients and botanicals discussed
Supportive strategies discussed
Want to elevate your practice?
This episode is sponsored by Fullscript, a comprehensive care delivery platform designed to support whole-person, integrative healthcare. Fullscript helps clinicians bring supplement dispensing, lab ordering, and patient education into one centralized workflow.
For more practitioner education on supplements, nutrition, and evidence-informed clinical care, visit Fullscript Academy at academy.fullscript.com.
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or affiliated organizations. This episode is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Dietary supplements can cause adverse effects and interact with medications. Patients should consult a qualified healthcare professional when symptoms are severe, persistent, worsening, or when individual health conditions or medications may affect appropriate care.
References
Health Meets Wellness: The App and Dr. Edens’ Story
Dr. Elizabeth Sharp Edens is the founder of Health Meets Wellness, an integrative practice where every patient gets three plans: a medical plan, a movement plan and a nutrition plan. Guideline-based medicine is her North Star, and she layers in nutrition, yoga, herbal therapies and acupuncture, with dietitians on her team. It’s whole-person care built around how each patient actually lives.
But she didn’t stop at the exam room. She’s spent three years building the Health Meets Wellness app to bring that same care to patients between visits, and to people far beyond her own practice. It features meal plans, photo food logging, an AI health coach, symptom tracking for patients on GLP-1s, yoga videos she filmed herself, and 20-minute, no-equipment strength workouts developed with a former Milwaukee Bucks performance lead. Now it’s being rebranded for women, with cycle tracking that adapts meal and exercise plans to each phase. There’s a free version, and practitioners can use it with their own patients.
Elizabeth is double board-certified in internal medicine and obesity medicine, certified in functional medicine and a certified yoga instructor, and her path ran through Mount Sinai, a healthcare startup and One Medical. We talk about how she built her practice and her app without a tech background, why she became a yoga teacher, and how she supports patients on GLP-1s with movement and nutrition.
If you love whole-person care but work in a hospital or conventional system without a roadmap, this one’s for you.
Timestamps
Want to elevate your practice? This episode is sponsored by Fullscript, a comprehensive care delivery platform designed to support whole-person, integrative healthcare. Fullscript allows clinicians to streamline supplement dispensing, lab ordering, and patient education in one free, centralized system—helping reduce administrative burden while supporting clinical decision-making. For practitioners, Fullscript offers access to professional-grade supplements, evidence-informed protocols, and lab integrations that can support more efficient planning and follow-up. For patients, it provides a clear, organized way to receive recommendations, manage refills, and stay engaged in their care. The goal is not to replace clinical judgment, but to make it easier for clinicians to focus on what matters most: thoughtful, individualized patient care.
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and don’t necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or any affiliated organizations. This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to be medical advice. For your safety, always check with your doctor or healthcare provider before making changes to your health routine.
Dr. Oscar Coetzee joins Dr Lara Zakaria on the Root Cause Medicine Podcast to discuss emerging research on keystone commensal organisms and how microbial communities interact within the gut ecosystem.
The conversation focuses on organisms including Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. Rather than viewing individual microbes in isolation, Dr. Coetzee describes an ecosystem model centered on cross-feeding, short-chain fatty acid production, and the intestinal environment.
The episode also notes an important context: research on next-generation commensals is still developing, meaning findings from mechanistic studies, case reports, and early clinical research offer initial insights that complement rather than replace evidence from larger randomized controlled trials. (Jan 2024) (Kern 2026)
Dr. Oscar Coetzee is Vice President of Clinical Education and Practitioner Support at Designs for Health. In the episode, he discusses his work in nutrition and microbiome research and his interest in next-generation commensal organisms.
His discussion centers on moving beyond a single-organism view of probiotics toward understanding microbial communities, cross-feeding, and the environment in which commensal organisms coexist.
They are microbes discussed for their potentially important roles within the broader gut ecosystem. (Rios Garza 2026)
The episode focuses on how selected commensals interact with other organisms and their environment rather than evaluating them solely by abundance. (Banerjee 2018)
The main organisms include Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium adolescentis.
The conversation also discusses Anaerostipes caccae separately in the context of butyrate production and microbial cross-feeding. (Belzer 2017)
Cross-feeding describes how metabolites produced by one organism can serve as substrates or influence conditions for another. (Culp 2023) (Louis 2017)
The episode uses this concept to explain why microbial communities may be more informative than considering individual organisms in isolation. (Culp 2023)
They are microbial metabolites that form part of the communication between gut microbes and their environment. (Martin-Gallausiaux 2021)
The conversation highlights acetate, propionate, and butyrate while exploring how different commensal organisms contribute to their production. (Martin-Gallausiaux 2021)
Research on these next-generation commensals is still evolving. (Jan 2024) (Kern 2026)
The guest describes case observations, prospective studies, and additional research underway. These early findings can generate hypotheses, but they do not establish that a specific probiotic combination prevents or treats disease.
00:00:00 Introducing keystone commensal organisms
00:05:35 Why newer technology matters for anaerobic microbes
00:08:09 Moving beyond probiotic quantity and individual strains
00:13:32 Microbial compensation and ecosystem dynamics
00:18:00 Keystone organisms and emerging clinical observations
00:21:28 Akkermansia and microbial metabolites
00:24:08 Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and butyrate
00:30:49 Roseburia and the anaerobic environment
00:32:24 Bifidobacterium species in the microbial community
00:35:52 Anaerostipes caccae and cross-feeding
00:39:58 Supporting the microbial ecosystem
00:44:18 Current research and evidence limitations
00:48:02 Clinical considerations and unanswered questions
01:02:15 Future research and closing discussion
This episode highlights an evolving way of thinking about the microbiome: not simply as a collection of individual organisms, but as an ecosystem shaped by microbial interactions, metabolites, available substrates, and environmental conditions.
For additional practitioner education on supplement quality and clinical decision-making, visit Fullscript Academy.
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or affiliated organizations.
This episode is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Research on next-generation commensal organisms and related probiotic formulations is evolving, and emerging findings should be interpreted in the context of the strength and limitations of the available evidence.
Dr. Eric Viegas joins the Root Cause Medicine Podcast to discuss an often-overlooked part of evaluating botanical supplements for menopause: whether the product being used actually matches the ingredient that was studied.
The conversation focuses on five botanicals and botanical categories—black cohosh, Vitex (chasteberry), rhapontic rhubarb, maca, and soy isoflavones. Rather than framing individual herbs as simply effective or ineffective, Dr. Viegas emphasizes three considerations: identity, standardization, and patience.
Identity refers to confirming the correct plant species and plant part. Standardization addresses whether relevant constituents or studied extracts are consistently represented in a product. Patience refers to allowing an appropriate evaluation period rather than judging a botanical after only a few days of use.
Dr. Eric Viegas is a naturopathic doctor based in Ottawa, Canada, and works with Fullscript’s quality program.
In the episode, he describes Fullscript’s approach to supplement quality, including supplier qualification and review of product documentation. He also discusses Fullscript Tested, a program in which products are selected from Fullscript distribution centers and submitted to third-party laboratories for testing related to factors such as identity, potency, and contaminants.
His discussion of menopause botanicals centers on connecting published research with the practical question practitioners face when evaluating supplements: Does the ingredient in the product correspond to the ingredient evaluated in the research?
Identity refers to confirming what botanical material is actually present, while standardization addresses consistency in relevant constituents or preparations.
Depending on the botanical, identity can include species, plant part, variety, and other characteristics. Standardization may involve a marker compound, defined extract, or another specification associated with the preparation used in research.
Because botanical research generally evaluates outcomes over a defined period rather than after only a few doses.
Dr. Viegas argues that stopping a botanical substantially earlier than the period evaluated in research can make it difficult to determine whether the preparation received a meaningful trial. The appropriate evaluation period varies by ingredient and clinical context.
Black cohosh is presented as a botanical for which product identity and extract characteristics can affect how research is interpreted.
The discussion focuses on Actaea racemosa, particularly root and rhizome preparations, and distinguishes studied standardized extracts from unspecified black cohosh products. (Castelo-Branco 2021) (NIDDK 2025)
The episode describes its strongest evidence base as being related to premenstrual and cyclical symptoms rather than classic menopause symptoms. (Csupor 2019)
Dr. Viegas discusses why Vitex may nevertheless appear in conversations about perimenopause and also notes that some research evaluates it as part of multi-ingredient botanical combinations.
The discussion centers on a specific studied extract rather than rhapontic rhubarb as a broad ingredient category.
Dr. Viegas identifies ERr 731 as the preparation featured in the research discussed during the episode. This serves as an example of why botanical extract identity can matter when translating research findings to commercial products. (Dubey 2024)
The episode highlights botanical variety, processing, and the absence of a single universally dominant standardization marker. (Lee 2011)
Different maca varieties and processing approaches can make product-to-product comparisons more complicated than simply confirming that “maca” appears on the label.
Both formulation and individual biology may contribute to variation.
The episode discusses differences among isoflavones and describes the conversion of daidzein to equol by certain gut microorganisms as one potential source of individual variation. (Mayo 2019)
Not necessarily.
The episode emphasizes checking the species, plant part, preparation or extract, relevant standardization information, and other product specifications before assuming that findings from a particular study apply to another formulation.
00:00:00 Introducing menopause botanicals, identity, standardization, and patience
00:02:59 The three themes: identity, standardization, and patience
00:04:15 Black cohosh and its research history
00:07:41 Standardized black cohosh extracts and product testing
00:10:13 Vitex (chasteberry) and where it fits clinically
00:14:14 Introducing rhapontic rhubarb
00:16:28 Maca, menopause, libido, and mood
00:20:04 Soy isoflavones and the evidence discussion
00:21:15 Daidzein, equol, and individual response
00:22:54 Soy isoflavones and evaluation over time
00:25:08 Fullscript Academy and closing remarks
This episode highlights how botanical identity, standardization, formulation, and research design can affect the way practitioners interpret supplement evidence.
For additional practitioner education on supplement quality and clinical decision-making, visit Fullscript Academy.
The goal is not to reduce botanical selection to a single marker or label claim, but to help practitioners evaluate whether a product meaningfully corresponds to the ingredient and preparation described in the available evidence.
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or affiliated organizations.
This episode is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Botanical supplements may have contraindications, adverse effects, and medication interactions, and suitability can vary by patient. Patients should consult a qualified healthcare professional before making changes to their healthcare routine.
You've been hearing new voices in the host chair lately — so this week we're pulling back the curtain to introduce them properly. Dr. Kate Kresge sits down with Dr. Holly Lucille, Dr. Lara Zakaria, and Dr. Jessica Christie for a roundtable on the winding, deeply personal paths that led each of them into root-cause medicine.
A pharmacist nearly buried under her own stack of nutrition books who came out dual-licensed. A psychology student who couldn't find a medical school that took food and sleep seriously, so she built her own path. A holistic nurse turned naturopathic doctor who fought for her profession on the statehouse floor. And a host whose decade-long "mystery illness" resolved in three days once the right test was finally run. What ties them together is a stubborn refusal to stop at the easy answer — the instinct to say, let's think this through, because so often the protocol failed the patient, not the other way around.
Consider this your proper introduction to the team learning and sharing what works, right alongside you.
What you'll hear
Key themes
Timestamps
Want to elevate your practice? This episode is sponsored by Fullscript, a comprehensive care delivery platform designed to support whole-person, integrative healthcare. Fullscript allows clinicians to streamline supplement dispensing, lab ordering, and patient education in one free, centralized system—helping reduce administrative burden while supporting clinical decision-making. For practitioners, Fullscript offers access to professional-grade supplements, evidence-informed protocols, and lab integrations that can support more efficient planning and follow-up. For patients, it provides a clear, organized way to receive recommendations, manage refills, and stay engaged in their care. The goal is not to replace clinical judgment, but to make it easier for clinicians to focus on what matters most: thoughtful, individualized patient care.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect Fullscript or affiliated organizations. For informational and educational purposes only; not medical advice.
Dr. Lara Zakaria is joined by Stephanie Venn-Watson, DVM, MPH, to explore emerging research on pentadecanoic acid (C15:0), an odd-chain saturated fatty acid initially studied through research involving bottlenose dolphins.
The conversation connects C15:0 with cell-membrane composition, lipid peroxidation, ferroptosis, iron metabolism, metabolic health, and steatotic liver disease. It also examines research on circulating C15:0 as a biomarker associated with cardiometabolic outcomes and early human trials of C15:0 supplementation. (Imamura 2018) (Sawh 2021)
C15:0 has been proposed as a candidate essential fatty acid, however, that classification and a specific human “C15:0 deficiency syndrome” remain emerging hypotheses rather than established clinical diagnoses.
Clinical Takeaways
Guest: Stephanie Venn-Watson, DVM, MPH
Stephanie Venn-Watson is a veterinary epidemiologist whose research has included comparative medicine and the health of bottlenose dolphins cared for through the U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program.
Research involving dolphins identified similarities in metabolic and age-associated physiology that led investigators to study odd-chain saturated fatty acids, including C15:0 and C17:0. Her subsequent research has focused on the biological activity of C15:0 and the hypothesis that inadequate C15:0 may contribute to cellular vulnerability.
Some of this research is connected with patents and commercial C15:0 products, making independent replication and larger human clinical trials particularly important when interpreting the findings.
Clinician FAQ
1. What is C15:0?
C15:0, or pentadecanoic acid, is a 15-carbon odd-chain saturated fatty acid.
It occurs in foods including dairy fat and has historically been studied as a biomarker related to dairy-fat intake. (Imamura 2018) More recent research is examining whether C15:0 itself has biologically relevant metabolic effects. (Venn-Watson 2020)
2. Is C15:0 an essential fatty acid?
Not yet by established nutritional consensus.
C15:0 has been proposed as a candidate essential fatty acid, but this remains an emerging area of research. (Venn-Watson 2020) (Venn-Watson 2022) Linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid remain the conventionally recognized essential fatty acids in human nutrition.
3. What is ferroptosis?
Ferroptosis is a regulated, iron-dependent form of cell death characterized by damaging lipid peroxidation. (Dixon 2012)
The process involves interactions among cellular iron, oxidizable membrane phospholipids, and antioxidant defense systems. Ferroptosis is being investigated across metabolic, neurologic, cardiovascular, liver, and cancer biology.
4. Is high ferritin evidence that a patient is undergoing ferroptosis?
No.
Ferritin reflects iron storage but is also an acute-phase reactant. Elevated ferritin can occur with inflammation, liver disease, metabolic dysfunction, infection, malignancy, iron overload, and other conditions. (Valenti 2023) Ferroptosis cannot be diagnosed from serum ferritin alone.
5. What is metabolic hyperferritinemia?
Metabolic hyperferritinemia describes elevated serum ferritin occurring in the context of metabolic dysfunction.
A published consensus framework proposes ferritin above 300 ng/mL in men or 200 ng/mL in women together with specified metabolic criteria, while excluding or reassessing alternative explanations for hyperferritinemia. (Valenti 2023) The framework also distinguishes hyperferritinemia from confirmed tissue iron accumulation. (Liu 2024)
6. Does elevated ferritin mean a patient needs phlebotomy?
Not necessarily.
The metabolic hyperferritinemia consensus states that evidence supporting routine iron-depletion therapy is insufficient. (Valenti 2023) Phlebotomy should not be inferred from ferritin alone; evaluation of the cause of hyperferritinemia and, when appropriate, tissue iron burden is important.
7. What foods contain C15:0?
Dairy fat is one dietary source of C15:0, and C15:0 is also present in smaller amounts in some meats, fish, and other foods.
Circulating odd-chain fatty acids are not exclusively determined by dairy intake. Research also suggests that endogenous pathways involving gut-derived propionate can contribute to odd-chain fatty acid production. (Weitkunat 2017)
8. Does eating more full-fat dairy increase C15:0?
Dietary dairy fat can contribute to circulating C15:0, but the health implications of increasing full-fat dairy cannot be reduced to C15:0 alone.
Dairy foods contain multiple fatty acids, proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, and other components, and observational evidence differs by dairy-food type. (Imamura 2018) (Sawh 2021) Dietary recommendations should therefore consider the patient's overall diet and clinical context.
9. What has human supplementation research shown?
Human evidence remains limited.
One randomized trial studied 200 mg/day of C15:0 for 12 weeks in 30 young adults with overweight or obesity and found increased circulating C15:0. (Robinson 2024) A separate randomized trial evaluated 300 mg/day as an addition to an Asian-adapted Mediterranean-style diet in women with fatty liver and reported an additional reduction in LDL cholesterol and an increase in Bifidobacterium adolescentis abundance. (Chooi 2024)
Neither study establishes C15:0 supplementation as treatment for metabolic disease, ferroptosis, or metabolic hyperferritinemia.
10. Can C15:0 levels be used as a clinical treatment target?
A standardized clinical target has not been established.
Thresholds such as 5 μg/mL or 0.2% of total fatty acids have been proposed and explored in C15:0 research, but they should not currently be treated as universally validated diagnostic thresholds for deficiency or treatment targets. (Robinson 2024) (Venn-Watson 2024)
Timestamps / Key Moments
00:00:18 Introducing C15:0, cellular aging, and ferroptosis
00:02:19 Stephanie Venn-Watson’s background and dolphin research
00:05:29 How C15:0 emerged from metabolomics research
00:10:20 Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in dolphins
00:11:33 What C15:0 is and how fatty acids are classified
00:18:18 C15:0, membrane stability, and lipid peroxidation
00:19:25 Understanding ferroptosis
00:24:34 Metabolic hyperferritinemia and clinical patterns
00:27:37 Proposed C15:0 thresholds and metabolic research
00:30:43 Dietary sources of C15:0
00:40:19 Measuring circulating C15:0
00:45:49 Human clinical research on C15:0
Fatty acids and biological processes discussed
Clinical markers and conditions discussed
Want to elevate your practice?
This episode is sponsored by Fullscript, a comprehensive care delivery platform designed to support whole-person, integrative healthcare. Fullscript helps practitioners bring supplement dispensing, lab ordering, patient education, and care planning into a centralized workflow.
The goal is not to replace clinical judgment, but to support thoughtful, individualized care and reduce unnecessary administrative steps.
For more practitioner education on supplement quality, metabolic health, and clinical decision-making, visit Fullscript Academy.
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or affiliated organizations. This episode is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical advice.
C15:0 research is evolving. C15:0 is not currently an established treatment for ferroptosis, metabolic hyperferritinemia, diabetes, MASLD, MASH, or neurodegenerative disease. Elevated ferritin has multiple potential causes and should be interpreted in clinical context. Patients should consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing their diet, supplements, iron intake, or treatment plan.
References
Dr. Geeta Maker-Clark joins the Root Cause Medicine Podcast to discuss ideas from her book, Medicine for All People: Science and Ancient Wisdom for Revolutionary Healing. Drawing from family medicine, integrative medicine, culinary medicine, community health and her own upbringing, she explores a broader view of medicine that includes food, plants, nature, community, service, trust, dance, gratitude, and play.
The conversation centers on a simple idea: health is shaped not only by what happens in the clinic, but also by the environments, relationships, resources, cultural traditions, and daily practices that surround a person. Dr. Maker-Clark organizes these ideas into three areas—medicines of the earth, medicines of connection, and medicines of spirit—and discusses how practitioners can think about them alongside conventional medical care.
Clinical Takeaways
Guest: Geeta Maker-Clark, MD
Dr. Geeta Maker-Clark is a family and integrative medicine physician whose work spans patient care, nutrition education, culinary medicine, and community health. In the episode, she describes early clinical work in high-risk obstetrics and underserved communities as formative in expanding her understanding of health beyond the clinic.
She co-developed culinary medicine programming connected with the University of Chicago, including medical student education and community-based nutrition programs. Her book, Medicine for All People: Science and Ancient Wisdom for Revolutionary Healing, brings together themes of ancestral knowledge, scientific research, social justice, connection, and accessible approaches to well-being.
Clinician FAQ
1. What does Dr. Maker-Clark mean by “medicine for all people”?
She uses the phrase to describe a broader framework for health that includes conventional medicine alongside food, nature, relationships, community, cultural knowledge, and everyday practices. Accessibility and social justice are central themes in the framework.
2. What is culinary medicine?
Culinary medicine combines nutrition education with practical food preparation and cooking skills. In the program discussed in the episode, medical students learn nutrition counseling and cooking skills while community and middle school programs focus on nutrition literacy, food preparation, food justice, and culturally relevant education. (Maker-Clark 2023)
3. What does research say about nature exposure and stress?
Research generally supports an association between exposure to natural environments and improvements in some measures of perceived and physiological stress. Results vary across studies, and the effects depend on factors such as the population, type of nature exposure, comparison environment, and outcome measured. (Shuda 2020)
4. Why are loneliness and social connection clinically relevant?
Social isolation and loneliness have been associated with poorer cardiovascular and brain health and with some inflammatory markers. However, loneliness and objective social isolation are distinct concepts, and evidence does not establish that every health effect attributed to social disconnection operates through inflammation. (Cené 2022) (Smith 2020)
5. Can dance support brain health?
Dance combines physical movement with rhythm, learning, coordination, and sometimes social interaction. Systematic reviews have reported changes in cognitive and neuroplasticity-related outcomes, particularly among middle-aged and older adults. The magnitude of benefit and the cognitive domains affected vary across studies. (Teixeira-Machado 2019) (Hewston 2021) (Fong Yan 2024)
6. Does practicing gratitude improve mental health?
Gratitude interventions have been associated with small improvements in well-being and, in some studies, psychological symptoms. Results are heterogeneous, and gratitude should be viewed as a supportive practice rather than a substitute for appropriate mental healthcare. (Diniz 2023) (Kerry 2023)
Timestamps / Key Moments
00:01:41 Fullscript and whole-person care
00:02:39 Introducing Medicine for All People
00:03:09 How the book’s title and philosophy developed
00:06:07 Family medicine, obstetrics, and community health
00:07:18 How living conditions shaped Dr. Maker-Clark’s view of medicine
00:10:00 Food as a central part of whole-person care
00:11:02 Growing up with food and traditional practices
00:13:19 Bringing nutrition back into clinical practice
00:15:14 Culinary medicine and medical student education
00:16:03 Bringing food education into Chicago public schools
00:17:23 Plants, ancestral knowledge, and connection with the natural world
00:20:29 Developing relationships with plants in everyday environments
00:22:49 Plants and the history of medicines
00:24:52 Nature, stress regulation, and belonging
00:27:19 Access to nature as a health-equity issue
00:31:26 Community as a medicine of connection
00:35:16 Service, or seva, and connection with others
00:41:31 Trust in healthcare relationships
00:45:22 Rebuilding trust in the body during chronic illness
00:46:39 Small practices for rebuilding self-trust
00:49:21 Why dance, gratitude, and play are “medicines of spirit”
00:50:36 Dance, movement, and neuroplasticity
00:53:28 Dance as culture, ancestry, and expression
00:54:27 Gratitude without toxic positivity
00:58:22 Why adults still need play
01:00:44 Different adult play personalities
01:03:20 Play and social development
01:05:56 Where to find Dr. Maker-Clark and her book
Want to elevate your practice? This episode is sponsored by Fullscript, a comprehensive care delivery platform designed to support whole-person, integrative healthcare. Fullscript allows clinicians to streamline supplement dispensing, lab ordering, and patient education in one free, centralized system—helping reduce administrative burden while supporting clinical decision-making. For practitioners, Fullscript offers access to professional-grade supplements, evidence-informed protocols, and lab integrations that can support more efficient planning and follow-up. For patients, it provides a clear, organized way to receive recommendations, manage refills, and stay engaged in their care. The goal is not to replace clinical judgment, but to make it easier for clinicians to focus on what matters most: thoughtful, individualized patient care.
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or affiliated organizations. This episode is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Practices discussed in the episode should not replace individualized medical assessment or treatment. Patients should consult a qualified healthcare professional before making changes to their healthcare routine.
References
Dr. Holly Lucille, ND, is joined by Ellie Abraham, PhD, to explain why two curcumin or Boswellia supplements may not be equivalent, even when the front of the label looks similar. The conversation covers boswellic acid standardization, AKBA, curcumin delivery systems, piperine, botanical sourcing, finished-product testing, certificates of analysis, and supply-chain controls. Research supports meaningful variation in Boswellia composition and curcumin formulations, making the specific extract and formulation relevant when interpreting product labels and published evidence. (Meins 2016) (Mimica 2022)
Clinical Takeaways
Guest: Ellie Abraham, PhD
Ellie Abraham has a PhD in plant biology, with research focused on developing analytical methods for testing finished botanical products. Her background includes botanical chemistry, finished-product testing, standardization, and dietary supplement quality. In this episode, she explains how practitioners can look beyond an ingredient name to assess what a curcumin or Boswellia product is actually formulated to deliver.
These five questions best match the broad topics addressed in the episode, particularly searches around Boswellia standardization, AKBA, curcumin absorption, piperine, and supplement quality. Exact search volume is not publicly available from a standard web search. These topics are also represented in published research on botanical quality and curcumin formulation.
Clinician FAQ
1. Are all Boswellia supplements the same?
No. Boswellia products may differ in species, extract composition, total boswellic acid content, and concentrations of individual boswellic acids such as AKBA and KBA. A survey of commercial Boswellia supplements found substantial variation in composition and label compliance. (Meins 2016)
2. What does boswellic acid standardization mean?
It indicates that an extract is standardized to a stated amount of boswellic acids or, in some products, a particular constituent such as AKBA. Boswellia contains multiple boswellic acids, and their relative concentrations can vary by species and extract. (Mannino 2016) (Lauß 2024)
3. Why is AKBA listed separately on some Boswellia products?
AKBA, or 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid, is one individual boswellic acid that has received substantial pharmacologic research attention. Calling it out separately provides more specific compositional information than reporting total boswellic acids alone. (Ammon 2016)
4. Why do curcumin supplements use phytosomes, liposomes, or piperine?
Conventional oral curcumin has limited bioavailability. Phospholipid complexes, liposomal and micellar systems, and co-administration with piperine are among the approaches studied to alter its absorption and pharmacokinetics. Results vary by formulation, so an “enhanced absorption” format does not by itself establish that two products are equivalent. (Mirzaei 2017) (Heidari 2023) (Mimica 2022)
5. How can practitioners assess curcumin and Boswellia supplement quality?
Look beyond the ingredient name. Relevant product information may include botanical identity, extract and standardization details, branded ingredients tied to specific research, contaminant and adulteration testing, finished-product verification, and manufacturer transparency. Published studies have documented variability and authenticity concerns in commercial Boswellia and turmeric products. (Meins 2016) (You 2022)
Timestamps / Key Moments
00:00:36 Why familiar botanical names do not make products equivalent
00:01:27 Understanding Boswellia and boswellic acid standardization
00:02:05 Total boswellic acids and individual compounds
00:03:47 Why the boswellic acid profile matters
00:05:40 Matching botanical extracts to the supporting evidence
00:06:09 Curcumin delivery methods and formulation differences
00:07:12 Phospholipid-based curcumin formulations
00:08:29 How piperine is used with curcumin
00:10:43 Finished-product testing and label claims
00:13:43 Heavy metals and synthetic curcumin concerns
00:14:09 Understanding California Proposition 65
00:16:40 Curcuminoid complexes and certificates of analysis
00:18:18 How supply-chain controls affect botanical composition
00:20:07 Why standardization matters from batch to batch
00:21:05 What practitioners can look for when reviewing products
00:22:40 Fullscript's approach to supplier and product quality review
Botanicals and Compounds Discussed
Quality Methods and Documents Discussed
Want to elevate your practice?
This episode is sponsored by Fullscript, a comprehensive care delivery platform designed to support whole-person, integrative healthcare. Fullscript allows clinicians to streamline supplement dispensing, lab ordering, and patient education in one centralized system. For practitioners, Fullscript provides access to professional-grade supplements and practitioner education while incorporating quality review processes for brands and products offered through its catalog. The goal is not to replace clinical judgment, but to help practitioners make thoughtful, individualized decisions with clearer product and quality information.
For more practitioner education on supplement quality and clinical decision-making, visit Fullscript Academy at academy.fullscript.com.
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this podcast are those of the host and guest and do not necessarily reflect those of Fullscript or affiliated organizations. This episode is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Dietary supplements may cause side effects or interact with medications. Patients should consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing their healthcare routine.
References
From the publisher's feed
Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

763 Listeners

370 Listeners

1,069 Listeners

4,863 Listeners

3,416 Listeners

9,103 Listeners

335 Listeners

131 Listeners

1,766 Listeners

839 Listeners

507 Listeners

292 Listeners

1,461 Listeners

1,676 Listeners

1,221 Listeners